internalaudit
Expert
- Messages
- 1,145
- Reactions
- 1,137
This is coming from an Audi representative?The IS is next to be killed, then the RC. My opinion
This is coming from an Audi representative?The IS is next to be killed, then the RC. My opinion
That puzzled me as well. They had this exact technology developed over a decade ago to achieve the exact same goal the Taycan's 2-spd system is aiming for. They even developed that two-spd CVT to do the same thing on ICEVs (although it works differently).
Both the first gen RX400h and GS450h have a two-stage eCVT, basically attaching a second planetary gear set to the output shaft of the HSD transaxle. A launch stage with 1:1 reduction for max torque magnification and a cruise stage with 2.5:1 reduction for efficiency. For some reason they ditched all that development in favor of just a single stage system on majority of the latest TNGA hybrid systems.
This is coming from an Audi representative?
Indeed, but still an enthusiast.This is coming from an Audi representative?
Indeed, but still an enthusiast.
why would it be called the IS 500?? And is the NA market really in desperate need of this?
Might as well call the RC F the RC 500 too.
Unless Lexus is just stuffing the V8 into the regular IS and calling it a day, it should be the IS F. Such a powerful engine is useless in a regular sport sedan without the other hardware to handle it (e.g. brakes, suspension, etc.).
Also, next gen IS is only electric?? I hope that's not true...
Yea, I get that part, but what I don't understand is why you would put in such a powerful engine without other performance gear. Might as well just give it a TVD, launch control and all the other F stuff to make it an IS F. I don't think many regular IS shoppers are interested in a gas-guzzling V8 with so much power. The IS F badge, however, (which already has a history with 400+ hp 5.0L V8s) badge would bring in more performance enthusiasts.i am not sure if any of this is true, but of course an IS with 5.0l V8 would be called IS500.
Difference between IS-F and IS500 should be easily understandable.
I highly doubt the return of a V8 is true.i am not sure if any of this is true, but of course an IS with 5.0l V8 would be called IS500.
Perhaps you're on to something. I know that the MagX / CarSensor story very specifically spells out the 5-liter V8 going into 3IS, but what if, instead, IS 500 is like LS 500, a twin turbo 3.5-liter V6?I highly doubt the return of a V8 is true.
I like the idea of the engine in the IS, but it would likely need to be slightly detuned to just under 400 hp, so it doesn't seem like youre getting the LS engine for cheaper. The number would also need to be lower than 500, so the "hierarchy" stays intact. I like how IS 400 sounds.Perhaps you're on to something. I know that the MagX / CarSensor story very specifically spells out the 5-liter V8 going into 3IS, but what if, instead, IS 500 is like LS 500, a twin turbo 3.5-liter V6?
5K raPerhaps you're on to something. I know that the MagX / CarSensor story very specifically spells out the 5-liter V8 going into 3IS, but what if, instead, IS 500 is like LS 500, a twin turbo 3.5-liter V6?
It will be tantamount to suicide to leave just the ES and LS sedans in the line up but I would double dare Toyota to do just that.
The RC is nice but impractical for people who have more than one family member. LC just way beyond my budget and still a two-seater.
I definitely could see Toyota doing it in North America, I do not believe the people fully understand how much sedans are declining. The new sedans by the Genesis brand will not do a very well, and then you’ll see how Toyota made the right decision to put all their efforts into the ES model
What if there is indeed a surplus of unused 2UR-GSE engines and they want to get rid of them quickly? Currently the engine is used in only three low volume models, and even these underperform sales expectations. They originally expected 4000 LC500s a year, but only sells 30% of that, so I think the engine line is underutilized and possibly losing money.Perhaps you're on to something. I know that the MagX / CarSensor story very specifically spells out the 5-liter V8 going into 3IS, but what if, instead, IS 500 is like LS 500, a twin turbo 3.5-liter V6?
Can somebody enlighten me why some on this forum insist the V35A-FTS needs to be detuned for the IS? There is no cost benefit for detuning the engine. And the current 310kW version is already "detuned" compared to its full potential. Its potential competitors (M340i S4 and C43AMG) do not use detuned engines. I am very, very confused everytime I see this.but it would likely need to be slightly detuned to just under 400 hp