7th Generation (2019+) Lexus ES (250, 260, 300h, 350) Megathread

L

LS500-18

Follower
Messages
251
Reactions
354
Gecko said:
Haha. I say "best" in overall execution and as a holistic product. Unless you're looking for performance and acceleration, the ESh is pretty much perfect: Priced like an IS, more room than the LS, it has every reasonable luxury feature, the latest technology, it looks good and it returns 40+ MPG.

The LS is too compromised - the powertrains aren't a match for the platform, the suspension changes they've made over the years have dulled the agility and sharpness of GA-L and the interior isn't very spacious. The design, drive and demeanor of the car don't match, IMO.

The IS benefits from the "New N" platform being one of Lexus' best, but it needed to be all-new in 2021, not refreshed. It also badly needs new powertrains... IS 350 (2.4T), IS 350h, IS 450 (3.4L), IS 450h+, etc. Lots to love about the IS, but Lexus has done as much as they can with an old car and platform.

The ES, the more you live with it you realize, is nearly perfect. Both the V6 and the hybrid are well mated to the chassis, suspension and demeanor of the car. The hybrid has enough power and makes up for the horsepower disadvantage from the V6 with smoothness and MPG. The interior is shockingly nice and has very thoughtful details: Levinson speaker grills, quilted leather, soft touch points, different colors and textures of materials on the dash and doors, the new headlight and grill shapes are beautiful together, sun shades, ML audio is great, 12.3" screen is well placed and well integrated, trunk is huge, the list goes on.

The ES isn't making any qualms about just being a fantastic luxury sedan, and it's the only car where Lexus didn't try to make that formula into something different. It's very succinct and clear in what it is, in a way the new LS is not and the IS cannot be because of age and technology.
Click to expand...
Yes! The LS5 powertrain is too unrefined, laggy and not smooth. It has the power on paper (and in mid-to-higher RPM) but if they'd get rid of the 10 speed trans and the turbos and put a V8 in there it would be better. V8's are dead, though. Lexus really shouldn't have put run-flat tires on the LS either, that did the car no favors.

The ESh is a wonderful all around car in many ways. Very quiet, smooth, great ride, etc. It could use more torque and AWD but otherwise it's a total package.
 
S

Sulu

Expert
Messages
1,089
Reactions
1,343
Levi said:
That was and is the main and non negligible point of criticism, which hurts the car's overall perception/product.
Click to expand...
Really??? Then I don't understand how and why Lexus sells so many of them.
 
J

JustADude

Follower
Messages
487
Reactions
409
LS500-18 said:
Yes! The LS5 powertrain is too unrefined, laggy and not smooth. It has the power on paper (and in mid-to-higher RPM) but if they'd get rid of the 10 speed trans and the turbos and put a V8 in there it would be better. V8's are dead, though. Lexus really shouldn't have put run-flat tires on the LS either, that did the car no favors.

The ESh is a wonderful all around car in many ways. Very quiet, smooth, great ride, etc. It could use more torque and AWD but otherwise it's a total package.
Click to expand...
LS needs the IForceMAX powertrain. ES should get the 450H+ for next gen and would be the best suited powertrain for that vehicle imo
 
Gecko

Gecko

Administrator
Messages
4,914
Reactions
11,856
Levi said:
That was and is the main and non negligible point of criticism, which hurts the car's overall perception/product.
Click to expand...

Which one? AWD or torque?

AWD I agree with, but torque really isn't bad for 90% of driving, and the car has pretty good pickup for what it is.
 
L

Levi

Expert
Messages
2,855
Reactions
3,288
Gecko said:
Which one? AWD or torque?

AWD I agree with, but torque really isn't bad for 90% of driving, and the car has pretty good pickup for what it is.
Click to expand...
Both, but it is true car reviewers are unable to accurately judge hybrids, and do not see the advantages. Car reviewers are way above in consumption compared to real world driving and expect Tesla Plaid acceleration from everything, being spoiled, they profit from their test drives to "smash the pedal" which is not representative of everyday driving.
 
L

LS500-18

Follower
Messages
251
Reactions
354
Gecko said:
Which one? AWD or torque?

AWD I agree with, but torque really isn't bad for 90% of driving, and the car has pretty good pickup for what it is.
Click to expand...
Yes absolutely. I said the hybrid could use more torque, that's mainly because I also drive my wife's RAV4 Prime and it has the same system that I want - AWD, loads of torque, PHEV etc. More torque is easily possible with the same eCVT as the Prime.

I know the current ES will not get hybrid AWD or more torque. The hybrid absolutely has decent torque for what it is. Too much torque is pointless in FWD (see ES350 front wheelspin).
 
J

JustADude

Follower
Messages
487
Reactions
409
LS500-18 said:
Yes absolutely. I said the hybrid could use more torque, that's mainly because I also drive my wife's RAV4 Prime and it has the same system that I want - AWD, loads of torque, PHEV etc. More torque is easily possible with the same eCVT as the Prime.

I know the current ES will not get hybrid AWD or more torque. The hybrid absolutely has decent torque for what it is. Too much torque is pointless in FWD (see ES350 front wheelspin).
Click to expand...
I think we will see an AWD only ES lineup for next gen. 350H awd from NX, 350 can possibly get a fwd option, and either a 450H+ awd or 500H awd. All these should have more torque than the outgoing powertrains
 
S

ssun30

Expert
Messages
3,524
Reactions
7,753
Max output torque comparison of various powertrains for TNGA:
250h/300h FWD: 2412N.m
250h AWD: 2989N.m
300h AWD: 3712N.m
350h/400h+ FWD: 3235N.m
350h/450h+ AWD: 4535N.m
300e (UX300e): 3507N.m
300e FWD (bZ4X): 3667N.m
300e AWD: 4660N.m
450e AWD: 5997N.m
500h AWD (2nd): 6938N.m

One often overlooked advantage of eAWD is it adds extra wheel torque while mechanical AWD doesn't, thus giving them very strong initial acceleration. Simply giving the ES300h E-Four will add 54% extra wheel torque while upgrading to 350h AWD almost doubles that along with considerable performance gains without increasing power by much.

EDIT: I deleted the figures for ICEVs since there is no fair way to compare output torque of ICEVs vs. electrified vehicles.
 
Last edited:
CRSKTN

CRSKTN

Expert
Messages
2,081
Reactions
3,421
ssun30 said:
Max wheel torque comparison of various powertrains for TNGA:
200: 2979N.m
250 (2nd): 2929N.m
250h/300h FWD: 2412N.m
250h AWD: 2989N.m
300h AWD: 3712N.m
350h/400h+ FWD: 3235N.m
350h/450h+ AWD: 4535N.m
350 (2nd): 4557N.m
300e (UX300e): 3507N.m
300e FWD (bZ4X): 3667N.m
300e AWD: 4660N.m
450e AWD: 5997N.m
500h AWD (2nd): 6938N.m

One often overlooked advantage of eAWD is it adds extra wheel torque while mechanical AWD doesn't, thus giving them very strong initial acceleration. Simply giving the ES300h E-Four will add 54% extra wheel torque while upgrading to 350h AWD almost doubles that along with considerable performance gains without increasing power by much.

BTW the RX500h has 52% more wheel torque than IS500 (4574N.m), 39% more than LC500 (5000N.m), 25% more than LS500 (5556N.m) and 24% more than LC500h (5575N.m). It actually has the highest torque among all "500" labeled powertrains and just 1% lower than LX600/J300/Tundra (7000N.m). I'm very curious how it will drive.
Click to expand...
Could you help us understand this a bit better? How is the max wheel torque calculated/defined?
 
S

ssun30

Expert
Messages
3,524
Reactions
7,753
CRSKTN said:
Could you help us understand this a bit better? How is the max wheel torque calculated/defined?
Click to expand...
It was my mistake to call it wheel torque as it doesn't account for mechanical losses. Toyota lists those numbers as "torque measured at the output shaft of the powertrain", so this is the net torque multiplied by overall reduction (transmission reduction ratio x final drive reduction ratio) before sent to the wheel. In real world this would be close to torque measured by an axle dyno.

EDIT: never mind I consider the calculations for ICEVs to be very flawed and result in unrealistic numbers; the ICE would have to be able to rev to 20k rpm and use direct drive which is not possible. The hybrid/EV torque figures are consistent with Toyota's own data.
 
Last edited:
M

Motor

Expert
Messages
2,408
Reactions
3,420
pressroom.lexus.com

NEW F SPORT VARIATIONS, MULTIMEDIA ON 2023 LEXUS ES - Lexus USA Newsroom

PLANO, Texas (Oct. 21, 2022) – The Lexus ES continues to offer guests bountiful choices to fit their personalized interests, passions and lifestyles for the 2023 model year. As the top-selling sedan in the brand’s lineup, the Lexus ES returns […]
pressroom.lexus.com pressroom.lexus.com

  • F SPORT Design and Handling grades provide appealing options
  • Redesigned center console to make room for more intuitive technology
  • Adds Lexus Interface multimedia system across the ES family
  • Starting MSRP of $42,490 on ES 350, 250 AWD
 
You must log in or register to reply here.