RichieRich
Founding Member
- Messages
- 36
- Reactions
- 58
To put in real simple terms, it's called the trickle down effect. Saves a great deal in development like spwolf said.
uh, you are looking at this completely wrong my friend.
Point of TNGA is to cut costs, especially capital costs and invest them back into the vehicles to be more competitive vs competition.
Steering wheel of LS is exactly great example - LS has high end steering wheel, and cheap UX has been able to get very similar wheel because they cut other overall costs of the vehicle. LS did not get UX wheel, it is other way around. And wow you end up with luxury steering wheel in UX, while in X1 competition steering wheel looks like it came from Toyota, and lets not even talk about base level on board computer which looks like it is from Yugo.
So with them cutting development costs of UX and ES and C-HR, etc, they managed to put more tech, more engines, more luxury into the same price. Unlike before, where to get lower price, they cut interior and engine tech in cheaper vehicles, so you ended up with 4 speed automatic or brittle plastics in Corolla.
It is pretty exciting actually, and completely opposite from them cost cutting their cars.
I agree Gecko. Lexus has been behind the eight ball for some time now. They use to be upfront. (Besides the LC)I completely understand and agree with what you are saying, but as Lexus has been making some questionable decisions at the top end of their portfolio aside from LC, you start to end up with very competitive entry level and mid level products, and then flagship products that seem less special. It used to be very different, but as you note - this move is benefitting their cars at the bottom end, so I guess more people win out with that formula.
The LS doesn't get any less special because somehow the UX has a similar steering wheel. You don't get hard plastics rear doors on a LS. You don't get hand-cut glass or 3.5 turbocharged engine on an ES. It's exactly like before when you won't find a V8 and massage seats in anything but the LS. Improving your low end products doesn't make the flagship any less desirable.
I just don't think the LS evolved as much, so the perceived "gap" between something like an ES and LS is just a lot smaller now than it was before.
I completely understand and agree with what you are saying, but as Lexus has been making some questionable decisions at the top end of their portfolio aside from LC, you start to end up with very competitive entry level and mid level products, and then flagship products that seem less special. It used to be very different, but as you note - this move is benefitting their cars at the bottom end, so I guess more people win out with that formula.
It's way better than the SCLASS or BMW.. my only question is the steering still power/tilt and telescope on its own?
Honestly the LS 500 is DOA for me because of lacking V8, the strange thing is that they already keep putting the 5.0l V8 engine in the LC and not giving it to the LS, Lexus continuing the same stupidity that making both GS and IS near dead now
Morning.. Isn't that 5.0 Liter V8 Dated though? I mean the TTV6 has more HP and torque that put together. I think it has the same amount of HP but it has more Torque than the V8. I would go drive it if you haven't already before making any assumptions like that because you are going to be very surprised. The TTV6 is no joke.
Thanks Ian! do you know if it moves on its own or is there a button you can control it with?