I hate to be so direct, but at this point, do you think Lexus really cares about enthusiasts anymore? I don't.
Are you asking for badge-engineering -- merely rebranding one model by making minimal changes to make a new model? This is what got GM into trouble and what -- until recently -- kept buyers away from Lincoln, because they were too much like Fords.Is it so much more expensive to rebrand a higher-end Toyota into a Lexus, just like the Harrier to the Toyota Venza Hybrid which already looks fantastic on the outside?
What features in a Lexus are lacking in a Toyota besides the Lexus TVD and massage seats and the L instead of a T?
Is this a more crude, primitive type of brake-based torque vectoring?
Venza’s handling is bolstered by an electronically controlled brake system featuring Active Cornering Assist (ACA), which engages the stability control to reduce understeer in certain cornering situations. The driver feels only the enhanced agility, not the system’s operation.
Are you asking for badge-engineering -- merely rebranding one model by making minimal changes to make a new model? This is what got GM into trouble and what -- until recently -- kept buyers away from Lincoln, because they were too much like Fords.
Badge-engineering is what enthusiasts do NOT want.
This is just not the case.
Happy to read your opinion or facts if you have some.
Happy to read your opinion or facts if you have some.
Because Lexus is not an enthusiast brand.....Lexus is a luxury brand.
Lol ok, so then you agree with me?
I don't agree with you.....There is lots of enthusiasm at Lexus, but it depends on what you want or what you find appealing...UX I think is very appealing in both design and efficiency (Just can't get over the size of the rear hatch)....I have always liked Lexus body on frame stuff, especially thrilled that they still offer full time 4WD......and going towards their LS....I find it astonishing that the LS still retains the Torsen differential for the awd set up in both 500 or 500h lines....also, if you read up on the LS500 engine, one of the most advanced engines available. What is your big beef about a lack of enthusiasm?
Why do I keep hearing German lease offers etc etc? I don't understand.
It was an interesting jab but one relatively well known. In Europe they subsidize heavy and in America they do as well. BMW moved to a leasing and incentive model which changed the luxury landscape. Couple that with chasing sales and well everyone had to compete or be left behind.
It wasn't too long ago their leases also included scheduled maintenance.
So which emerging markets can we get free maintenance? If you have proof, let's see it. Otherwise, you are making up facts.Thanks. Never really paid much attention to the German leasing thing....I know Lexus does not offer free mainenance in the North America, but some emerging markets I think they do. I think the days of chasing sales are over...it will all be about profit and transaction prices.
Automotive News has published its full interview with new Toyota North America CEO Ted Ogawa after posting an except last month, and it’s a fascinating read from start to finish. Of course, we will focus on the Lexus-specific information:
Ogawa: I have no worries about the Toyota lineup, but in the case of Lexus, the cadence is an issue. So for this year, the LC convertible is new. Profitwise, it may be OK, but in this sense, the Lexus dealer body wants to see more product sooner.
AN: How will you change that within Lexus?
Ogawa: We need to change the cadence and the product and the powertrain. Cadence is a planning concept, so that’s a No. 1 priority. And then product, next to the powertrain, right now is a second order.
On a day when Toyota announces two all-new vehicles (the...
Just a thought, anyone surprised that Toyota is moving full steam ahead with virtual product launches, while Lexus has postponed their 3.3/4th Gen IS series? Is this to do with how close each vehicle is to start of production?
For one of the most senior Toyota executives in the world to publicly state that Lexus/Lexus dealers "may be OK profitwise" is rather shocking. Then the follow up comment about dealers wanting to see more product sooner is about as direct as we will ever get with contextual acknowledgement of profitability issues.