The chart clearly is sorted by displacement for the engines. Whether an engine has turbos or not is irrelevant to the chart. If the rumored engine ends up as a 2.5L, it makes zero sense for it to be listed as a separate engine on the chart. That would simply mean it's a turbo version of the A25A.
...Likewise a 2.0L turbo engine wouldn't make sense to be listed as a separate engine on the chart, because again that would simply be a turbo version of the M20A.
...Look at the chart carefully again. It confirms a total of 9 Dynamic Force engines, and 17 variants. A 2.5L turbo or new 2.0L turbo would be simply variants of already debuted Dynamic Force engines...
...A slightly reworked A25A or slightly reworked M20A will not be considered a new engine. The technical documents from Toyota's powertrain department make it clear that Dynamic Force fundamentally comprises a number of base engine architectures (9 engines) and a number of variants stemming from those base architectures (17 variants). To save resources, all Dynamic Force engines use a common basic engine architecture philosophy but then each engine architecture gets a number of changes based on need. From there variants like turbocharged versions stem out. If a major reworking of the A25A or M20A includes a displacement change, well yes then that would be considered a different engine under the Dynamic Force family.
This would be like saying the 2GR-FKS should be named under a different engine family than the 2GR-FE or 2GR-FSE. These variants have a number of moderate changes inside of them, yet they are not major enough to be called a different engine family, they are all part of the same engine family.
I wholeheartedly, 100% agree with this. VERY well said.
If it's a 2.4L turbo, then that would be a separate engine from the A25A...
Only a 2.4L turbo would be considered as a separate engine, since no 2.4L Dynamic Force engine has debuted.
Here, on the other hand, I
might beg to differ. It so happens that the M20A, A25A and V35A Dynamic Force engines have, thus far, only been released in a single displacement. But what if the rumored 2.4-liter turbo is nothing more than a boosted version of the A25A with thicker cylinder liners (to better withstand the added pressures of turbocharging) that effectively reduce its displacement to 2.4-liters? Wouldn't it still be part of the AxxA engine family?
This happened with the 2nd-gen Audi A6, whose 2.8-liter naturally aspirated V6 was downsized slightly to a 2.7 when turbocharged.
I was talking about the other mystery engine on the chart between the A25A and V35A that is bigger in displacement that the A25A.
It could be a new NA 2.7 4cyl for the Tacoma. That thing is about as outdated as the 1UR in the Tundra.
I agree that a replacement for the ancient TR truck engine family (current offered in 1TR-FE 2-liter and 2TR-FE 2.7-liter guises) in most of Toyota's body-on-frame models worldwide is the likeliest engine to slot between the A25A and V35A engines.
As to the 2 yet-to-be-released engines above the V35A, I just don't see 2 separate V6 or V8 engine families. Currently, pre-Dynamic Force V6s are down to a single GR engine family (in displacements from 2.5 to 4 liters) and V8s to a single UR family (in displacements from 4.6 to 5.7 liters). My best guess for the two slots above the V35A V6 is a new Dynamic Force V8 family to replace UR and a Dynamic Force Diesel to replace the 1VD-FTV 4.5-liter diesel V8 in a number of Land Cruisers and Lexus LXs.
Yes, I know that Toyota is discontinuing the diesel option for its cars and crossovers, but there appears to be a need for a large diesel option for body-on-frame vehicles. Notably, the official TNGA/Dynamic Force Toyota news releases and documents (like CIF, I've read them all) are silent on the subject of a potential Dynamic Force diesel.