maiaramdan
Expert
- Messages
- 1,811
- Reactions
- 1,419
+1I think the new ES looks a lot cleaner then the LS. I can't wait to see the interior.
The new LS styling never grow on me
I think it was supposed to be either LS+ or LF-FC
But not this
+1I think the new ES looks a lot cleaner then the LS. I can't wait to see the interior.
This is a hybrid model, and like with the previous generation ES hybrid, Lexus attempts to make hybrids seem like they have better performance by giviing them a sporty body kit.Honestly WTH is that trunk spoiler, so bulky and out of place.
the side profile of the current-gen ES looks like an overweight pig when compared with the new model lol...
Dear god what is with those front overhangs?:weary_face: What an absolute mess, it's totally going to ruin the balance of the car.ensive:
I don't think its nearly as bad as you're blowing it out to be.
You don't see the "overhang" looking at the car from a human eye level perspective. You only see it when the photos are taken directly from the side from a toddler's point of view.
Thats why people always hate on cars when they see it from the new release photos but when they begin to see it in person, the design begins to "grow" on them.
Its very common.
I wish they were a lot shorter. It ruins balance for handling, and puts way too much stress on the front wheels. It's not like they will put a V8 or even the Twin-Turbo V6. This is why it's completely pointless to have large overhangs.
The torque steer alone is enough to put off many customers.
I am calling it right now, unless they don't put full attention to address this issue, then they're screwed.
Very true. Such a long overhang is completely unneccesary and beats the primary advantage of a transverse platform: better space efficiency due to compact powertrain. Recent Lexus designs are heavily form over function, which I am not a big fan of. Even the GS has a completely non-longitudinal-RWD-looking overhang.
These statements are rather exaggerated. Very few drivers in real world will actually drive the car hard enough to experience that torque steer; traction control and stability control will mostly keep it in check. It's like saying "power oversteer alone is enough to put off many customers" on a longitudinal RWD car.
Will a higher power ES work? We don't really know. But AWD does solve a lot of problems.
This is a hybrid model, and like with the previous generation ES hybrid, Lexus attempts to make hybrids seem like they have better performance by giviing them a sporty body kit.
the side profile of the current-gen ES looks like an overweight pig when compared with the new model lol...
Very true. Such a long overhang is completely unneccesary and beats the primary advantage of a transverse platform: better space efficiency due to compact powertrain. Recent Lexus designs are heavily form over function, which I am not a big fan of. Even the GS has a completely non-longitudinal-RWD-looking overhang.
These statements are rather exaggerated. Very few drivers in real world will actually drive the car hard enough to experience that torque steer; traction control and stability control will mostly keep it in check. It's like saying "power oversteer alone is enough to put off many customers" on a longitudinal RWD car.
Will a higher power ES work? We don't really know. But AWD does solve a lot of problems.
I agree with your statement. However I can tell the difference between a hideously long overhang to something a lot more manageable. Its sister car, the Avalon, has much shorter overhangs. The Camry too, has massive overhangs, you even can see it in commercials.
I wish they were a lot shorter. It ruins balance for handling, and puts way too much stress on the front wheels. It's not like they will put a V8 or even the Twin-Turbo V6. This is why it's completely pointless to have large overhangs. Also, I am calling it right now, despite everything going to be better with this new ES, there will be many complaints about the stupid torque steer. 300+ horsepower is too much of a burden for those poor front wheels to take, and completely destroys the luxury driving impressions for the ES. Sure, it will become an order of magnitude sportier, but it will come up short in terms of luxury driving feel. The torque steer alone is enough to put off many customers. This is why I keep saying they need to switch to a RWD platform. Hell, even if they don't, a longitudinal FWD platform is much better than the transverse platform we see in the current car.
I am calling it right now, unless they don't put full attention to address this issue, then they're screwed. However on the bright side, there are generally no heavy hitting competitors for the ES, so if they actually release a new GS, they may shift to that car instead, simply because the platform is more superior for a luxury sedan. Or in the case of the new ES, a luxury (sports) sedan.
Why are you so convinced of this? Admittedly, you could be right. I just don't see ES becoming a credible GS replacement (especially in Europe) unless it offers an AWD option, though. And even if next week's Beijing 7ES launch is nothing but "regular" and hybrid FWD variants, I'll hold off on the pitchforks for a bit. It's possible that sportier AWD and F-Sport 7ES variants could be saved for a separate event or later launch.And there is no way the ES would come with an AWD system . It will be available only as FWD mid-size sedan.
Why are you so convinced of this? Admittedly, you could be right. I just don't see ES becoming a credible GS replacement (especially in Europe) unless it offers an AWD option, though. And even if next week's Beijing 7ES launch is nothing but "regular" and hybrid FWD variants, I'll hold off on the pitchforks for a bit. It's possible that sportier AWD and F-Sport 7ES variants could be saved for a separate event or later launch.
I agree with your statement. However I can tell the difference between a hideously long overhang to something a lot more manageable. Its sister car, the Avalon, has much shorter overhangs. The Camry too, has massive overhangs, you even can see it in commercials.
I wish they were a lot shorter. It ruins balance for handling, and puts way too much stress on the front wheels. It's not like they will put a V8 or even the Twin-Turbo V6. This is why it's completely pointless to have large overhangs. Also, I am calling it right now, despite everything going to be better with this new ES, there will be many complaints about the stupid torque steer. 300+ horsepower is too much of a burden for those poor front wheels to take, and completely destroys the luxury driving impressions for the ES. Sure, it will become an order of magnitude sportier, but it will come up short in terms of luxury driving feel. The torque steer alone is enough to put off many customers. This is why I keep saying they need to switch to a RWD platform. Hell, even if they don't, a longitudinal FWD platform is much better than the transverse platform we see in the current car.
I am calling it right now, unless they don't put full attention to address this issue, then they're screwed. However on the bright side, there are generally no heavy hitting competitors for the ES, so if they actually release a new GS, they may shift to that car instead, simply because the platform is more superior for a luxury sedan. Or in the case of the new ES, a luxury (sports) sedan.
I wish it was an exaggeration, because these are issues that reviewers and owners alike have reported from the 2018 Camry. I wouldn't waste my time here to spew anything but the truth here to be honest. Think of it like this. It will be the achilles heel for the new ES if they don't address the issue.
Lexus simply does not care about front overhangs anymore. Look at UX and RX - both are terrible and quite foolish looking. FWD cars + spindle grill is a bad combination for design and Lexus has chosen form over function. It is what it is, unfortunately. It looks quite ridiculous.
The point is they are by no means screwed by going transverse FWD. It will have close to zero impact on the financial side.