REVEALED! 8th Generation Lexus ES Megathread (ES 350h, ES 350e, ES 500e)

CRSKTN

Expert
Messages
2,405
Reactions
4,019
The FT1 was a toyota sister to what would become the LC500 i imagine.

And yes toyota has always intentionally hampered and sandbagged lexus and is now atrophying and absorbing the brand.
 

spwolf

Expert
Messages
3,582
Reactions
3,489
By "sports sedans" I guess they meant the Civic Si

I think in one of the interviews, they point out how they want it to have reserved acceleration.
Ie RZ is much faster 0-60 with similar powertrains, they wanted to make this slower response due to older age of its occupants.
 

spwolf

Expert
Messages
3,582
Reactions
3,489
It's still kinda crazy that TMC would bring out a car in 2023 that only get an acceptable rating in the small overlap crash test when there are cars from 5-6 years ago that offer better protection for its occupants.


it happens, TMC usually engineers for crash standards, which means when new ones are introduced, they might be behind.
 
Messages
33
Reactions
77
I think in one of the interviews, they point out how they want it to have reserved acceleration.
Ie RZ is much faster 0-60 with similar powertrains, they wanted to make this slower response due to older age of its occupants.
Or….hear me out. You can have both, with well-tuned drive modes that provide either restrained or thrilling driving experiences. Im not versed with hardware and software but I’d imagine that with EVs it has never been easier to achieve this.
 
Last edited:

sl0519

Admirer
Messages
692
Reactions
1,299
I think in one of the interviews, they point out how they want it to have reserved acceleration.
Ie RZ is much faster 0-60 with similar powertrains, they wanted to make this slower response due to older age of its occupants.

A very lame excuse… it’s like they’re using "reliability" as an excuse to just keep reusing old parts forever instead of actually inventing new powertrains and chassis.
 

spwolf

Expert
Messages
3,582
Reactions
3,489
A very lame excuse… it’s like they’re using "reliability" as an excuse to just keep reusing old parts forever instead of actually inventing new powertrains and chassis.

I agree with you, but since this is similar powertrain or same as RZ, they literally are concerned about instant reaponse.

That's what legacy for me, this concern that you have to pay a lot more to get more, ie how VW tunes their exactly the same platform for different performance between Skoda, Seat, VW, Audi and Porsche and we have to pretend that Porsche is faster to charge or go while using exactly the same hardware.

Where Tesla, Byd, Geely or whoever simply does not have to care about that.

They just build what they can build for that cost, no 100 years of politics involved.
 

ssun30

Expert
Messages
3,853
Reactions
8,576
I think in one of the interviews, they point out how they want it to have reserved acceleration.
Ie RZ is much faster 0-60 with similar powertrains, they wanted to make this slower response due to older age of its occupants.
If they are just trying to appeal to older customers, maybe don't pretend it's a sports sedan?

Lexus wants to charge the "sportiness" premium without actually making a sporty product. We are too familiar with that strategy, and we are tired of it.
 

CRSKTN

Expert
Messages
2,405
Reactions
4,019
If Toyota thought they could get away with selling a box that says "Car" on it, they would.
If they could convince people to pay extra for a hat that says "I have no standards and more money than taste", they would do it 24/7/365.

edit: :mad:
 
Last edited:

Kelvin2020

Admirer
Messages
856
Reactions
1,984

internalaudit

Expert
Messages
1,227
Reactions
1,180
If they are just trying to appeal to older customers, maybe don't pretend it's a sports sedan?

Lexus wants to charge the "sportiness" premium without actually making a sporty product. We are too familiar with that strategy, and we are tired of it.
I'm a sucker for torque vectoring differential but the RCF with TVD wasn't on my radar because I can't have two-seaters. Please Lexus, at least come up with a few mid-tiered vehicles that come with this. I bet even with less than stellar suspension tuning, theses cars will drive better.

Not everyone who wants a more advanced differential want to race or track (90% vehicle, 10% talent) anyway.
 

spwolf

Expert
Messages
3,582
Reactions
3,489
If they are just trying to appeal to older customers, maybe don't pretend it's a sports sedan?

Lexus wants to charge the "sportiness" premium without actually making a sporty product. We are too familiar with that strategy, and we are tired of it.

They literally said in the interview that they did not want to make it a sports sedan.
In fact, there will be no F Sport version of this.
 

ssun30

Expert
Messages
3,853
Reactions
8,576
They literally said in the interview that they did not want to make it a sports sedan.
In fact, there will be no F Sport version of this.
Then they shouldn't mention it has performance "on par with sports sedans" because it's not. Saying these kinds of things in interviews just show how clueless they are about the market. It's even more humiliating that a product actually sold as "F-Sport Performance" is slower than this ES "absolutely not sport sedan".

They are selling an "old people car" and they should be honest about it.
 

carguy420

Admirer
Messages
969
Reactions
1,300
Even the 2nd gen IS350 from over 20 years ago is 0.1 second quicker from 0-100 kph than the ES500e. The only sports/sporty sedans that the ES500e are somewhat on par with are the Subaru WRX and the most basic models of the 3 german executive sedans. Lexus sure is aiming low lol, needing a top end variant to fight other brands' base models.
 

sl0519

Admirer
Messages
692
Reactions
1,299
We get it, it's an old man's car - but is this seriously the only thing you're putting out? It's 2025 and your powertrain is still stuck in 2010. Then you have the nerve to say in interviews that it's on par with a sports sedan? Get outta here
 

mediumhot

Admirer
Messages
597
Reactions
738
Then they shouldn't mention it has performance "on par with sports sedans" because it's not. Saying these kinds of things in interviews just show how clueless they are about the market. It's even more humiliating that a product actually sold as "F-Sport Performance" is slower than this ES "absolutely not sport sedan".

They are selling an "old people car" and they should be honest about it.

F-Sport Performance moniker is US marketing thing applicable to the most US centric Lexus models and it has trickled down only to few markets outside of US. That's what makes it confusing. RX500h F Sport Performance is sold just as RX500h F Sport in majority of the markets. Upcoming RZ550e F Sport will be the quickest Lexus model in the lineup this year but it will not carry F Sport Performance badge because RZ is not a product made for US market in mind. Maybe Lexus USA decides to brand it as F Sport Performance when it gets to US but that's just a wild guess on my part.

Anyway its a safe bet that ES will come in F Sport trim sometime down the line. ES550e F Sport is pretty much guaranteed.
 

internalaudit

Expert
Messages
1,227
Reactions
1,180
Don't even care about the acceleration or road holding numbers. Just make them drive up to 85% of German makes with a third of the upkeep and hopefully starting 10-15% less since the Yen has depreciated even while it's slowly inching up.
 

ssun30

Expert
Messages
3,853
Reactions
8,576
The more you look at the "Chinese rebadges" the more you see how lazy the ES interior design is.

Mazda EZ-60 (rebadge of Deepal S07) uses a bezel-less dual screen design, which is not available on the S07.
20250423_mazda_ez-60_chn_int02_l.jpg
It also has zero-gravity seats with built-in speakers.
20250423_mazda_ez-60_chn_int06_l.jpg

BTW the Chinese-market Camry already has the upgraded interior features found on the ES: "responsive hidden switches" and "sensory concierge" (i.e. mood lights and fragrance dispenser). The Camry also has AR-HUD and gesture controls.
11.jpg
14.jpg
1.jpg
 

CRSKTN

Expert
Messages
2,405
Reactions
4,019