Tragic Bronson
Expert
- Messages
- 2,971
- Reactions
- 3,590
SarcasmWhat is the point of your picture?
SarcasmWhat is the point of your picture?
I don't think it's desperation but I meant offer really compelling products while at the same time, providing the option of longer financing terms at lower rates.
If something is not compelling enough, nothing will happen to sales even with a -2% 120 month terms.
Spwolf stated that these sales programs are detrimental, yet Lexus does too so its not unusual. Only ones that don't (at least publicly) are Lamborghini, Rolls Royce, etc. Lexus use them as much as any other brand, especially with the RX, ES, NX and even UX. Lease specials and low interest financing are part of the game, not to mention plenty of manufacturer to dealer incentives as well. That cuts into Lexus division profits. I would think in China and Europe, their ATPs (average transaction prices) are higher than here since it is well known that if you shop hard enough on any luxury vehicle, you can get a pretty good discount. What Johnny L said, sounds extremely believable about the amount of NX's sold with cash on the 'hood'. My dad's ES was purchased similarly, with a very sizable discount off invoice price, which is meaningless these days.spwolf said:You have great financing deals when you are desperate to sell cars and then lose your profitability. Not other way around - you are not profitable if you sell cars with huge incentives.
Mods remove if inappropriate, but I couldnt help but think of this for some reason
I think the complaint people have with Lexus is either you have the F Sport package or the Executive package when maybe it's best to offer an Ultimate package. Of course, one cannot have comfort and stiff suspension without AVS.
They should allow AVS on ECO and normal driving modes too because I would rarely set a vehicle to Sport++ and burn extra fuel I really don't need to. Or simpler, allow various driver set combinations instead of just factory preset ones. People like choices.
Agree. The fact that you cannot get an LS F Sport with some type of wood trim and only limited interior colors is crazy to me. My dream would be a matte black wood trim that is exclusive to the F sport paired with a brown leather.
I know I’ve said this before but I think the luxury market is pretty tapped out in America. Also TESLA came out of nowhere the last ten years and sold a crap load of vehicles. No one saw that coming. No one.
I think 300-330k is the Max and is an insane number of luxury vehicles from one brand. That was the total market 3 decades ago.
As Gecko stated and what I’m seeing talked about is the COVID-19 crisis has dealerships reassessing things. Volume became the key metric it seems and not profit. Well good luck with volume today.
And I’ll be quite frank I think there’s just too damn many luxury cars around new and used. Doesn’t feel nowhere was special as 20-30 years ago. They are too attainable and don’t conjure up feelings of luxury as everyone chased volume. That is one thing I love about the LX or the LC or even LS. They are rare. Look at how even AMG bastardized things with slapping AMG on. 43/53 etc cars... all for the sake of volume.
Definitely, lower level models only did add to the brands' appeal, thanks to brand cachet. Websites like Leasehackr help would be buyers find deals, so MSRP is not a factor at all when you shop on monthly payments and money factor, where many times, you can find a lease on a nice vehicle for the price of a Corolla.Something else that is interesting to me as an observer:
Years ago when vehicles like the 1 Series, 2 Series, X1, X2, A Class, GLA, CLA, A3 and Q3 were launched, many people (including ToMoCo executives) said Lexus "Wasn't going downmarket because they don't need to" and made jabs about Lexus being a more premium brand that didn't need to go below the $30k mark with product. That sounded good at the time.
What we have seen since then is Lexus' brand cache sliding and the Germans, especially Audi, becoming stronger and more desirable than they ever were with products like X7, 8 Series, upcoming X8, X6, GLE Coupe, revamped GLS, S Coupe and convertible, AMG everything, Q8, S/RS lines, A5 Sportback, eTron, etc. So in my opinion, I don't really think lower end product has impacted the desirability or "prestige factor" of Mercedes, BMW and Audi.
Losing the GS may not mean much saleswise, but it is becoming a cult Lexus vehicle. Lexus SHOULD find away to bring it back because it still has equity, but at this point, the folks didn't know what else to do with it after stuffing the 2URGSE.I am not grinding this axe, but losing GS (ES is still seen as an entry level product), GX being 10 years old, 5LS product issues, UX execution, lack of F products, the shift to CUVs with a dated CUV/SUV lineup and a reluctance to join new segments (CUV coupes, performance CUVs, 4 door coupes) have drug Lexus down more than the Germans for offering cheaper products.
Jaguar: The brand is the sore spot for Tata, their crossovers are struggling to be relevant when Land Rover is about to launch the Defender with much fanfare and buyers are more attracted to 100K RRs than 10 year old Land Cruisers.I really don't know what the perfect mix is with affordability, approachability and cache. Jaguar offers a limited and more expensive lineup, but is struggling to survive. Cadillac changes their approach every two quarters. Infiniti... are they going to make it out of 2020? Acura may have something of a product resurgence on the horizon, but even if it is well received, the brand has a long way to go. Genesis was a good idea at a bad time, with the wrong product for a CUV-driven market shift. Lincoln has fizzled out again.
Still great to be #3, but Lexus was always striding to be #1. The growth is in the SUVs right now, and old tech in luxury vehicles pushes buyers away.Comparatively, Lexus is still in a good position, but it's going to take time, focus and a significant amount of R&D to fix their problems. The vehicles with the biggest upside and ability to positively impact the brand and market IMO are: next gen ES, NX and RX, refreshed LS and the next LX. Some key updates for the LS with an all new LX will go a long way for Lexus' flagship appeal. The importance of a production LF-1 also cannot be understated.
Still great to be #3, but Lexus was always striding to be #1. The growth is in the SUVs right now, and old tech in luxury vehicles pushes buyers away.
Lexus states they never sought to be #1. They are happy with it but didn’t aim for it.
With the Germans, you will pay more, but you'll be able to have exactly what you desire. That type of customization and ability to easily add on options and packages piles on the profit QUICKLY.
I specced out a comparably equipped S-Class and 7-Series with their online builders before I went with the LS500 and while they still offer more standalone options than Lexus, it's not like it was even 10 years ago. Many of the standalone things require that you have specific packages first, and it's not always obvious why.
I wish they would do more bespoke models. In Japan, the process is exactly the way you describe, and that's for any Japanese made car at least, not just luxury brands. I prefer that since you can spec the car exactly the way you want. Special orders for American dealers, you need to wrangle some dealers to do so.Lexus dealers are not really interested in custom orders on vehicles on the upper segements (LS, LX) in certain regions of the globe. It`d be nice to have a more accommodating setting for customers in that segment.
Lexus dealers are not really interested in custom orders on vehicles on the upper segements (LS, LX) in certain regions of the globe. It`d be nice to have a more accommodating setting for customers in that segment.