Rendered: The Lexus Luxury Minivan

Posted by Kevin on April 7th, 2019

There’s every expectation that Lexus will reveal a minivan at next week’s Shanghai Motor Show, and Nikita Chuiko from Russian website Kolesa has taken the teaser image and transformed it into two full-size renders — here’s what the van could look like from the rear:

Lexus Minivan LM Rear

(The forum conversation revolving around the minivan has been divisive, to say the least — for every member that has bought into the idea of Lexus creating a minivan for the Chinese market, there’s another that doesn’t see a fit with a brand so focused on performance and design.)

ChinaPhotochops
Popular Stories

Sorry. No data so far.

Comments
Joaquin Ruhi
I know it's just a Russian artist's conception of what an Alphard-based Lexus minivan could look like, but I think it looks way better than I would've anticipated. It'll be interesting to see how it compares to the real thing (provided, of course, the Lexus is launched in Shanghai on the 16th).
zeusus
Joaquin Ruhi
I know it's just a Russian artist's conception of what an Alphard-based Lexus minivan could look like, but I think it looks way better than I would've anticipated. It'll be interesting to see how it compares to the real thing (provided, of course, the Lexus is launched in Shanghai on the 16th).
Rendering looks good, pretty much as expected.

Lexus made the spindle work on the LX, and not only did it work but the execution was great.

I'm still not sure if this minivan was an April Fools joke or not but I hope its real and not much doubt in my mind that it will look good.
flexus
zeusus
Rendering looks good, pretty much as expected.

Lexus made the spindle work on the LX, and not only did it work but the execution was great.

I'm still not sure if this minivan was an April Fools joke or not but I hope its real and not much doubt in my mind that it will look good.
Don't worry there's no such thing as April's fool in Asia :)
S
^^Yes we do.
krew
krew

Rendered: The Lexus Luxury Minivan
[​IMG]

Imagining the Lexus MPV.
View the original article post
R
Should sell well in certain countries - a bit too much grille for my taste in these renderings would like the hood to come down further so that the grille is not quite so overpowering visually - otherwise looks very good.
S
Yes，it is Lexus LM，a flagship luxury MPV！
www.lexus.com.cn/node/3855
krew
krew

Lexus LM Luxury Minivan to Debut at Shanghai Motor Show
[​IMG]

It's official.
View the original article post
Joaquin Ruhi
For comparison, here are the lightened Lexus LM teaser (top) and a side view of the Toyota Alphard (bottom);

[​IMG]

mwyf
Joaquin Ruhi
For comparison, here are the lightened Lexus LM teaser (top) and a side view of the Toyota Alphard (bottom);

[​IMG]

One step first closer to confirming my fears - I really hope it's not a rebadge job with some tarting up on the inside. It needs a quintessentially Lexus design inside out. If this turns out to be a rebadge, then there'll be Alphard, Vellfire, Lexus LM - are 3 flavours necessary for vans?
S
Alphard usually outsells complete lexus lineup, so I guess yes?

It will definitely be lexus version of Alphard on the outside, I hope they change front dash, only thing not up to date there
Joe
mwyf
One step first closer to confirming my fears - I really hope it's not a rebadge job with some tarting up on the inside. It needs a quintessentially Lexus design inside out. If this turns out to be a rebadge, then there'll be Alphard, Vellfire, Lexus LM - are 3 flavours necessary for vans?
Oh dear... Based on that teaser, I am afraid that you're right... :eek::scream::bomb: I am very curious to see what Lexus designers can come up with based on the awful Alphard design.
Joaquin Ruhi
mwyf
If this turns out to be a rebadge, then there'll be Alphard, Vellfire, Lexus LM - are 3 flavours necessary for vans?
Well, the Japanese domestic market offers 3 different flavors (Noah, Voxy and Esquire) for Toyota's smaller minivan. And commentary in our C-HR thread informs us that FAW Toyota China is launching the Vellfire at Auto Shanghai as a counterpart to the GAC Toyota Alphard.

Even as Toyota promises eventual consolidation of its 4 separate Japanese sales channels (implicitly eliminating duplicate variants of the same basic vehicle), the internecine rivalry between FAW and GAC in China ensures that there will be duplicate Toyotas for the foreseeable future.
flexus
Hope they export this to ASEAN. They could overthrow Germans with this. LM will bring new customers and would introduce brand to many people. When they launched few weeks back luxury version of HiAce SE Asia's car media got VERY excited.
F1 Silver Arrows
By looking at the dip in the front that goes all the way down towards the bottom-front lip, you can tell this grille is going to be ridiculously massive. Oh no.
OlFius
Is this really a priority for Lexus?
I can imagine something more urgent (LF-1),
or will we have to wait another 4 years like with the UX?
Will1991
It feels like... We already know everything abut this car...
Y
ssun30
There is little incentive for them to jump to TNGA considering the only purpose of this model is to print money. The Alphard already is the best luxury minivan, period. The Alphard is relatively new and got its facelift last year with updated powertrains and interior. They cannot improve its competitiveness any further because there is no competitor.

We have to understand why the LM exists. This thing is targeted at the chinese market specifically, where the Alphard is a Veblen good: a luxury item that gets more popular the more expensive it gets. It reached that status because it is the best luxury minivan by a long shot. In JDM it costs between $35-55k (although there is a $150k special trim for VIP transport), but in China the MSRP is $120k and the average transaction price is $170k. Dealership add huge markups on them due to huge demand and limited supply. People who buy an Alphard would never compare it to a Mercedes V-Class, a Buick GL8 Avenir, or a Nissan Quest; they cross-shop it against Mercedes S-Class Maybach, Maserati Ghibli, and entry-level Bentleys, in which case $170k is a bargain. Even at such ridiculous prices they sold over one thousand of these a month, more than the LS, LX, and LC combined.

The LM will be the profit maximization machine for them, so they will do whatever they can to reduce costs. They could already command a ridiculous premium without a TNGA update because it is already the best. Let's just forget this stupidity and look at the bright side: it will be so profitable that it will pay for R&D for all their F models in the future.
Yes, and that's why I said I wouldn't be terribly surprised, but only terribly disappointed that Lexus isn't holding its brand name to a higher standard.
zeusus
ydooby
Yes, and that's why I said I wouldn't be terribly surprised, but only terribly disappointed, that Lexus isn't holding its brand name to a higher standard.
You mean like Mercedes does in Europe selling their cars cheap to be used as taxis?
flexus
zeusus
You mean like Mercedes does in Europe selling their cars cheap to be used as taxis?
A3->Golf->Octavia->Toledo
A4->Passat->Superb->Exeo
Q2->Troc->Kamiq
Macan->Q5->Tiguan->Kodiaq->Tarraco
List goes on and on
My neighbours' A5 and A6 didn't have leather seats lol 50k€ car
Y
zeusus
You mean like Mercedes does in Europe selling their cars cheap to be used as taxis?
I mean that the MC platform that the Alphard is based on is not only ancient but decidedly "cheap", unworthy of a premium brand, with low-grade steel used everywhere and low rigidity as a result. The new TNGA platform is much more premium-grade and worthy of use in a premium vehicle, but Toyota is able to keep its costs in line with the old platforms only because of its modular design enabling much better economy of scale. Since the current Alphard is already 4 years into the product cycle, Lexus should instead develop a new TNGA-based MPV which the next-generation Alphard can adopt in 2 years. The Mercedes taxis are still premium vehicles in my book because of the premium-grade platforms they're based on, despite being equipped with few amenities.
Trexus
flexus
A3->Golf->Octavia->Toledo
A4->Passat->Superb->Exeo
Q2->Troc->Kamiq
Macan->Q5->Tiguan->Kodiaq->Tarraco
List goes on and on
My neighbours' A5 and A6 didn't have leather seats lol 50k€ car
Q7->Atlas
Q8->Urus->Cayenne coupe
zeusus
ydooby
I mean that the MC platform that the Alphard is based on is not only ancient but decidedly "cheap", unworthy of a premium brand, with low-grade steel used everywhere and low rigidity as a result. The new TNGA platform is much more premium-grade and worthy of use in a premium vehicle, but Toyota is able to keep its costs in line with the old platforms only because of its modular design enabling much better economy of scale. Since the current Alphard is already 4 years into the product cycle, Lexus should instead develop a new TNGA-based MPV which the next-generation Alphard can adopt in 2 years. The Mercedes taxis, as well as many models in the VAG family, are still premium vehicles in my book because of the premium-grade platforms they're based on, despite being equipped with few amenities.
Great points, a superior platform is a superior platform. But at the same time...

How many actual Alphard buyers in Asia care about the difference between MC and TNGA platforms? Why is the Alphard so highly regarded by it's actual and potential buyers while at the same time, mild sentiments on extremely niche web forums are calling it cheap?
Ian Schmidt
OlFius
Is this really a priority for Lexus?
I can imagine something more urgent (LF-1),
or will we have to wait another 4 years like with the UX?
It's free money, and they don't appear to be putting much effort into the rebadge. So I don't think this is blocking LF-1, and the money it makes might help steer bean counter eyes away from the LC-F and Dynamic Force TTV8.
Ian Schmidt
zeusus
How many actual Alphard buyers in Asia care about the difference between MC and TNGA platforms? Why is the Alphard so highly regarded by it's actual and potential buyers while at the same time, mild sentiments on extremely niche web forums are calling it cheap?
I'm gonna pull out one of my least-favorite social media-isms here because it fits: The *clap* LM *clap* isn't *clap* for *clap* us *clap* it's *clap* for *clap* Asia.
Gecko
ydooby
I mean that the MC platform that the Alphard is based on is not only ancient but decidedly "cheap", unworthy of a premium brand, with low-grade steel used everywhere and low rigidity as a result. The new TNGA platform is much more premium-grade and worthy of use in a premium vehicle, but Toyota is able to keep its costs in line with the old platforms only because of its modular design enabling much better economy of scale. Since the current Alphard is already 4 years into the product cycle, Lexus should instead develop a new TNGA-based MPV which the next-generation Alphard can adopt in 2 years. The Mercedes taxis, as well as many models in the VAG family, are still premium vehicles in my book because of the premium-grade platforms they're based on, despite being equipped with few amenities.
This is probably my biggest problem with the LM - it is a GM-esque desperate money grab: No type of engineering innovation, no flagship product development and not even keeping pace with Toyota's new philosophy, despite being a Lexus flagship product.

If any other brand launched a "flagship" product based on a platform that dates back two decades, we'd all be pointing fingers and laughing. Maybe they really don't need to invest much because it's a limited market product. Maybe they think they can just lightly rebadge the Alphard and win with that. But also, I don't really want to think of Lexus as a company that is rebadging old Toyota products to add to their flagship line. Since the Alphard is already 4 years old, it should be ready for a switch to TNGA in the next 1-2 years... while LM spends the next 6 on the MC platform? Sad.
Joaquin Ruhi
Gecko
Since the Alphard is already 4 years old, it should be ready for a switch to TNGA in the next 1-2 years... while LM spends the next 6 on the MC platform? Sad. Another missed Lexus opportunity to lead.
I wouldn't be that pessimistic. The 1st-gen LM might only be built in its about-to-debut form for 2 or 3 years and then fall into line with Alphard and Vellfire's 4th-generation which should debut around 2021-2022. Think back to Lexus' origins here in the U.S. The original ES was a 2-year-only barely-disguised-Camry stopgap until a better-differentiated, more luxurious and "properly Lexus" Toyota Windom-derived ES appeared.
A
I’m so proud that this really happened, lol
meth.ix
I don't think this can be classified as a minivan. LM =Luxury Multi-Purpose Vehicle. Minivans are typically passenger vehicles while this van would probably have 4-5 seats with lots of space since it is a flagship.
S
Gecko
Since the Alphard is already 4 years old, it should be ready for a switch to TNGA in the next 1-2 years... while LM spends the next 6 on the MC platform? Sad. Another missed Lexus opportunity to lead.
More like they waited too long on the LM so now it's an awkward time to launch it. They should have green-lit the vehicle right after the Alphard proved to be a tremendous success in China, but hindsight is 20/20. Three years ago nobody really knew the Alphard would go viral and outsell all luxury sedans sans the S-Class in 2019, its success was entirely a coincidence.

2018 would be a perfect moment together with the Alphard facelift so it is a year too late. I'm not that concerned since the LM is badge-engineered anyway so I wouldn't be surprised if the 1st-gen has a very short life cycle. There is no incentive for them to keep producing the LM on an old platform when the entire Alphard line switches to TNGA. The cost to maintain the old line may not be worth it.

S