im a bit confused, they derated the performance by a metric ton to achieve said range... what efficiency win would this be?
im a bit confused, they derated the performance by a metric ton to achieve said range... what efficiency win would this be?
He gets the clicks with as much the bait in the title...all the manufacturers see that, including Toyota/Lexus PR
So we have a guy who got popular for tech reviews. Decides to make more money and do car reviews.He is not a car guy. Not the first time he has hardly any idea what he is talking about.
Overall likes the RZ but most of his hang ups are on its low range. Which we knew about 18 months ago.
He gets the clicks with as much the bait in the title...all the manufacturers see that, including Toyota/Lexus PR
This is probably the only used BEV I will consider buying if I need a replacement car before 2028.
Battery will likely last 14 or more years easily with all the safeguards.
Good to know.I’m hearing updates coming too. So yeah range is meh for a first (technically second the UXe precedes it) but excited on how much better it can get.
I would like to see stuff like a red interior and digital mirror and adjustable glass roof option toegether. Maybe a luxury package for the rear as it’s decently spacious
Good to know.
TBH, because my next car purchase will be a BEV, it will likely be a Lexus. I think Toyota will get the software right much sooner than the competition.
The only feature that I would really like in a BEV that isn't mass-marketed is torque vectoring and hopefully 50/50 or slightly more RWD-biased AWD dynamics.
He is aweful when it come to reviewing phones, he is biased and his reviews are actually promotions so his word really doesn't mean ****Marqes Brownlee should stick with phones and stop doing car reviews, he's just awful when it comes to reviewing cars. For the most part watching him is basically like watching advertisements for whatever he's showing. I rarely ever click on his videos anymore even though YT suggests them to me.
Direct 4 is torque vectoring from front to rear axle and back but not from one side of the axle to another. Surprisingly, I watched an older BMW xDrive clip yesterday and noticed brake-based torque vectoring was being featured through some illustration as the vehicle didn't come with the M Sport Differential.I did have a premium demo for a few months #lexuspartner (i have to say that in instances like this now it’s not to brag) and it drove fantastic. I mean shockingly solid. Direct-4 is torque vectoring so it just takes corners at will. Premium is super under tired. It is the fastest Lexus not a V-8.
With a bit more power, some larger wheels and michelin pilot sport tires it could be quite interesting. The issue is NONE of these reviewers are pushing the car. All they do is complain about the range
To be fair.. if they push the car that's just going to reduce it's range even more
Direct 4 is torque vectoring from front to rear axle and back but not from one side of the axle to another. Surprisingly, I watched an older BMW xDrive clip yesterday and noticed brake-based torque vectoring was being featured with illustration as the vehicle didn't come with the M Sport Differential.
I think with many modern vehicles, brake-based torque vectoring is included. Ssun pointed that out to me that for Toyotas, it's ACA while on Hondas, its called AHA.
In any case, Direct 4 is still significantly better than the eAWD on Toyota and Lexus hybrids for sure. Just want one step further and have like the TVD from the RCF or eTVD with BorgWarner and Schaefer manufacturers for BEVs.