Tragic Bronson
Expert
- Messages
- 2,979
- Reactions
- 3,599
Maybe they should've because the outgoing Mirai is ugly, but the upcoming one is beautiful.Good catch! I am sure Toyota is not benchmarking Hyundai
Maybe they should've because the outgoing Mirai is ugly, but the upcoming one is beautiful.Good catch! I am sure Toyota is not benchmarking Hyundai
Good catch! I am sure Toyota is not benchmarking Hyundai
Google TranslateThe IS "F" model, which was in the predecessor but is not available in the current model, will be added at Big My Chen in October.
The engine installed is a V8, 5LNA that generates 481ps / 54.6kgm. Now I want to fully enjoy the charm of the large displacement NA.
Google Translate
Well, it does seems to have a more coupe-look.
Google Translate
Well, it does seems to have a more coupe-look.
Found it.do you have a link to the actual article
From here: https://mag-x.jp/2020/05/25/13812/
We can see this:
I would say it's a clear reference with a picture from an actual 4IS, could anyone help with the text translation?
From here: https://mag-x.jp/2020/05/25/13812/
We can see this:
I would say it's a clear reference with a picture from an actual 4IS, could anyone help with the text translation?
Sorry I can't help with actual translation, but I don't think there's anything really new here except for that warm silver car with its nose camoed in yellow. This is probably just the recent MagX future IS stories we've discussed in this thread making their way from their website to the print edition.From here: https://mag-x.jp/2020/05/25/13812/
We can see this:
I would say it's a clear reference with a picture from an actual 4IS, could anyone help with the text translation?
Look at the horizontal lines. It actually says EV within the IS cover blurb. (They're suggesting Lexus IS will eventually become a full EV in their recent stories). The PHEV is above the horizontal line and refers to a separate story (probably the next Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, going by the vehicle on the upper right corner of the illustration).I see PHEV somewhere there.
That was one of my possible guesses. Thanks for confirming it.It says that the model lifecycle is getting extended for three years until the EV sedan is ready.
Sorry I can't help with actual translation, but I don't think there's anything really new here except for that warm silver car with its nose camoed in yellow. This is probably just the recent MagX future IS stories we've discussed in this thread making their way from their website to the print edition.
Look at the horizontal lines. It actually says EV within the IS cover blurb. (They're suggesting Lexus IS will eventually become a full EV in their recent stories). The PHEV is above the horizontal line and refers to a separate story (probably the next Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, going by the vehicle on the upper right corner of the illustration).
That was one of my possible guesses. Thanks for confirming it.
They also mentioned the LC-F development is 'coming to a rapid conclusion'. However, the word they use (急転直下) is neutral (something is rapidly heading towards a good or bad conclusion) so I guess we have to read the actual article to tell.
Adding width is not usually associated with a mere facelift, unless it is only changing to wider front fenders. But if adding wider fenders also means an increase in the track, that is something more than a mere facelift.BestCar also has article on both IS-F and LC-F coming before end of the year.
Another BC article about new IS writing how it is surprising how many changes are coming into the facelift, even the width of the car will change which is large investment for a facelift.
Keep in mind that JDM mags are known to change their mind, often and quick
Adding width is not usually associated with a mere facelift, unless it is only changing to wider front fenders. But if adding wider fenders also means an increase in the track, that is something more than a mere facelift.
And what about those other "many changes"? If there are many more changes, that could have involved much engineering work done on the car, meaning more planning and more time involved to get this model on the road. A mere facelift takes about 2 or so years to plan and engineer; a more significant change takes 4 or more years to plan and engineer.
Many changes suggests that this will be a new model or significant changes to the existing platform (without switching to the TNGA platform). But why continue the IS on its existing platform?
If this is a mere facelift that will keep the current model going for 2 or 3 years, I can understand. But if this is a significant change that keeps the current platform going for another 5 or 6 years, why do it? Why was the planning and engineering time and effort not put into a totally new car on a new platform?