I agree that the LX did well in the test considering its age, but there's a reason why the Escalade won. This is clearly not the same GM that gave us junk for almost four decades. Although it is somewhat reflected in the 96K list price of the tested vehicle (second-most-expensive to the Range Rover), it is apparent that Cadillac did not spare material quality, engineering, or effort in designing it. This, compared to the (IMO) almost pitiful 1Gen Escalade, which was a sloppily-built, over-plasticized, rattle-and-squeak hasty response to the first Navigator.
Lexfather said:
Amazing it still has a column shifter though.
I don't think it is just retro-styling or design on Cadillac's part. Like minivans, vehicles of this type are designed to be large people-movers (though with SUV versatility), with plenty of interior room and space efficiency. A column shifter, while admittedly not sport-oriented (large SUVs, of course, aren't intended to be sports-machines) does help with front seat/console space efficiency, freeing up space on the console for things like cell phones, drinks, and other things one can't keep in their hands all the time....or that one shouldn't be messing with while driving. The column-shifter also allows for an easy-to-reach Tow/Haul mode button for the transmission when towing heavy trailers...the button is usually mounted on the very tip of the shifter. Though the Escalade, like the Navigator, primarily emphasizes luxury and people-moving, they are also large body-on-frame vehicles built off of full-size pickup trucks....so they can often tow the same kind of heavy loads that large pickups do, and have some of the same engines/transmissions.
I would, though, if it were up to me, toss two things in the Escalade, just as I would with all the other new Cadillacs......the CUE system and the finger-slide sensor-controls in the lower center-dash. I didn't care for those types of controls in the new Lincolns....don't with the Caddies, either.