Your absolutely correct, I was looking at some Car and Driver reviews of the Cadillac CTS V-sport, and of the GS F, (two separate articles) and let's just say the results were grim. The starting prices for these cars are 62k for the Caddy and 85k for the GS F, so already the GS better be miles better if it wants to justify costing 23k more! According to C&D, The Caddy got to 60 mph in 4.5 seconds, and the GS was just 0.1 seconds faster! This ain't so good, but maybe the V8 will bring the Lexus victory in the 1/4 mile right? WRONG! both cars finished the sprint in the exact same time, 12.9 seconds. Now don't get me wrong, speed isn't everything, and if both cars were to cost the same, the GS F would undoubtedly be the better car, with a far better engine and much better quality. However, they don't cost the same and the Caddy significantly undercuts the GS F. Come to think of it, all of the GS F's competitors, (E53 AMG, BMW M550i, Audi S6, and the Cadillac) outperform the GS F in outright performance and cost less. Really, everyone in this segment has given Lexus the middle finger. (I don't want anyone to take this as me hating on the GS F, it has undoubtedly the best engine in its class, and Matt Farah's review really well illustrates how good it is).