Gecko
Administrator
- Messages
- 4,910
- Reactions
- 11,845
I watched some of the reviews of the new X7 M60i yesterday and it made me wonder, once again, how Lexus chose "600" for this LX.
I have mentioned it before that I feel like the LS 500's tune of the V35A-FTS should have probably been "450" and if the LX/Land Cruiser's tune has so much torque, sure, maybe that one is "500". So LS 450 and LX 500. Upcoming GX could be 450 or 400... not sure anyone cares that much.
BMW "6" = "60i = 523hp, 553lb-ft
Lexus "6" = 600 = 409hp, 479lb-ft
Mercedes "580" = 483hp, 516lb-ft
Where I really start to scratch my head is whether or not an LX hybrid will ever exist. A while ago there was a rumor of a 483hp, 600+ lb-ft of torque "LX 750h" and I really hope Lexus doesn't try to go that route with nomenclature. If they were smart, they'd just leave it at LX 650h maybe.
Anyway, Lexus' over-inflated naming scheme makes no sense to me as anything other than a marketing ploy. I know turbos and electricity change the game of "naming after displacement" but... make it make sense.
I have mentioned it before that I feel like the LS 500's tune of the V35A-FTS should have probably been "450" and if the LX/Land Cruiser's tune has so much torque, sure, maybe that one is "500". So LS 450 and LX 500. Upcoming GX could be 450 or 400... not sure anyone cares that much.
BMW "6" = "60i = 523hp, 553lb-ft
Lexus "6" = 600 = 409hp, 479lb-ft
Mercedes "580" = 483hp, 516lb-ft
Where I really start to scratch my head is whether or not an LX hybrid will ever exist. A while ago there was a rumor of a 483hp, 600+ lb-ft of torque "LX 750h" and I really hope Lexus doesn't try to go that route with nomenclature. If they were smart, they'd just leave it at LX 650h maybe.
Anyway, Lexus' over-inflated naming scheme makes no sense to me as anything other than a marketing ploy. I know turbos and electricity change the game of "naming after displacement" but... make it make sense.