Agreed. I think we’ll see A25 hybrid, T24, T24 hybrid. I think breakdown will be as follows:I'd the possibility of the A25A hybrid. We'll find out in 2 days hopefully
I'm noticing a couple of people online feverishly wanting the NA 2.5 hybrid powertrain in Toyota's and Lexus' bigger products. The fact that these guys are fine with the A25A-FKS being an option in the Tacoma now helps me to understand why Toyota's standards are so low.Agreed. I think we’ll see A25 hybrid, T24, T24 hybrid. I think breakdown will be as follows:
SR5: A25 hybrid and T24
Sport and TRD Offroad: A25 hybrid, T24, and T24 hybrid
Limited: T24 and T24 hybrid
Pro: T24 hybrid
The non-hybrid A25A-FKS is much worse than the hybrid A25A-FXS. It is LOUD and it is ROUGH, and the 8-speed FWD transmission is very slow to downshift when you want the torque.I'm noticing a couple of people online feverishly wanting the NA 2.5 hybrid powertrain in Toyota's and Lexus' bigger products. The fact that these guys are fine with the A25A-FKS being an option in the Tacoma now helps me to understand why Toyota's standards are so god damn low.
That powertrain would be hot garbage for a big, body-on-frame truck. I see Kirk Kreifels creaming himself over the A25A-FKS in the RX, Highlander and other larger Toyota/Lexus products (like the Grand Highlander) which is just disappointing. Sure, it is a genuine knockout in terms of MPGs, but in heavier products it's going to suffer performance-wise.
While refined, the A25A-FKS makes the most god-awful noise with Toyota's HSD and feels like it's desperate for more power. I'm starting to get more annoyed at the complacent buyer base online, and I'm wish that people start pushing Toyota and Lexus to build powerful, yet efficient powertrains that don't have to suck your soul the way the A25A-FKS power unit does.
Rant over.
Yeah, I definitely wouldn’t want a 2.5 hybrid, but there are a surprising amount of people who have been clamoring for one. I could see it being a popular choice for fleet vehicles too. After seeing Toyota make the 2.5 hybrid the sole powertrain in the Sienna, nothing surprises me anymore.
I’d love to see Toyota build a GR Tacoma with a V35 and long travel front end, but most here seem to shoot down that idea. So, there would appear to be quite a bit of complacency with the T24 hybrid drivetrain as well. Personally, I don’t want all that complexity in a 4Runner/Tacoma. My preference would be an updated 1GR with a manual, or maybe a T24 even though its performance is marginally better than the 1GR (which is disappointing given the 1GR has been out for 20+ years).
The A25A hybrid will be a replacement for the 2.7L I4, which will be better in probably every way. Pure all out towing maybe not but no one is towing with a base engine, hell with a midsized truck even. That hybrid in the Highlander has the same tow rating as the Tacoma I4, both at 3,500lbs. Plus it has way more torque. This is Toyota's best seller truck, so giving it different varieties like a traditional hybrid (lots of mpgs) will be fine.I'm noticing a couple of people online feverishly wanting the NA 2.5 hybrid powertrain in Toyota's and Lexus' bigger products. The fact that these guys are fine with the A25A-FKS being an option in the Tacoma now helps me to understand why Toyota's standards are so god damn low.
You can't see the new 500h as a "current" 500h replacement, but rather a 350 (V6 N/A) replacement.
This new 500h powertrain is for those who a couple of years ago didn't want a hybrid, for those who prefer a more conventional way of driving feel, for those who have a RX350 (V6) and wanted something more powerful.
And in that way, TMC managed to do a homerun, using the majority of components from the new 350 (2.4T) powertrain, just think about the modularity.
I had the same thought. If it was the full reveal they would provide a time and livestream link or something.Not sure, but knowing Toyota, I expect a teaser first.
Modularity and scalability means nothing if they don't take advantage of that and actually scale it up, like Volvo does with the Recharge line and Polestar 1. They managed to get a 600PS/1000N.m super sedan with a transverse eAWD platform that can also go 80mi in EV mode.And in that way, TMC managed to do a homerun, using the majority of components from the new 350 (2.4T) powertrain, just think about the modularity.
What you're implying is that Lexus will release a higher powertrain than the 500h for the RX, but they won't.
Lexus put themselves in a very undesirable position by only relegating themselves to four-cylinder power plants. Someone close to Toyota and Lexus needs to tell them that there is huge demand for a six-cylinder option and it would be worth to develop one for all of their vehicles across both the Toyota and Lexus lineup.
A switch in drivetrain configuration would be necessary to carry out these changes, but it would be truly worth it. Knowing Lexus, they'll just stagnate until they release their EVs en masse, as there is a greater likelihood a coconut falling from a tree and hitting my head than Lexus to actually make this move.
500h certainly isn't a 350 replacement since no RX350 buyer would buy a RX at that price. Their focus group is current F car owners who need more practicality or X5/GLE buyers who switched to Lexus.
Modularity and scalability means nothing if they don't take advantage of that and actually scale it up, like Volvo does with the Recharge line and Polestar 1. They managed to get a 600PS/1000N.m super sedan with a transverse eAWD platform that can also go 80mi in EV mode.
You will have to wait roughly 30 years for Toyota to make something similar. There's no use to future proof a platform if they don't actually plan to do anything in the future.
The 500h system in its current form could scale up to 330kW(450PS) and 710N.m(523lb.ft) of combined output. But good luck seeing any TMC product with that kind of output with this system.