I think it's funny that dealers just recently are putting up a fuss about an Escalade competitor. I think the exact reason Lexus lost its cache was because of the rise of the Escalade in the early 2000s. Prior to that it was pretty common to see e.g. NFL superstar Randy Moss driving his LS, but almost overnight it was all Escalades. And after that fad blew over (it's still going to an extent, but not like it was then) the celebs all went European. But overall, that was GM's best badge-engineering idea ever, even if the execution on stock models was always suspect.
Very excellent perspective. I think with LS 430, it became a very conservative car and lost its street cred outside of actual enthusiasts (who weren't only about flash).
Even with the Navigator around, LS 400 and LX 450/470 had staying power in late 90s. The minute the MBUSA-official G 500 and 2nd gen Escalade appeared in 2001, it all slowly went to hell. GX was too conservative, although modern inside out to make a dent.
2002 Range Rover even benchmarked the LX 470, because it was so good for its time. Ironically Lexus benchmarked them too for interior luxury with the '95 Range. That right there, did it.
In 1999, LX & Range Rover reigned at the top of luxury utes, followed by Navigator and archaic, yet blingy Escalade.
They really should have beat the Audi Q7 to market with HPX crossover in late 2005. They were just so overwhelmed with new GS, IS, ES, LS in 2005-06.
I can forgive Lexus for not developing an Escalade ESV competitor, as do they really need it? They need a large crossover before tackling a risky market, that could backfire with a downturn.
The dealers are the reason the Sequoia got a new lease on life per
@Gecko. Akio Toyoda wanted to kill it 6 years ago. Now the Lexus side wants a big, extended length 8 seater. They need to give it up, as a slightly bigger full size is fine, but a jumbo Lexus is not needed and waste of resources.