Sebass
Follower
- Messages
- 135
- Reactions
- 260
π€π€¨πππΆππNo I'm thinking Lexus does look in here, a few moments after this post from @Carmaker1 goes up, this shows up on Facebook:
View attachment 3848
π€π€¨πππΆππNo I'm thinking Lexus does look in here, a few moments after this post from @Carmaker1 goes up, this shows up on Facebook:
View attachment 3848
No argument there. I think they wanted to go their own way with infotainment, with the Scout app instead of Carplay and Android Auto early on. No automaker these days is trying to do their own proprietary version anymore because they are not tech companies.
Because it's easily possible from the ECU to blow up the engine in various horrible ways. And on the infotainment end, that stuff's still on the CAN bus so it can do things like cause unintended acceleration or shift into reverse at 65 MPH. The well-publicized FCA/Jeep hacks a few years ago all got into the car through the infotainment, and they were able to remotely steer, accelerate, and brake.
I figure explaining unix was a bit too semantic. Most barely understand what linux is.
I am glad to see that it was reiterated that the LQ is not going to be a Lexus. At least not until a formal full-length trademark is filed in the form of LQ 600 or similar. You remember what happened with "TX" back in 2013, with a bunch of extrapolations on something that had no formal trademark denoting engine capacity.
One thing that disappoints me about the past, is how the heck did this never go into production?
When you look at the landscape of the automotive marketplace all together in 2003, no one of high caliber (sorry GM) had anything like this in production.
In development though? Hell yes (see below). What the hell were Lexus product planners thinking in 2001-05?, to reject making the HP-X/LF-X into a production vehicle?
Either development should have been underway from about 2001ish, with HPX as teaser of finished car in 2003 and production vehicle in 2004-05. Or pure design study in 2003 again as HPX, then production vehicle in 2006-07.
20 decades SHOULDN'T have elapsed between HPX/LF-X and production LF-1. Like with the LF-LC concept. LF-1 is taking the whole nine yards and wasn't in planning long enough to be ready to go.
That is not a customer's issue but a designers/engineers issue.
I am glad to see that it was reiterated that the LQ is not going to be a Lexus. At least not until a formal full-length trademark is filed in the form of LQ 600 or similar. You remember what happened with "TX" back in 2013, with a bunch of extrapolations on something that had no formal trademark denoting engine capacity. That being said, Instagram's "Allcarnews" is NOT a good source and are the entity that created a rumor about a non-existent Mirai-based Lexus.
@Gecko and co. usage of "LF-1" is probably for the best for the time being.
One thing that disappoints me about the past, is how the heck did this never go into production?
When you look at the landscape of the automotive marketplace all together in 2003, no one of high caliber (sorry GM) had anything like this in production.
In development though? Hell yes (see below). What the hell were Lexus product planners thinking in 2001-05?, to reject making the HP-X/LF-X into a production vehicle?
Either development should have been underway from about 2001ish, with HPX as teaser of finished car in 2003 and production vehicle in 2004-05. Or pure design study in 2003 again as HPX, then production vehicle in 2006-07.
Underpinning this concept was the N Platform, a new unibody RWD architecture in 2003, later debuting on the S180 Crown. In fact, the percieved regression over the XF40 LS of 2006 against XF30 LS 430, I wonder if can be connected from switching a bespoke LS platform to a stretched version of executive class N Platform shared with RWD JDM Toyotas and 3GS (S190) ?
For the first time, the next S-Class (W223-2020) will essentially ride on the same MRA II architecture as the future E-Class (W214-2023) and C-Class (W206-2021). Outgoing W222 flagship was a heavy redesign of W221 S-Class introduced in 2005 ironically, married to ultra-luxury elements heavily borrowed from Maybach and British luxury.
Anyway, back to LF-X (HPX)
So the luxury crossover segment brewing in April 2003:
What was Lexus doing by dropping the ball and not putting this vehicle into production?
- Cadillac had revealed the production version of the ugly, yet revolutionary unibody RWD SRX 7-seater crossover due in Sept. '03 All in spite of their already successful BOF GMT800 basis 2nd generation Escalade. Styling was finalized by GM management in 2000 and initiated in 1998.View attachment 3840View attachment 3843View attachment 3841
- Audi/VAG the longitudinal FWD-basis (std. Quattro AWD), yet unibody 7 seater Q7 for early 2006 launch off of new Pikes Peaks Concept (did actually influence Q7). Production styling was frozen in late 2003, entering production in November 2005.View attachment 3844View attachment 3838View attachment 3835
- DaimlerChrysler had already signed off on X164 program initiated in 2000, for bigger "ML LWB" as G-Class replacement in 2006. A full sized, uniframe, RWD crossover. Final styling was frozen in 2002 ahead of Lexus concept showing in 2003. This later arrived in 2006 as the GL (now GLS). View attachment 3834View attachment 3839
- I don't consider the E70 BMW X5 later introduced in 2006 to be a genuine, large 7-seater.View attachment 3845View attachment 3846
First shown as the HPX (by designer Bill Chergosky in 2002) at the New York International Auto Show in April 2003 as the first public introduction of L-finesse design language created in 2001 and then shown in Tokyo in October 2003 as the renamed LF-X.
This thing was fire and more beautiful than the current LF-1 on the exterior. The parent of LF-1 essentially. Is it because the SUV/crossover landscape in the early 2000s was still in infancy, feeling LX and GX were good enough on family sized side of things and RX was too precious to threaten its success with another crossover?
Even the 5-seater Porsche Cayenne (L-FWD/AWD) had just been released and much smaller Infiniti FX45 launched January 24, 2003.
20 decades SHOULDN'T have elapsed between HPX/LF-X and production LF-1. Like with the LF-LC concept. LF-1 is taking the whole nine yards and wasn't in planning long enough to be ready to go.
I can vouch for that, given that my son-in-law (an electrical engineer) transitioned from working for BlackBerry to working for Ford.I also think Ford used QNX, that I related to Blackberry.
Suddenly I am very uncomfortable.π¬No I'm thinking Lexus does look in here, a few moments after this post from @Carmaker1 goes up, this shows up on Facebook:
View attachment 3848
This probably explains the reduction in spy shots...
Would LT (Luxury Touring) work as the official name for LF-1? That makes sense as they also have the CT. Only problem is it conflicts with a Lexus Tundra (Luxury Truck) if they decide to build one, but that could be called LU (Luxury Utility).
I've not owned a vehicle with Car Play yet, only have used CP on my friend's C-HR and a rented 2019 RAV4; but I've rented plenty of other brands with Carplay. When I rented a car with CP, having the maps on the screen was important since I travel to new places for work since I have to visit clients, and Google Calendar links to Google Maps. Not having Carplay/Android Auto is a deal breaker to me. I briefly had an Android phone for work and did try it on the rental as well, and also found it to be useful for the same reasons.Have you owned a Lexus or Toyota with Car Play? I can tell you, there are pros and there are cons of Apple Car play.
Is there a reason we can't just call it the LF-1? I actually like that name a lot. I know it doesn't "fit" into what we call everything else but I like the name at least.
Sorry, LT reminds me too much of this... the failed Lincoln Mark LT luxury (pickup) truck.
Failed, or ahead of its time?
Unfortunately, unless Lexus takes their marketing 101 course, they will always be behind the Germans.
When the LF1 comes with its 650 PS TT V8, BMW will be there with their X8 M with its 750 PS TT V8 Hybrid.
New BMW XM hits the road: fresh pictures of extreme SUV
CAR magazine UK reveals exclusive details on the most powerful M car, the 2022 BMW X8 M with pictures and specswww.carmagazine.co.uk