Oh I see it now, it's 3.3 turbo and not 3.0 supercharged mild hybridNo it's a turbo engine, detuned maybe for good emissions. If it comes to NA it would definitely have more power.
Oh I see it now, it's 3.3 turbo and not 3.0 supercharged mild hybridNo it's a turbo engine, detuned maybe for good emissions. If it comes to NA it would definitely have more power.
Really happy for Mazda.
However, it goes without saying......
B58 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
This is the base engine? Interesting positioning.
Give it a chance! B58 is an amazing engine but this might be as well in higher tunes. I do want to feel Stellantis' hi-po i6 as well in a car.
Really happy for Mazda.
However, it goes without saying......
B58 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
I'm insinuating higher-performance version of the engine, obviously not expecting the tuned for a crossover version to go directly into an A100 without any modification. The X5 40i makes 335hp out of the B58, X7 got uprated to the 375hp version. Who knows what this engine's potential is!And yet people still kept insinuating that this is good enough for the A100 GR Supra or a Lexus product. No.
Give it a chance! B58 is an amazing engine but this might be as well in higher tunes. I do want to feel Stellantis' hi-po i6 as well in a car.
I'm insinuating higher-performance version of the engine, obviously not expecting the tuned for a crossover version to go directly into an A100 without any modification. The X5 40i makes 335hp out of the B58, X7 got uprated to the 375hp version. Who knows what this engine's potential is!
I find it hard to believe this HO especially will be good in the long run, 26psi 500hp in a 6000lb vehicle. In a charger would be nice.I find Stellantis' engine to be way more impressive IMHO. Looks to be a solid engine so far.
A "bad" Lexus IS/Mazda 6 twin with 340 PS I6 to compete against the BMW 340i would better than no Mazda 6 or the Lexus IS that is on sale now. I'd rather have "not good enough" than "not at all".But this turbo engine makes exactly the same power as the 2020 GR Supra's B58 but with a 0.3L greater displacement. If the Mazda engine had the same HP/L ratio as the 2020 GR Supra's B58 (113.3333 HP/L) then it should be making 374 horsepower, and even then it won't be enough because the B58 is underrated by a solid 10%.
If we're referring to the quoted 2021+ GR Supra B58 (127.3333 HP/L) power numbers then the Mazda inline-six should be making 420 horsepower. The irony again being, if you were to dyno the 2021+ cars, the GR Supra is making something to the tune of 430-440 horsepower.
Mazda going full-steam with utilizing the Atkinson cycle is going to starve these engines from the power that they need to be competitive in the premium market. All of this in exchange for a few more MPGs.
And yet people still kept insinuating that this is good enough for the A100 GR Supra or a Lexus product. No.
A "bad" Lexus IS/Mazda 6 twin with 340 PS I6 to compete against the BMW 340i would better than no Mazda 6 or the Lexus IS that is on sale now. I'd rather have "not good enough" than "not at all".
The B58/S58 however perfect, I could not care less in a CUV.
Yup that was way back in 2018. The IS/RC was also rumored to go on that platform also. Then BMW's. Then their own (GAL). Now still on the same as 10 years agoThere is enough info on the web today that Mazda 6 was indeed the first RWD model they developed and then just decided not to do it.
I know this is really old (over 2 years ago) but Nissan had the Skyline crossover. Mitsubishi and Suzuki also had RWD unibody SUVs in the Pajero and Grand Vitara. Century SUV aside, the Land Cruiser SE might be their first premium RWD CUV. Maybe some e-TNGA crossover beats it first but I doubt it.Mazda has beaten Toyota, Honda, Lexus, Acura and Nissan to a RWD premium crossover.