mikeavelli
Moderator
- Messages
- 7,065
- Reactions
- 15,693
HahahaYou really have a vendetta against the Type-S LOL.
Ironically even James took a jab at the Type-S and how Acura over-exaggerated the marketing.
Well...... the C8 Corvette and GR Supra disagree with you in this regard.Hahaha
They gonna do the same crap with the Integra. Drag it out and fanboys gonna overhype another dud.
You aren't wrong here though.Note Lambo drops the Countach out the blue and Lexus did the same for the 500.
If you gonna hype it up this day and age better live up to it.
1:15.90 is a pretty decent time for what the GR86 is though, only 0.72 seconds slower than a Mustang GT PP1 and the other cars that are around a second quicker than the GR86 are also A LOT more powerful than the GR86.
Agreed. I don't care about the Type S anymore, but that's impressive company for the GR86.1:15.90 is a pretty decent time for what the GR86 is though, only 0.72 seconds slower than a Mustang GT PP1 and the other cars that are around a second quicker than the GR86 are also A LOT more powerful than the GR86.
Of course, Tyson had to get oneAll trolling and joking aside, I'm going to be very interested to see how the TLX Type S sells after the fanboys buy theirs out of nostalgia and loyalty. I can understand a Honda/Acura fanboy being excited about getting one, but I'm having a hard time seeing the appeal for a broader audience.
It doesn't make much sense to buy the TLX Type S, even if we ignore the performance and driving experience and focus on daily usability, it's still worse than almost all it's competitors when you take into account its exterior dimensions, it's so weird to see a Honda product have such bad packaging efficiency, you would think that a transversely mounted front engine, FWD-based layout would benefit interior space, giving it ES like amount of space, but they somehow screw it up so badly that they end up with IS like interior space, while being way bigger and heavier on the outside, actually that kinda reminds me of the American land yacht sedans of the past, big on the outside, small on the inside. Did I mention the Type S doesn't have foldable rear seats?All trolling and joking aside, I'm going to be very interested to see how the TLX Type S sells after the fanboys buy theirs out of nostalgia and loyalty. I can understand a Honda/Acura fanboy being excited about getting one, but I'm having a hard time seeing the appeal for a broader audience. Literally every other car is better, lighter, faster, more efficient, etc.
If it was a refresh it’s somewhat forgivable. If they didn’t overhype it for a year it’s somewhat forgivable. With the rlx dead this is sadly their flagship sedan, it’s all new, they claim a new platform and it’s dead last not just in performance and mpg but the heaviest. Then like you said it’s huge outside and tiny inside. It doesn’t offer all the advance package features either. Honda’s have digital gauges and the accord offers some features this doesn’t have. This is again their flagship now.It doesn't make much sense to buy the TLX Type S, even if we ignore the performance and driving experience and focus on daily usability, it's still worse than almost all it's competitors when you take into account its exterior dimensions, it's so weird to see a Honda product have such bad packaging efficiency, you would think that a transversely mounted front engine, FWD-based layout would benefit interior space, giving it ES like amount of space, but they somehow screw it up so badly that they end up with IS like interior space, while being way bigger and heavier on the outside, actually that kinda reminds me of the American land yacht sedans of the past, big on the outside, small on the inside. Did I mention the Type S doesn't have foldable rear seats?
Is this fanboying done right?And to top it off, they invite fanboys to a press event at the track where they try to insinuate its faster and a better performer. When it got in the hands of everyone else, the truth came out. It’s a slug.
They don't have to worry. Even if Lexus come up next year with an ES500h E-Axle (a car that can actually drive in RWD) the media would still trash it as 'soul-less' and give the win to TLX Type-S.
almost as predictable as you posting thatPredictably last place
Acura TLX Type S vs. Cadillac CT5-V, Genesis G70 3.3T Comparison Test: Looking Beyond Europe
The TLX Type S, CT5-V, and G70 3.3T all make a compelling case for sport sedans—but which one should you take home?www.motortrend.com
almost as predictable as you posting that