I've tried for many years to stop this misinformation that 2GR-FKS is a 15-year-old engine and I'm considering giving up. IT IS NOT. It shares cylinder dimensions with the 2GR-FSE from 2005 and that's about it. 80% of the parts are completely new. It's like saying the C8 Corvette has a 15-year-old engine because the LT2 and LS3 share the same dimensions.
The 2GR-FKS is a very modern engine with very solid engineering specifications. You can't easily find another NA V6 with this level of specific output, thermal efficiency, and reliability at the same time. The amount of technologies incorporated is ahead of its time in 2015 and about average by 2018. It definitely is not obsolete.
The engine itself did nothing wrong for the IS. Not planning a model above the 350 to adapt to new market needs is the real problem. How many times do I need to repeat that?
I just hate it when most car journalist understand very little about engineering and then pretend to know a lot about cars. If you were a wine taster you are expected to understand the chemistry behind fermentation and esterification.
The 2GR-FKS is a very modern engine with very solid engineering specifications. You can't easily find another NA V6 with this level of specific output, thermal efficiency, and reliability at the same time. The amount of technologies incorporated is ahead of its time in 2015 and about average by 2018. It definitely is not obsolete.
The engine itself did nothing wrong for the IS. Not planning a model above the 350 to adapt to new market needs is the real problem. How many times do I need to repeat that?
I just hate it when most car journalist understand very little about engineering and then pretend to know a lot about cars. If you were a wine taster you are expected to understand the chemistry behind fermentation and esterification.