mikeavelli
Moderator
- Messages
- 7,028
- Reactions
- 15,603
But wait, there’s more! Ultra White.. red interior but it was closed...I am biased to white cars lol
But wait, there’s more! Ultra White.. red interior but it was closed...I am biased to white cars lol
This would be amazing but I can see a IS 500 with 416hp TTV6 and the IS-F having the same 472hp as the RC-F 5.0LV8. Wishful thinking though lolI know this sounds like heresy but I'd rather have an IS500 with a twin turbo V6 if it means the following:
I basically just described the Genesis G70 / C43 / etc. but in Lexus form.
- 370+HP and corresponding torque at low rpm
- 0 - 60mph in ~4.5s consistently
- RWD and AWD
- 10 speed auto
- Folding rear seats
- No compromise to every day practicality
But wait, there’s more! Ultra White.. red interior
is there any proof that it was done intentionally?I can't believe how good that looks, they absolutely nailed the athletic shape of the car. I truly hope there is a V35a variant, especially since I think the V35a is set at exactly 416hp to pay homage to the original IS-F
is there any proof that it was done intentionally?
It definitely SHOULD!!! but who knows if they will put it in? Logistically would the awd system even fit with the 10 speed? I can get over the interior if they update the drive trainit should have awd, c43 has awd, same with m340i
What about all the great sports sedans that have ever existed? A lot of them were RWD. Sure they may not have been able to put all the power down onto the pavement, but that's not really the main purpose of this type of car.An IS with V35 should ONLY come with AWD. No front-engine RWD vehicle with that amount of power-to-weight ratio could be optimally drivable. If not the manufacturer is just saving cost.
An IS with V35 should ONLY come with AWD. No front-engine RWD vehicle with that amount of power-to-weight ratio could be optimally drivable. If not the manufacturer is just saving cost.
For some of us, it was not that long ago that AWD was not a widely-available option (a decade or so) and sports sedans, even super-powerful AMG and M models only came in RWD form.What about all the great sports sedans that have ever existed? A lot of them were RWD. Sure they may not have been able to put all the power down onto the pavement, but that's not really the main purpose of this type of car.
are RWD generally faster compared to AWD? it would seem that AWD can put down the power better, but have more drive train losses, while RWD may struggle with grip.
It's a pure coincidence. The V35A-FTS is rated at exactly 90kW/L making it 310kW/416hp from a 3.444L displacement. And it's exactly 90kW/L because the max torque is fixed at 599N.m/442lb.ft through electronic boost control.is there any proof that it was done intentionally?
AWD advantage is only in the first 60 foot. After that, it is at a disadvantage. Higher drivetrain loss and more weight. Also, weight distribution also favors RWD better.