mikeavelli
Moderator
- Messages
- 7,045
- Reactions
- 15,636
In the USA if you pick up a major Publication (Motor Trend etc) there is a centerfold ad
View the original article postCompared favorably to the BMW M4.
Nice to see finally a Lexus Top Gear is willing to recognize as better than M4. However, their "untruths" about the 1st gen RCF are perplexing. Yes, there is minimal understeer in the RCF like most sports cars have and TVD was developed to get a neutral behavior, but saying it was "limo" understeer is ridiculous. I can get the car into an oversteer with the throttle very easily without being highly skilled. My hope is, the new RCF-spec MPS4S with the stiff sidewalls will go a long way in minimizing understeer.
I fully agree with you here. BTW: the Porsche 911 is known for significant understeer (engine in back); i bet it has a tendency to understeer more than the RC F. I don't know, but owning a 911 and driving it on the track the understeer is something that one must learn to manage in high speed corners. I just think that Top Gear wanted to be a little prosy and write a nice little piece with extra words to make it sound better. Perhaps they mean that if and when you do experience understeer, the experience is a little more comfortable than in something like a 911. the RC F is such a comfortable car. In a number of ways, nicer to drive than the 911.
I have to keep reminding myself that Top Gear and MotorTrend and C & D etc, are autojournalists and writing/prose and entertainment is a critical part of what they do; being entirely fair and accurate is NOT the top priority. [although, when they lavish praise, we love it!]
The Japanese-language version of the Lexus Global Newsroom has just posted a news release (including pricing) on JDM versions of the refreshed RC F, including the "Performance Package" (their take on the export Track Edition). Click through to view the original and Google Translated versions of said news release.