10th Generation Honda Accord Thread (Officially Revealed)

Gecko

Administrator
Messages
4,753
Reactions
11,385
First word is out and the V6 is dropped in favor of a 2.0L turbo 4.

Fewer cylinders, more turbo | 2018 Honda Accord Powertrain Prototype First Drive

next-gen-accord-1.jpg


A highly camouflaged 2018 Honda Accord prototype is circling Honda's high-speed oval at its Tochigi test center, a short Shinkansen ride from Tokyo, and doing its best to replicate the bullet train's impact on spectators. There's no warning. No "I think I hear it approaching." No exhaust trumpet sneaking ahead announcing its pending arrival. Nothing. There is only the lightly rustling of leaves, a particularly annoying crow and then 1.2 seconds of fury as a 10th-generation Honda Accord prototype breaks all of the wind somewhere near 130 mph. There's a sharp gasp and the young woman to my left is wide-eyed and staring at blank space where a car used to be.

This is not the traditional way a carmaker reveals that it's eliminating a beloved naturally-aspirated 3.5-liter V6 and replacing it with a potentially lower-horsepower 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder. But every once in awhile a show of force is required to show the world you can still throw down.

"No. Never in the last five years." Junji Yamano, chief engineer and leader of Accord development, confidently tells us when asked if a V6 was ever really on the table for his new midsize sedan. Through a translator, the engineer gives the same pitch every other carmaker gives when making this switch: flatter torque curve, earlier low-end power, increased fuel economy ... when not on boost.

This isn't a shock as the turbos-not-cylinders engine strategy was a significant shift for Honda that was designed to work with most, if not all, of its vehicles. If you've been paying attention recently and putting the pieces together, you'll have a correctly guessed that this is a derivative of the Ohio-built barnstormer that powers the wicked new Civic Type-R. While that engine produces 306 horses, the one in the new Accord will produce fewer, Honda confirmed. The reasons for this are pretty simple as midsize sedan buyers have different expectations of power delivery, fuel economy, and NVH; and midsize sedans have more mass to move around.

Specific changes include a low-inertia turbocharger, a secondary balancer, and tuning for regular fuel compared to the Type-R which likes the premium juice. If we had to guess on what the final spec sheet will say, we'd bet this is pushing 260 horsepower at 6,500 rpm, 255 pound-feet of torque right around 1,750 rpm, and a highway fuel economy number of 35 mpg. As the replacement for the V6, this 2.0 is certainly not the only powerplant we'll see in the upcoming Accord. Honda confirmed a hybrid variant and announced the base motor would be the company's ubiquitous 1.5-liter turbo four cylinder that does duty in the CR-V and Civic.

Backing up this motor is another semi-shared part, the 10-speed automatic we've just sampled in the all-new Odyssey. Honda wasn't ready to confirm what, if any, changes were made to the transmission itself for this application beyond a unique torque converter.

The other big news on the powertrain front is the availability of a six-speed manual with either of the two conventional engines. "Based on Civic and Type-R, we know that the characteristics of these engines are very good with a manual transmission," a Honda rep tells us; Having just stepped out of a Type-R, we couldn't argue. And because we're not accountants or profit-focused product planners, we're not going to argue with their decision to include a manual transmission at all. As expected, the Accord remains front-drive regardless of engine and transmission.

We've been warned that the prototype vehicle we're about to drive is an early build. The engine and transmission are nearing the final stages of completion, but the interior, exterior, and suspension seen here should not be taken as anything like production-ready. Considering that, we'll only talk for a moment about these things and focus on the motor in a minute.

From the outside, this Accord prototype looks longer, wider, and lower than the current car. Through the camouflage tape, the LED headlight assemblies look thin and angry. The hood looks lower than those found on almost any other production car in the post pedestrian-crash era. Finally, while it could be the camo, there's an elegance to the profile here that we think is owed to that low hood and what looks like a pushed-back dash.

Inside was a sea of, yup, you guessed it; camo. The only thing we can definitively say is that there is a ton of room on the inside. You've got excesses of height and width to work with in there that some other midsize sedans have lost as dashes, chunky door panels, and center consoles started sliding into our space.

Finally out on the track, the Accord performs almost exactly as we'd expected it to. Though we were told not to focus on it, we can't help but find the steering to be exceptional for the class. It's light on center yet requires no thought to stay in the lane and has no slop. Honda engineers admitted that behavior was one of their primary goals. The engine itself is less exemplary; it just feels, pulls, sounds and acts like every other modern turbocharged four-banger paired to a many-geared transmission.

From a dead stop with lots of pedal pressure (50-100 percent), the Accord absolutely moves. It puts you back in your seat an inch while staying sewing-machine smooth and making a great noise that's half intake and half exhaust. And when the transmission only has to upshift, the gearchanges are crisp and fast, keeping the power right where it needs to be. Acceleration doesn't really drop off until about 100 mph and then it's more of a slight drop as we hit 120 and then 125 before really thinking about it. The engine's as smooth and quiet at triple-digits as it is at 65 as it is at idle. It's pure Honda engineering talent on display. But you learn little from circling an oval in a family sedan, so we backed off and replicated some highway cruising and passing maneuvers from various real-world speeds.

These are the situations where the Accord's 2.0, just like all of the other motors of its ilk, kind of fall short. Tuned for fuel economy, as soon as you start a steady-state cruise, the transmissions leap to the highest gear possible and the engines try to use that turbo as little as possible. Prod it for a little extra momentum and you're met with a bit of a lag as the 10-speed starts dropping to find the right gear followed by a little bit more of a wait while the turbo spools up.

While these situations can seem a little annoying, there are two very real rubs to this behavior: The first is that as soon as you want to use the power, those low-load EPA fuel economy numbers get burned up and dumped right over the turbine. Second is that, after experiencing this a few times, confidence in the powertrain declines. If you need to accelerate to catch a gap in traffic or get out of a jam where it may be too late to brake, the last thing you want is noticeable, two-step delay.

The 2018 Honda Accord won't go on sale until later this year which means that Honda will have tweaked the formula to the best of its ability. Given Honda's near 70-year history of engineering excellence, if it can't crack this nut, nobody can.

Source: http://www.autoblog.com/2017/06/09/...n-prototype-first-drive-review/#slide-5066854
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,157
Reactions
2,675
The car's going to be introduced, as a 2018, in only a couple of months, and they still have it wrapped up like a mummy?

Give me a break. :rolleyes:
 

CIF

Premium Member
Messages
1,675
Reactions
1,825
Well I can't say I'm surprised, at all. Very expected from Honda.

Various auto outlets and journalists have gushed about the 4 cylinder turbo engines on the Civic, and the numbers sure look good on paper. Except I think very few of them tested those turbo Civics in any real world conditions. I'm certain that lag and hesitation will be very present in real world driving conditions.
 
Last edited:

Joaquin Ruhi

Moderator
Messages
1,529
Reactions
2,434
Various auto outlets and journalists have gushed about the 4 cylinder turbo engines on the Civic, and the numbers sure look good on paper. Except I think very few of them tested those turbo Civics in any real world conditions. I'm certain that lag and hesitation will be very present in real world driving conditions.
Not really. I know I'm getting ahead of myself, but I was able to sample a manual Civic Sport Hatchback (review to come) for a week in real world driving conditions and felt near-zero lag and no hesitation. I was quite impressed.
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,157
Reactions
2,675
Not really. I know I'm getting ahead of myself, but I was able to sample a manual Civic Sport Hatchback (review to come) for a week in real world driving conditions and felt near-zero lag and no hesitation. I was quite impressed.


I'm not an engineer, and don't know all the details, but a lack of turbo lag could (?) indicate that they program the turbo to be spinning at a lower RPM all the time, even when it is not in use (to reduce spool-up time). That could add to the wear and maybe shorten the turbo's lifetime, though great advances in turbo durability, cooling-jackets, and synthetic oil have been made lately that could counteract this.
 
Last edited:

mikeavelli

Moderator
Messages
6,805
Reactions
15,213
A number of other manufacturers have also done so for mid-sized family-sedans.....courtesy of CAFE. There's still a couple of exceptions, though....like the Fusion Sport.

Not courtesy of CAFE. Courtesy of thats their business decision. Toyota still has the V-6 coming.

If anyone would be least affected by CAFE it would Honda. They sell no real trucks, no V-8 anything, nothing really inefficient.
 
Messages
2,828
Reactions
3,424
At this point, it might not matter. If the engine in the top Accord is from the Type R, it already has instant cred...every YT reviewer is gushing over this
q8t2ampqdcbuhwrlvsun.jpg
 

mikeavelli

Moderator
Messages
6,805
Reactions
15,213
^^ I doubt they leave it untouched, it will be re-tuned for a family car. Its not exactly the old Honda, RPM is only 7000 max.... Still a very good engine of course.
 

Joaquin Ruhi

Moderator
Messages
1,529
Reactions
2,434
^^ I doubt they leave it untouched, it will be re-tuned for a family car. Its not exactly the old Honda, RPM is only 7000 max.... Still a very good engine of course.
Definitely! As it is, the Honda 1.5 turbo comes in at least 3 different states of tune, depending on the model. I'd expect the same from the 2.0 turbo.
 

Ian Schmidt

Moderator
Messages
2,339
Reactions
4,071
That looks surprisingly Lexus-esque but I'll reserve final judgement for real pictures without the fake motion blur.
 

mikeavelli

Moderator
Messages
6,805
Reactions
15,213
I no longer get hyped by exaggerated drawings. The overall direction looks nice.
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,157
Reactions
2,675
Nice shots of the new engine...but if it were up to me, I'd say keep the V6 as an option. I'm generally not a fan of turbo-4's, for several reasons.....though I do admit that the 2.0L turbo 4's from several different manufacturers are quite responsive.....even in some heavier vehicles.
 

Gecko

Administrator
Messages
4,753
Reactions
11,385
My take: I simply don't understand why Honda cant design a decent looking car (this, Odyssey, CR-V, Ridgeline... all hideous)? The interior looks very nice and top notch, but the outside looks like a Hyundai Genesis bred with a pug. This picture specifically makes me cringe:

18-2018-honda-accord-hybrid-1.jpg


Honda always does a great job with engineering so I won't take that away from them, but for me personally, it's the Camry hands down.
 

bogglo

Admirer
Messages
591
Reactions
776
Damn Honda what happened??? They should have just kept the old design. To be honest am not too surprised because, every time Toyota make their car ugly Honda designs are always good looking and vice versa. honestly the civic looks way better IMO.