mmcartalk
Expert
- Messages
- 4,157
- Reactions
- 2,675
I see this thread is going to get a lot of posts........probably because we can all let off steam here about our automotive dislikes.
Here's two more of my peeves.............First, center-stack gauges. The manufacturers that did this on some of their models (Scion, Toyota, Saturn, Nissan, and Panoz) claimed that it was a safety and visibility issue........getting the gauges out from behind the steering wheel where the wheel couldn't block their view. But what I see is a cheap cost-cutting attempt to use more or less the same dashboard parts for left-hand/right-hand drive versions for different markets.
Second, red and blue idiot-lights for engine-coolant temperature instead of a proper gauge. The blue lights usually go off when the anti-freeze reaches around 140 degrees (minimal warm-up), and the red (hot) lights from 220-250 degrees, wherever they are programmed.
I like a conventional temperature-gauge because both myself and my brother have owned cars with gauges that, because of the rising/falling needles, gave early-warning of failed cooling-system parts (thermostat, electric cooling-fan, etc...)...... BEFORE the engine actually got hot enough to trigger the red warning light. The needle, in my brother's old car, also showed some erratic up/down movement above the normal range from a defective thermostat...but, again, not quite enough to quite overheat things. Idiot lights cannot provide this cushion of early warning....they don't let you know that something is wrong until the engine is actually overheated and possibly damaged. Conversely, they also don't let you know if a defective thermostat is opening up a tad too early (but still above 140 degrees), and preventing a full warm-up.
Again, the auto companies try to justify this as more informative than gauges...and that a driver is more likely to see a sudden-flashing red or blue light than a slowly-wavering needle, but, again, I'm not convinced. Again, I see cost-cutting......a couple of tiny bulbs are cheaper than a needle-gauge.
Here's two more of my peeves.............First, center-stack gauges. The manufacturers that did this on some of their models (Scion, Toyota, Saturn, Nissan, and Panoz) claimed that it was a safety and visibility issue........getting the gauges out from behind the steering wheel where the wheel couldn't block their view. But what I see is a cheap cost-cutting attempt to use more or less the same dashboard parts for left-hand/right-hand drive versions for different markets.
Second, red and blue idiot-lights for engine-coolant temperature instead of a proper gauge. The blue lights usually go off when the anti-freeze reaches around 140 degrees (minimal warm-up), and the red (hot) lights from 220-250 degrees, wherever they are programmed.
I like a conventional temperature-gauge because both myself and my brother have owned cars with gauges that, because of the rising/falling needles, gave early-warning of failed cooling-system parts (thermostat, electric cooling-fan, etc...)...... BEFORE the engine actually got hot enough to trigger the red warning light. The needle, in my brother's old car, also showed some erratic up/down movement above the normal range from a defective thermostat...but, again, not quite enough to quite overheat things. Idiot lights cannot provide this cushion of early warning....they don't let you know that something is wrong until the engine is actually overheated and possibly damaged. Conversely, they also don't let you know if a defective thermostat is opening up a tad too early (but still above 140 degrees), and preventing a full warm-up.
Again, the auto companies try to justify this as more informative than gauges...and that a driver is more likely to see a sudden-flashing red or blue light than a slowly-wavering needle, but, again, I'm not convinced. Again, I see cost-cutting......a couple of tiny bulbs are cheaper than a needle-gauge.
Last edited: