Gotta say from that title it is a little harsh because I feel he overlooked the upgrades they've done to it. But to be $30k more than the standard RC F is a little bit of a stretch not going to lie.
Bro, you don't want to read the comments there, Reddit is even worse. I'll just say for $90K, I'd rather an LC for that amount of cash.Also, noticed he is clueless it has carbon ceramic brakes from the LFA (which are $15,000). So disappointing.
Bro, you don't want to read the comments there, Reddit is even worse. I'll just say for $90K, I'd rather an LC for that amount of cash.
If Lexus decided on selling more units than the 50 planned, perhaps the MSRP wouldn't be as high. I'm sure they have their reasons.Everyone has different preferences so I can totally see why someone would pick an LC500 with its Aston Martin level luxury. My issue is how they completely factually ignore/undermine traits of the RCF has over something like the LC500. It is much lighter, smaller, sportier and also outright quicker while still having probably 90% of the luxury and styling. They both are built for a different purpose.
Matt Farah from Road & Track has spent some time with the Lexus RC F Track Edition, and has little positive to say:
It also costs nearly $97,000—four large more than the absolutely stunning, unapologetic, and brilliant LC500 and $10,000 more than the equally brilliant, but very subtle GSF sedan. On the track…it simply isn’t much fun, and certainly isn’t $30,000 more fun than the car on which it’s based.
Save your money and get a GS F or LC500 while Lexus still makes this phenomenal engine.
On the track…it simply isn’t much fun
When this hits the pre-owned market, I wonder how the demand will still be (IF)