Yeah their were rumours circulating that mirai might get a hybrid powertrain and with them switching fcev to commercial it does make senseIs this our first glimpse of the next-gen LS BEV ("LZ")?
View attachment 6890
Also, 200km+ EV range PHEV planned in the future. (I think this is the most interesting part of the briefing)
Officially moved away from FCEV on passenger cars and focus on commercial vehicles instead.
Like do we really even need EVs at this point if they're going to offer PHEVs that have over 200km range?Continue to make its hybrid vehicles more efficient and affordable and offering plug-in hybrids with an extended EV-only range of over 200 km (124 miles)
This makes me happy too.Continue pursuing development of hydrogen and other alternative fuels
Like do we really even need EVs at this point if they're going to offer PHEVs that have over 200km range?
If anything this tells me we're going to have our vroom vrooms for practically the foreseeable future and that makes me happy.
This makes me happy too.
Why would anyone buy an EV if this existed? WOW! I love PHEVs, have had plugin Prius and RAV4 Prime (and 2 Teslas). PHEV makes a lot of sense but most have so little EV range they just aren't desirable.Continue to make its hybrid vehicles more efficient and affordable and offering plug-in hybrids with an extended EV-only range of over 200 km (124 miles)
I'm not really battery literate. Will this purported doubling in battery range/efficiency also mean a dramatic decrease in charging times?
While we've entertained an electric vehicle, the time difference between charging an electric vehicle and gassing up an ICE is a big deterrent for us.
That was my first thought also. But it got me thinking what trade-offs were (or will be) necessary in order to combine a battery big enough to provide 200km of range AND an internal combustion engine.Why would anyone buy an EV if this existed? WOW! I love PHEVs, have had plugin Prius and RAV4 Prime (and 2 Teslas). PHEV makes a lot of sense but most have so little EV range they just aren't desirable.
Range extenders are extremely inefficient unless it's a dedicated generator design like Toyota's free-piston linear generator. I wonder what happened to that project. It has a tank-to-battery efficiency of 40% and produces 15kW/cylinder. So for continuous driving 2 cylinders are needed for a compact car and 4 cylinders for a 3-row SUV.What about that range extender? Is it only a small, weak serial-hybrid range extender that will never drive the wheels, and not the more-powerful engine in the serial-parallel hybrid that enthusiasts have come to rely upon when we need more power?
The 2026 new architecture will be 800V and supports up to 350kW charging with CCS 2.0 but realistically the time savings is ~40% vs. a 150kW charger (charging curves for batteries are not linear). So it would still take ~18-25min to charge 10-80% depending on battery size.I'm not really battery literate. Will this purported doubling in battery range/efficiency also mean a dramatic decrease in charging times?
While we've entertained an electric vehicle, the time difference between charging an electric vehicle and gassing up an ICE is a big deterrent for us.