Not offering a competitive set of luxury amenities in a luxury-branded car is what's stupid, not pointing out such a fact. The current E-Class, 5-series, A6, and heck, even the Q70 and MKZ all offer massaging seats, so why shouldn't the GS?
I totally agree the GS F should have massaging seats (and in the USA the luxury package that the Canadians get). It's stunning the GS F loses the power rear trunk and rear windshield shade as well in the USA. Its utterly perplexing for that price. I would think for 84k, the car is COMPLETELY loaded since its down 100hp.
They are damn near deal breakers. The GS F seats while fabulous, only have like 8 or 10 adjustments which is ridiculous when the F-Sport has 16 and the luxury package has 18.
Makes absolutely no sense.
That said as Clarkson noted, you kind of forget that a bit if you get a chance to push this car. It is really one of the best driving cars out today at any price.
I agree on the massaging seats from a pure-comfort point of view, but I'm not sure that I'd want them turned on if I was actually using the GS-F's power or handling capabilities on the road. They're OK for cruising or non-aggressive driving, but (at least as I see it....others are free to disagree), that kind of power and ability, when actually used, demands 100% concentration on the road...which may be hard to do while getting one's butt massaged.