GM debuts new 4 cylinder engine for 2019 Silverado

CIF

Premium Member
Messages
1,675
Reactions
1,825
http://media.chevrolet.com/media/us...ews/us/en/2018/may/0518--silverado-turbo.html

DETROIT — The all-new 2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 will be offered with an all-new, technologically advanced 2.7L Turbo that expands the range of available engines and builds upon additional choices to help customers find the Silverado that perfectly suits their needs.

Standard on LT and RST trims, the new engine delivers an SAE-certified 310 horsepower and 348 lb-ft of torque, for 22 percent more torque than the 4.3L V-6 it replaces. Developed specifically for truck applications, the new 2.7L Turbo inline four-cylinder engine delivers peak torque from 1,500 to 4,000 rpm.

The next-gen Silverado with the 2.7L Turbo delivers 0-60 mph performance in less than seven seconds and weighs 380 pounds less than the current Silverado with the 4.3L V-6. Compared with competitive full-size trucks, the Silverado 2.7L Turbo is expected to deliver comparable payload capability with greater torque than the 3.3L V-6 in the Ford F-150 XLT and the 3.6L V-6 in the Ram 1500 Big Horn.

“The new 2.7L Turbo is a technological marvel, with our most advanced valvetrain,” said Tom Sutter, chief engineer for the 2.7L Turbo. “With a broad, flat torque curve and quick throttle response, it punches above its weight, delivering surprising performance and efficiency.”

The cornerstone of the 2.7L Turbo is an innovative double overhead cam valvetrain that enables:

  • Chevrolet’s first use of Active Fuel Management (cylinder deactivation) on a four-cylinder engine.
  • High- and low-lift valve profiles.
  • Continuously variable valve timing.
Additional engine technologies supporting the engine’s performance and efficiency include:

  • Dual-volute turbocharger housing for improved throttle response and low-speed torque.
  • Chevrolet’s first application of Active Thermal Management, which uses targeted engine heating and cooling to improve engine performance in hot and cold ambient temperatures.
  • An integrated exhaust manifold that is part of the cylinder head assembly and recovers exhaust heat for faster engine and transmission warmup, with quicker turbo response.
  • Stop/start technology that automatically stops the engine in stop-and-go traffic for fuel efficiency.
  • An electric water pump that eliminates the drag of a conventional, engine-driven pump to enhance efficiency. It also enables continual cabin heating even when the engine is disabled by the stop/start feature.
Designed as a truck engine

The new 2.7L Turbo engine represents a clean-sheet design for Chevrolet and was developed from the outset as a truck engine.

To help generate the strong low-end torque customers expect in a truck, it was designed with a long piston stroke of 4.01 inches (102mm), which is the distance the piston travels up and down within the cylinder.

The long stroke enables improved combustion and thus a higher compression ratio. Typically, a long stroke can increase the load of the pistons against the cylinder walls, generating more friction. That’s alleviated in the 2.7L Turbo with an offset crankshaft. It is slightly off-center of the cylinders, allowing a more upright position for the connecting rods during their movement.

To support the high cylinder pressures that come with turbocharging, the crankshaft and connecting rods are made of forged steel and the pistons are made of a tough aluminum alloy with a cast iron ring groove insert.

All elements of the 2.7L Turbo were designed for the demands of turbocharged performance in a truck environment, and the engine was subjected to the same rigorous durability standards as the Silverado’s proven V-8 engines.

The 2.7L Turbo features an aluminum block and cylinder head for reduced mass.

Unique valvetrain offers more precise control

The 2.7L Turbo’s valvetrain is GM’s first to incorporate variable lift, duration and Active Fuel Management to optimize performance and efficiency across the rpm band. It is a key reason the engine’s peak torque is available at only 1,500 rpm.

The system’s electro-mechanical variable camshaft effectively allows the engine to operate with three different camshaft profiles, complementing the variable valve timing system to deliver optimized operating modes for different engine speeds and loads:

1. High valve lift for full power.

2. Low valve lift for balance of power and efficiency.

3. Active Fuel Management shuts down two of the cylinders in light load conditions to further conserve fuel.

“It’s like having different engines for low- and high-rpm performance,” said Sutter. “The camshaft profile and valve timing is completely different at low and high speeds, for excellent performance across the board.”

The camshaft design alters the lift of the intake and exhaust valves. As the engine load changes, electromagnetic actuators allow a movable shaft containing different cam lobes to shift imperceptibly between high-lift and low-lift profiles.

Lift is the distance the valve travels from its seat when opened, and duration is the amount of time the valve remains open. Higher lift and longer duration allow more air to flow into the combustion chamber, so the system’s high-lift lobe profile enhances performance at higher rpm, while the low-lift profile optimizes efficiency at low- and mid-range speeds.

Dual-volute turbocharger builds torque

The 2.7L Turbo engine employs an advanced dual-volute turbocharger that elevates the performance and efficiency advantages of a conventional turbo, with quicker response and enhanced low-rpm torque production.

Rather than a single spiral chamber (volute) feeding exhaust gas from the exhaust manifold to drive the turbine on the turbocharger, the dual volute design has a pair of separate chambers with two exhaust gas inlets and two nozzles to drive the turbine. The design allows the exhaust pulses of the engine to be leveraged for faster spool-up and subsequent boost production, particularly at low rpm, where the effect significantly enhances torque output and drivability.

It works in unison with the engine’s integrated exhaust manifold/turbocharger housing, which splits the exhaust channels from the cylinder head so the exhaust flows through two separate channels in the turbo housing, based on the engine’s exhaust pulses. When complemented by the precision of the engine’s valvetrain, that separation leverages exhaust scavenging techniques to optimize gas flow, which decreases exhaust gas temperatures, improves turbine efficiency and reduces turbo lag.

An electronically controlled wastegate and charge-air cooling system support the turbocharger and enhance its effectiveness. Compared to a conventional wastegate, the electronically controlled version offers more precise management of the engine’s boost pressure for smoother, more consistent performance.

With the charge-air cooler, the pressurized, heated air generated by the turbocharger is pumped through a heat exchanger before it enters the engine. That lowers the air charge temperature by about 130 degrees F (74 C), packing the combustion chambers with cooler, denser air that enhances power production. The system achieves more than 80 percent cooling efficiency with less than 2 psi (12 kPa) flow restriction at peak power, contributing to the engine’s available torque production at low rpm.

Additional features

A variable-pressure oiling system with a continuously variable-displacement vane oil pump enhances efficiency by optimizing oil pressure as a function of engine speed and load. With it, the oil supply is matched to the engine requirements rather than the excessive supply of a conventional, fixed-displacement oil pump.

Active Thermal Management helps the engine warm up faster and achieve its optimal engine temperature for performance and efficiency. The system uses a rotary valve system to distribute coolant through the engine in a targeted manner. It sends heat where it’s needed to warm up the engine to reduce friction and heat the cab, or cools when needed for high power operation.

An electric water pump — a first for Chevy trucks supports the Active Thermal Management system and further enhances the engine’s performance and efficiency by eliminating the parasitic drag that comes with a conventional engine-driven water pump.

Direct fuel injection is used to optimize efficiency and performance. With direct injection, a higher compression ratio (10.0:1) is possible because of a cooling effect as the injected fuel vaporizes in the combustion chamber, reducing the charge temperature and improving resistance to spark knock. Direct injection also enables gas scavenging from the combustion chamber to the turbo for fast response.

Dual overhead camshafts contribute to the 2.7L Turbo’s smoothness and high output, with dual independent continuously variable valve timing working with the valvetrain to deliver optimal performance and efficiency. The dual independent system, which allows the intake and exhaust valves to be phased at different rates, promotes linear delivery of torque with near-peak levels over a broad rpm range, and high specific output (horsepower per liter of displacement) without sacrificing overall engine response or driveability.

An integrated exhaust manifold on the cylinder head assembly promotes faster engine warmup and quicker turbo response.

Oil jets located in the block are employed for performance and temperature control. They target the underside of the pistons and the surrounding cylinder walls with an extra layer of cooling, friction-reducing oil. The jets reduce piston temperature, allowing the engine to produce more power and enhance long-term durability.

Stop/start enhances fuel economy in city driving. The driver-selectable system shuts off the engine at stoplights and certain other stop-and-go situations, saving fuel. The engine automatically restarts when the driver takes their foot off the brake.

The all-new 2.7L Turbo is matched with a Hydra-Matic eight-speed automatic transmission featuring enhancements designed to improve shift quality, as well as a new centrifugal pendulum absorber torque converter that reduces vibrations to improve smoothness.

The all-new 2.7L Turbo will be built at the General Motors Spring Hill facility in Tennessee.

The 2019 Silverado goes on sale this fall. EPA fuel economy estimates and towing/payload capacities are not yet available and will be announced closer to launch.

Slightly old news, but I felt important to post this. I never ever thought we would see such a day, yet here we are. GM has debuted a brand new 2.7L inline 4 turbo engine that not only has cylinder deactivation, but also comes with a stop-start system. Not only that, they debuted this on their body-on-frame truck platform, which is the last platform one would normally expect for such an engine.

Performance numbers look good on paper, but given the massive reliability problems Ford Ecoboost engines have in the real world, on paper matters little. The funny thing is also that particulates/emissions from this engine as well as real-world fuel economy numbers are very likely to be the same or worse than a comparable state of the art naturally aspirated V6 engine.

The cylinder deactivation system turns off 2 cylinders when active, making it a 2 cylinder turbo engine at times. Combined with the stop-start system, I can't even imagine how annoying this is going to be in real-world driving situations. The NVH problems alone I imagine will be quite high. The press release claims the stop-start system is driver selectable. I'm not sure if that means it can be disabled permanently, but that's little consolation given the cylinder deactivation system certainly cannot be defeated.

Many drivability and reliability issues have been known about for years with cylinder deactivation systems from Honda and GM on V6 and V8 engines. The fact that GM has put this onto an inline 4 turbo engine with stop-start functionality I can only imagine will increase the drivability and reliability problems in the real world.

Further rumors indicate this new engine will likely appear on GM's next-generation body-on-frame SUVs as well.

GM products generally do not appeal to me, and I generally don't even pay attention to GM. However in this case, as an automotive enthusiast I feel it is my duty to convince anyone I know to steer away from any product with this abomination of an engine. The strongest feedback a customer can give to a company is voting with their wallet.
 

Gecko

Administrator
Messages
4,752
Reactions
11,384
Unfortunately, a lot of this has to do with EPA rating systems and legal regulation - there is little benefit in the real world, as you note. On paper, the engine is very impressive - 310hp and 348 lb-ft of torque - but saddled with stop/start and cylinder deactivation... not my cup of tea.

Regardless, I give kudos to GM for engineering a seemingly very impressive engine. I bet the Colorado won't even offer a 6 cylinder engine once this engine debuts.
 

Gecko

Administrator
Messages
4,752
Reactions
11,384
I think cylinder deactivation and stop/start are more make-good concessions instead of technologies with a real impact on MPG. Just my experience with both. They're gimmicks, but OEMs are doing whatever they can to make MPG targets.
 
Last edited:

ssun30

Expert
Messages
3,345
Reactions
7,462
>>Downsizing via turbocharging: better fuel economy and towing capacity at cost of reliability.
>>Two-stage Variable Valve Lift: almost irrelevant since it's not continuous VVL. Staged VVLs are so 1990s. Somewhat useful for towing?
>>Start-stop system: demonstrable fuel economy gains in regions with heavy urban traffic, almost useless in the U.S.
>>Cylinder deactivation: this gimmick has been proven to not work. GM is the sole supporter.
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,157
Reactions
2,675
That's an impressive feat of engineering, but I can't imagine driving it will be fun in the real world.


Large-displacement fours, in the past, have had a tendency to be unrefined. Modern engineering, of course, will help, but let's see if they can develop this engine without having it sound and run like a farm tractor LOL.
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,157
Reactions
2,675
>>Start-stop system: demonstrable fuel economy gains in regions with heavy urban traffic, almost useless in the U.S.
>>Cylinder deactivation: this gimmick has been proven to not work. GM is the sole supporter.

With all due respect, I'm going to disagree with this part of your statement. I have the latest version of both GM's latest stop/start and cylinder de-activation in my new (2018) Buick Lacrosse and its 3.6L V6, and they not only work seamlessly, but also significantly increase fuel mileage. I average low-to-mid-20s in town, and well over 30 on the highway...which IMO is commendable for an engine and car that size. That's as good or better mileage than I had with the Verano I previously owned.....which had GM's much smaller 2.4L four.

As I replied to Ian, though, above, getting a modern V6 to run smoothly is one thing.....large-displacement fours may (?) be another story.
 

ssun30

Expert
Messages
3,345
Reactions
7,462
With all due respect, I'm going to disagree with this part of your statement. I have the latest version of both GM's latest stop/start and cylinder de-activation in my new (2018) Buick Lacrosse and its 3.6L V6, and they not only work seamlessly, but also significantly increase fuel mileage. I average low-to-mid-20s in town, and well over 30 on the highway...which IMO is commendable for an engine and car that size. That's as good or better mileage than I had with the Verano I previously owned.....which had GM's much smaller 2.4L four.

As I replied to Ian, though, above, getting a modern V6 to run smoothly is one thing.....large-displacement fours may (?) be another story.

Good to know you are taking advantage of that. In industry studies, start-stop is usually quoted to give on average 3% gains in real world and about 7% in the easily exploitable NEDC testing. I didn't see any improvement with start-stop on my Volvo XC60, mostly because it uses hydraulic power steering. But on vehicles with electric power steering and electric transmission hydraulic pumps I've seen gains of over 5% in urban traffic. I think the negativity with start-stop in the U.S. is mostly due to low level of electrification in early vehicles equipped with such systems.

You know, I said turbocharged I4 instead of large displacement V6 is a good idea, and I usually get some hate for that. So I just have to mix in some 'me-too' comments...
 

mikeavelli

Moderator
Messages
6,805
Reactions
15,210
I'm really believing I would skip past these turbo 4's and go with a hybrid in some way to help fuel economy and torque....
 

CIF

Premium Member
Messages
1,675
Reactions
1,825
So the news is even worse. Apparently ALL of the V8s on the Sierra and Silverado (and I'm guessing on all GM products period going forward) have an even more advanced cylinder deactivation system that enables the V8s to run on 17 different cylinder settings. Yes that means even the V8 engines can run on as little as 2 cylinders! Oh and the V6 engine as well has the older form of cylinder deactivation.

So every single gas engine on the new Sierra and Silverado will have cylinder deactivation. Looks like the only engine without cylinder deactivation on these trucks might be the coming 3.0L diesel.

In related news, apparently even Mazda has now added cylinder deactivation to its 2.5L 4 cyl on some models. That can run on as little as 2 cylinders as well.

I think this is a horrible trend, and also a lazy trend as there are many, many other ways to meet government fuel economy standards than this. I will definitely vote with my wallet and avoid any and all products that feature intrusive and short-sighted technologies like this.
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,157
Reactions
2,675
I think this is a horrible trend, and also a lazy trend as there are many, many other ways to meet government fuel economy standards than this. I will definitely vote with my wallet and avoid any and all products that feature intrusive and short-sighted technologies like this.

What do you find so objectionable about it? Looks to me like a reasonably good way to balance economy and power when either one of them are desired.
 

CIF

Premium Member
Messages
1,675
Reactions
1,825
What do you find so objectionable about it? Looks to me like a reasonably good way to balance economy and power when either one of them are desired.

I've driven vehicles with some existing cylinder deactivation systems. Real world fuel economy improvement is either non-existent or very tiny (1-2% or so, definitely less than 5%). I find the systems very intrusive in city driving, especially in heavy stop and go traffic. The systems I also find to be intrusive out on the highway. Intrusive not just in NVH but also in strange sensations when cylinders are activating or deactivating. Personally it feels punishing driving vehicles with such systems without much benefit. To me it greatly diminishes my comfort when driving any vehicle with one of these systems.

For automakers using these systems, it might seem like a cheap, easy and lazy way to improve fuel economy ratings on government standardized tests. However you can't cheat physics. No matter whatever reinforcements they build in, all the constant cylinder deactivations back and forth places tremendous stress on the engine drivetrain and also on the transmission. Ironically these reinforcements add extra cost, so in total these systems end up being not as cheap, easy and lazy as originally thought by automakers using them. That's not to mention the very long-term reliability and durability problems that result from these systems. Do some research on existing Honda and GM vehicles with such systems. Lots of problems occur long-term, and many real world owners have posted plenty about it all over the internet. This is well known information for Honda and GM enthusiasts. I know that many Honda fans actively avoid vehicles with cylinder deactivation. There are even aftermarket "cheat" systems that exist that try and disable the cylinder deactivation.

These systems, just like stop-start systems, provide a nice statistical benefit to government standardized testing, but little real world benefit.

Some people may disagree or not even notice these systems, but this is simply my opinion.

I'm totally with mikeavelli on this one. If one is obsessed with getting extra fuel economy, or likes stop-start systems, you might as well get a hybrid instead where such systems feel less intrusive and where the entire drivetrain and powertrain is designed from the start (on a proper full hybrid) to withstand the constant starting and stopping.

How is it that an automaker like Toyota is able to get class leading fuel economy with its new Dynamic Force engines without having to resort to such gimmicks? It's because Toyota did not take the cheap, easy and lazy way. Toyota took the long and hard way and did a lot of proper R&D work on their new engines which ensure not only good government fuel economy testing ratings, but great fuel economy improvements in the real world. Yes a small number of gas engine Toyota models do have stop-start systems, but I cannot imagine that Toyota will ever implement it on a large scale, and these models are only a very small percentage of the entire Toyota lineup. Depending on owner feedback, Toyota could also fully eliminate stop-start from these small number of gas engine models.
 
Last edited:

Joaquin Ruhi

Moderator
Messages
1,529
Reactions
2,434
I've driven vehicles with some existing cylinder deactivation systems. Real world fuel economy improvement is either non-existent or very tiny (1-2% or so, definitely less than 5%)...

For automakers using these systems, it might seem like a cheap, easy and lazy way to improve fuel economy ratings on government standardized tests. However you can't cheat physics. No matter whatever reinforcements they build in, all the constant cylinder deactivations back and forth places tremendous stress on the engine drivetrain and also on the transmission. Ironically these reinforcements add extra cost, so in total these systems end up being not as cheap, easy and lazy as originally thought by automakers using them. That's not to mention the very long-term reliability and durability problems that result from these systems. Do some research on existing Honda and GM vehicles with such systems. Lots of problems occur long-term, and many real world owners have posted plenty about it all over the internet. This is well known information for Honda and GM enthusiasts. I know that many Honda fans actively avoid vehicles with cylinder deactivation. There are even aftermarket "cheat" systems that exist that try and disable the cylinder deactivation.

These systems, just like stop-start systems, provide a nice statistical benefit to government standardized testing, but little real world benefit...

How is it that an automaker like Toyota is able to get class leading fuel economy with its new Dynamic Force engines without having to resort to such gimmicks? It's because Toyota did not take the cheap, easy and lazy way. Toyota took the long and hard way and did a lot of proper R&D work on their new engines which ensure not only good government fuel economy testing ratings, but great fuel economy improvements in the real world. Yes a small number of gas engine Toyota models do have stop-start systems, but I cannot imagine that Toyota will ever implement it on a large scale, and these models are only a very small percentage of the entire Toyota lineup. Depending on owner feedback, Toyota could also fully eliminate stop-start from these small number of gas engine models.

This takes me back to my Kaizen Factor Lexus GS F review, which contains these passages:

Among the E-segment supersedans, BMW M5/M6 and Cadillac CTS-V bite the bullet and pay the Guzzler Tax, while Audi RS7 and Mercedes E63 avoid it via a combination of stop-start technology and cylinder deactivation. And Lexus? Again, it obstinately marches to the beat of its own Taiko drum...

(T)he January 2014 Detroit Auto Show unveiling of the RC F coupe also saw the debut of version 2 of the 2UR-GSE 5-liter V8. The highlight of its suite of modifications versus the original: the capability of running on either a hybrid-like Atkinson cycle at cruising speeds or on the conventional Otto cycle when more oomph is called for. Other improvements include VVT-iE (Variable Valve Timing – intelligent by Electric motor) on all 4 cams, new heads with titanium valves, larger throttle body and a lighter crankshaft and connecting rods...

But why no cylinder deactivation?
I posed this question to Lexus International’s U.S. Manager of Strategic Communications & Education Paul Williamsen at the RC F world debut in 2014. His reply: “Dual Otto/Atkinson cycle functionality provides much of the benefits of cylinder deactivation with greater smoothness, less complexity and lighter weight”.
 

mikeavelli

Moderator
Messages
6,805
Reactions
15,210
With the current adminstrations rollback on fuel economy and taking a completely different stance on things... GM must be pissed lol..
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,157
Reactions
2,675
I've driven vehicles with some existing cylinder deactivation systems. Real world fuel economy improvement is either non-existent or very tiny (1-2% or so, definitely less than 5%). I find the systems very intrusive in city driving, especially in heavy stop and go traffic.

The systems in my new Lacrosse seem to significantly increase fuel mileage. With the efficient 9-speed transmission, engine start/stop, and cylinder deactivation at cruise, on a non-turbo V6 capable of 305 HP and 268 ft-lbs. of torque, in a 3550-lb car, I'm getting 20-25 MPG in town and 30-35 on the road, on regular 87 octane. That's as good or better than with some of the previous N/A fours that I've owned.

There are even aftermarket "cheat" systems that exist that try and disable the cylinder deactivation.

On the Lacrosse, the start/stop system doesn't work in manual-shift mode. It also doesn't work during some conditions of cold engine temperature, A/C load on the compressor, or battery-charge status. Plus, you can sometimes fool the system, even in regular auto-drive mode, while you are virtually at a full-stop, by feathering the brake pedal just right and allowing some very slow creep when idling......but, of course, you have to have enough distance between you and the vehicle ahead of you for that.
 
Last edited: