F1 Silver Arrows
Expert
- Messages
- 2,387
- Reactions
- 3,858
Hopefully they put in the Camry's new 4-cylinder engine along with that 8-speed automatic. And please...... bring back that legendary RAV-4 V6. :heart_eyes:
Hopefully they put in the Camry's new 4-cylinder engine along with that 8-speed automatic. And please...... bring back that legendary RAV-4 V6. :heart_eyes:
Yeah, but it was amazing how they put a V6 in their smallest platform (MC platform, ignoring Prius C). Imagine if someone put that massive 3.5L V6 in the Corolla (crazy I know). Clearly many people bought them, I see so many V6 RAV-4's it makes me think why WOULD'NT they make it again. I know they are more geared to fuel economy, but the current generation in terms of quality and performance was very lackluster.
One thing that I believe they do need a lot of work on, is a proper AWD system. The capability of current generaiton RAV4 is embarrassing especially considering the '4' in the name stands for 4WD.
Yeah a V6 in the Rav4 won't happen. Toyota, like virtually every other automaker, has jumped on the powertrain downsizing bandwagon. We can be thankful that Toyota isn't downsizing as much as other competitors, but that's not saying much. The Camry for example still has a V6, but you now have to pay a considerable premium for it. Gone are the 'glory days' of the 2000s when many Toyota and Lexus models had standard or optional large engines. The Rav4 had an optional V6, the 4Runner had an optional V8, the Lexus GS had an optional V8, and the Lexus LS had a standard V8. Gone are those days, and it's likely we may never see those days again at Toyota Motor Co.
While I agree that Toyota definitely needs a better 'standard' AWD system, the current Rav4 is hardly embarrassing. In real-world tests, the current Rav4 performs better than the CR-V off-road, its direct competitor in the market. Now the CR-V, and many Honda products in general I would definitely say deserve the title of embarrassing AWD systems. The only exception is Honda's excellent SH-AWD system. That though is only available on a select few Acura models, and not available on any Honda models (in North America at least).
Yeah a V6 in the Rav4 won't happen. Toyota, like virtually every other automaker, has jumped on the powertrain downsizing bandwagon. We can be thankful that Toyota isn't downsizing as much as other competitors, but that's not saying much. The Camry for example still has a V6, but you now have to pay a considerable premium for it. Gone are the 'glory days' of the 2000s when many Toyota and Lexus models had standard or optional large engines. The Rav4 had an optional V6, the 4Runner had an optional V8, the Lexus GS (regular model) had an optional V8, and the Lexus LS had a standard V8. Gone are those days, and it's likely we may never see those days again at Toyota Motor Co.
While I agree that Toyota definitely needs a better 'standard' AWD system, the current Rav4 is hardly embarrassing. In real-world tests, the current Rav4 performs better than the CR-V off-road, its direct competitor in the market. Now the CR-V, and many Honda products in general I would definitely say deserve the title of embarrassing AWD systems. The only exception is Honda's excellent SH-AWD system. That though is only available on a select few Acura models, and not available on any Honda models (in North America at least).
I'm not sure what to think. The current E170 larger "International Corolla" was launched around June 2013. If the Corolla RFP is dated June 2017, that would put Job One around June 2018 (2019 model year) and put the E170 on a 5-year cycle, which is something Toyota hasn't done in a long time. That's too late for a regular facelift unless it's an extensive one like Lexus' 4LS's (which ultimately was built for 11 model years), but I just don't see that happening for a mass-market car like Corolla.I just realized that FAW/Toyota posts all of its biddings online when acquiring tooling for new models (probably required by the government). This basically lets out all the inside information on its projects:
http://www.chinabidding.com/bidDetail/231512912.html ...There is usually a 12-month gap between RFP for tooling and Job One...
There are also RFPs for tooling for the "new generation Corolla" since June 2017. Considering the current generation Corolla is not that old, I believe this is more likely a facelift than an actual update but possibly incorporating some TNGA concepts.
A couple of random possibilities come to mind: Is Toyota borrowing from Volkswagen's Chinese playbook and planning to produce both the current E170 and its E190 successor (likely due around June 2019 for the 2020 model year) at the same time?
It seems that in the future they will charge increasing amount of premium for more cylinders. Eight for the halo car, six for luxury, while its bread and butter will move to four cylinders only. I won't be surprised if 7ES debuts with a 2.5 turbo 4 instead of the highly anticipated 3.0 V6TT, we can still hope though...(think about it, a 2.5 turbo 4 makes a lot more sense for its light trucks and SUVs).
We should appreciate their decency to not put inline-3s everywhere. At least we won't find an inline-3 in an IS like poor BMW buyers do.
Yes the CR-V is a more direct competitor so the RAV4 is not that bad compared to the abysmal AWD on the CR-V. But other manufacturers have stepped up the game after years of giving free marketing material (aka bad AWD) for Subaru. Mazda is a notable example. I have not tried CX-5's AWD so I can't really comment, but there is some praise about it.
Subaru probably had the best marketing campaign in the automotive history by successfully convincing Americans that they absolutely need AWD for snow and rain and that their AWD is absolutely the best without close competition (both are false). Their overwhelming success in recent years has forced competitors to develop more serious AWD systems, and I do think Toyota does not want to fall behind in that respective.