2018 Chevy Equinox

Gecko

Administrator
Messages
5,147
Reactions
12,661
2018-chevrolet-equinox-001-1.jpg


2018-chevrolet-equinox-002-1.jpg


2018-chevrolet-equinox-006-1.jpg


2018-chevrolet-equinox-007-1.jpg


It might have flown under your radar – but there's a new 2018 Chevy Equinox. Fittingly, it was revealed yesterday on the Fall Equinox, but unlike the weather, which remains summer-like across much of the country, Chevy's compact sport utility vehicle is in for a big change. Here's the breakdown:

It has a diesel! C'mon. An American SUV with a diesel engine? For reals? It's a 1.6-liter turbocharged four-cylinder with a lot of low-end punch: It's estimated to put out 136 horsepower (at 3,500-4,000 rpm) and 236 pound-feet of torque (at 2,000 rpm). The real headliner: an estimated 40 miles per gallon on the highway.

That's a serious number. Think about, it's one thing to get 40 mpg in a Smart car, but40 in a Labrador-hauling SUV? This could fit a lot of families' lifestyles. Dropping a diesel into the Equinox is also gutsy. It's almost one year to the day Volkswagen's diesel scandal blew up. Short of shrapnel-spewing Takata airbags, few technologies are less popular with US buyers.

General Motors argues there's a market for diesels, and it's already using a version of this engine in the Chevy Cruze. Plus, it's selling a 2.8-liter diesel four in the Chevy Colorado and GMC Canyon pickups. If Americans warm to oil-burners, there's clear opportunity with VW sidelined.

"We continue to have a positive outlook for diesel technology as it remains the most efficient internal combustion engine option, and diesel technology will continue to be an important solution to achieving fuel economy and CO2 goals in a global economy," GM spokesman Tom Read told Autoblog.

It's a low-risk play for GM. The new Equinox offers two other gasoline engines, both turbocharged four-cylinders. If the diesel doesn't gain traction, no big deal. But 40 mpg in an SUV? That could sway buyers from Ford and Honda to join Chevy's fold. The diesel arrives next summer, along with the 252-hp four-cylinder. The Equinox launches with a 170-hp four-banger in the spring.

Two other reasons....

New Design: As expected, the Equinox has a fresh look that beings it inline with the Malibu, Volt, and Cruze. It's evident in the doors and side panels, which have similar lines to the rest of the Chevy brood. New lights front and rear and a more interesting upscale grille complete the look.

Details, Details: Chevy stripped out 400 pounds from the last generation, which helps with fuel economy. With tighter CAFE rules threatening, it's good practice to make a vehicle as light as possible. Naturally, Chevy added a few bells and whistles to spruce up the 'Nox, like a rear-seat alert if you leave little Sarah or Bruiser the Dog in Row Two, forward collision alert, low speed automatic braking, and a surround vision feature.

So yes, the diesel and its 40-mpg claim is the head-turner, but the Equinox is now fortified with new tech and a snazzy design that make it much more formidable. Sales have slipped 17.7 percent this year, but it's still Chevy's second-best selling model behind only the Silverado. Clearly the Equinox needed to turn over a new leaf, which makes these enhancements especially timely. It's a new season, quite literally, for this compact ute.

Source: http://www.autoblog.com/2016/09/23/-2018-chevy-equinox-diesel-features/#slide-4072295


I could link to the press release and associated materials but I really like the AutoBlog article above because it sums up the high points.

Truly, for Chevy to scrap 400lbs from the Equinox and drop in a 40MPG diesel option is very impressive. This new platform also has a longer wheelbase than many others in the class, but an overall length that is about average, so the wheels are pushed out to the corners. In addition, I don't think it's half bad looking.

However, it's just sad to me that GM still can't design an interior to save their lives. They've been using the same transmission stalk for 20 years, and pulling straight back vertically with no gated pattern is decidedly cheap. The integration of the LCD screen looks like an after thought. That steering wheel says "economy" circa 1999 and the font GM uses for interior gauges and buttons should have at least been updated once in the last thirty years.

I know I'm being harsh, but it's sad because this package seems to really be 90% of the way there, but GM continues to strike out on interiors, especially with Chevrolet. They just can't get it right, and it's disappointing. Ford's interiors used to be the same way, but they turned a corner and really do a sharp job these days. Same for FCA on some of their cars. Personally, I would probably rank Chevrolet/GMC as dead last in interior appeal in most of the segments they compete in.

I just don't know why GM can't get it right...
 
Messages
3,163
Reactions
3,785
Probably because of the beancounters...since CUV/SUVs are so hot right now, they need to get this to market sooner than later. If they need to refine the interior, they can wait for the refresh down the line. I doubt this will stop many from buying them because the demand is there. No offense, but I think I saw some of this in the current RAV4. The 2013 had a few bits that many didn't like, but with the 2016 refresh the RAV4 did the first iteration better.
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,164
Reactions
2,677
However, it's just sad to me that GM still can't design an interior to save their lives. They've been using the same transmission stalk for 20 years, and pulling straight back vertically with no gated pattern is decidedly cheap. The integration of the LCD screen looks like an after thought. That steering wheel says "economy" circa 1999 and the font GM uses for interior gauges and buttons should have at least been updated once in the last thirty years.

I know I'm being harsh, but it's sad because this package seems to really be 90% of the way there, but GM continues to strike out on interiors, especially with Chevrolet. They just can't get it right, and it's disappointing. Ford's interiors used to be the same way, but they turned a corner and really do a sharp job these days. Same for FCA on some of their cars. Personally, I would probably rank Chevrolet/GMC as dead last in interior appeal in most of the segments they compete in.

I just don't know why GM can't get it right...

Each to his or her opinion, of course, but I have to strongly disagree with this writer. I don't see anything wrong with the way GM, and especially Chevy, does their interiors. IMO, I FAR prefer a simple fore/aft shifter to those silly zig-zags, the Buick video Intellink system in particular is one of the easier ones to use, and the nice gold bow-tie symbol on the three-spoke Chevy steering wheels looks classy.

GM did, though, IMO, blow it on the new Cadillac XT5 and Buick Lacrosse with the electronic joystick-shifter on the console. As I just mentioned, the simple fore-aft shifter makes far more sense. (Interestingly enough, the new Cadillac CT6 flagship sedan's shifter is much like the old ones, except with a T-handle).
 
Last edited: