3.4L TTV6 Engine Failures (V35A-FTS) - Expanded Recall for LX and GX 550

Flagship1

Follower
Messages
495
Reactions
279
20240517_123937-jpg.3653719

Greetings. I'm the tech in Kai's video. My biggest concern is that even though toyota / lexus are warrantying engines due to debris, they will absolutely under no circumstances warranty anything else unless there's "visible" damage. This means the same turbos that have had debris going through the center cartridges will not be replaced.

We've had a v35a with absolutely wrecked camshafts and cam carriers which were replaced under warranty, but they would not let us replace anything else.


Best of luck to LX600 owners !

An update from the mechanic ft in the Tinkers adventure vid wayback when.
 

Gecko

Administrator
Messages
5,144
Reactions
12,617
Greetings. I'm the tech in Kai's video. My biggest concern is that even though toyota / lexus are warrantying engines due to debris, they will absolutely under no circumstances warranty anything else unless there's "visible" damage. This means the same turbos that have had debris going through the center cartridges will not be replaced.

We've had a v35a with absolutely wrecked camshafts and cam carriers which were replaced under warranty, but they would not let us replace anything else.

If this is true, it is surprising. I'm used to Toyota (and especially Lexus) going above and beyond when things like this happen, and doing what's right for the owner.

I was hoping there was a holistic fix (more comprehensive replacement of critical engine parts?) that would make people happy and put this issue behind us, but if Toyota is only moving to replace components with visual damage, I hope this doesn't become a case of "whack a mole" with people chasing down other issues through ownership. What happens then, and who pays?

If people end up chasing down turbo failures or cam issues after a short block or bearing replacement, it's going to make new and used buyers lose even more confidence in these products which I don't think Toyota can afford.

I hope that whatever official solution Toyota develops is a comprehensive one-and-done solution for impacted owners.
 

Flagship1

Follower
Messages
495
Reactions
279
I agree and anything before the official fix is released is conjecture.

To that end, realistically what folks are demanding in this situation and others like this for toyota specifically, to feel whole will typically not match. The situation sucks all around.

-8-9th gen corolla 1zzfe had oil burning issues. Toyota publicly acknowledged said issue only for the 9th generation, and through a series of TSBs ordered all effected customers to bring their engines in for an oil consumption test. More then 1qt/1k miles and the engine was deemed a failure. 8th gen owners were sol, and 9th gen owners only a few failed while most pre facelift 9th gen ended up failing the test post warranty.

-2azfe low tension oil ring failure. First it was a tsb. Then i dont remember if it was a class action or pure customer service that Toyota issued a warranty enhancement program for reimbursement/part replacement.

-Highlander facelift 8 speed at. Similar issue to what toyota is facing now where finding which transmissions are actually effected due to teardown requirements. They identified which production dates were effected, issued a tsb, then a warranty enchancement program. Problem was owners were effected outside the identified range, and toyota told em tough luck.

Ill try to add more examples, if I can, but again the company wants to get this done according to what engineers have identified and what works to get the vehicle back on the road and nothing more.
 

Ian Schmidt

Moderator
Messages
2,403
Reactions
4,238
Replacing the whole engine is a much better fix than what was described before. Glad they stepped up.
 

spwolf

Expert
Messages
3,582
Reactions
3,489
The anti-boost crowd conveniently forgot one of the most reliable engine Toyota produces right now is a turbodiesel.

very late, but i can assure you that did not happen.

Hopefully they fixed all the problems.
 

Flagship1

Follower
Messages
495
Reactions
279
Current warranty protocols will be the following:

***short block replacements until manufacturing capacity is reached for both in-use warranty support as well as assembly line support; at which time warranty replacements will transition to long block replacements for all in-use vehicles.

***Tundra short blocks will come from US-sourced TMMAL assembly; Yoshiwara trucks will receive Tahara assembly short blocks.

***Long blocks will come on-line, again, with TMMAL for Tundra, Tahara for LX600/LC300 (global platform, TNGA-F)

Current manufacturing capacity lead times for transition from short block to long block: 8-10 months.

Definitions:

TMMAL: Toyota Motor Manufacturing Alabama.

Tahara: Toyota Motor Corporation Tahara Manufacturing Plant.

Tahara manufactured short/long blocks **may be substituted** at the part number level for Tundra application, based on availability. (I’m assuming a number of supply chain caveats for this; will most likely happen only in the most extreme customer service situations.)
i think the smart play would just wait till the long blocks are available or try to get a direct swap trade in or lemon law.
 
Messages
2,566
Reactions
4,161
Current warranty protocols will be the following:

***short block replacements until manufacturing capacity is reached for both in-use warranty support as well as assembly line support; at which time warranty replacements will transition to long block replacements for all in-use vehicles.

***Tundra short blocks will come from US-sourced TMMAL assembly; Yoshiwara trucks will receive Tahara assembly short blocks.

***Long blocks will come on-line, again, with TMMAL for Tundra, Tahara for LX600/LC300 (global platform, TNGA-F)

Current manufacturing capacity lead times for transition from short block to long block: 8-10 months.

Definitions:

TMMAL: Toyota Motor Manufacturing Alabama.

Tahara: Toyota Motor Corporation Tahara Manufacturing Plant.

Tahara manufactured short/long blocks **may be substituted** at the part number level for Tundra application, based on availability. (I’m assuming a number of supply chain caveats for this; will most likely happen only in the most extreme customer service situations.)

i think the smart play would just wait till the long blocks are available or try to get a direct swap trade in or lemon law.

Dear lord. I have a hard time believing this all due to machining debris. I feel like there's something more to this.
 

Flagship1

Follower
Messages
495
Reactions
279
who knows wtf is going on....all i know is that this is bringing Toyota's legendary reliability into question.
 

mikeavelli

Moderator
Messages
7,486
Reactions
16,627
I’ve noticed resale took a hit. I think we lost about 10k in a month.

Otherwise the vehicle still has been great. 5 of us using the 3 rows (one rear seat down) with no issues. We just love it. 37k miles now.
IMG_3751.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3726.jpeg
    IMG_3726.jpeg
    1.8 MB · Views: 6

mikeavelli

Moderator
Messages
7,486
Reactions
16,627
Negatives are the same I had before. I really wish this had the 570 split gate. The door is way too long and things fall out even with the net. There should be more innovative cubby solutions. Not the usual doors and glovebox. Wireless charger is useless. Much quicker than the old 570 but thoughts of a higher power V-8 make the mind wonder. Also wish it had the digital mirror.

No one complains about space, compared to the reviewszz
 

qtb007

Admirer
Messages
537
Reactions
816
I’ve noticed resale took a hit. I think we lost about 10k in a month.

Otherwise the vehicle still has been great. 5 of us using the 3 rows (one rear seat down) with no issues. We just love it. 37k miles now.
View attachment 9500
Almost everything has taken a beating in resale the past couple months. The manufacturers are building at capacity and interest rates are high. Incentives are required to move metal.
 

Gecko

Administrator
Messages
5,144
Reactions
12,617
Here we go again - '24 LX and GX are now included despite the fact this was "fixed" with the previous recall for the same issue, 2024 MY+ V35A-FTS vehicles were all supposed to be fine, and evidently Toyota has no clue how to wash engine blocks (are we still buying that excuse?).

 

Gecko

Administrator
Messages
5,144
Reactions
12,617
I have bought only Toyota and Lexus products for the last 22 years of my life. I am loyal to the brand and a Toyota body-on-frame truck and SUV enthusiast, so this entire situation has disappointed me greatly. Toyota’s continued excuses and lack of transparency have broken my faith in anything with this engine and eroded my trust in the brand.

A little history...

Failures started in 2022 and Toyota denied them until they couldn’t anymore. 2022 and 2023 gas models finally got recalled in 2024 with continued customer complaints and vocal online communities, but Toyota excluded hybrids despite there being plenty of documented hybrid failures as well.

We continued to see 2023 and 2024 models - including hybrids and Sequoias - with failing engines and here we are in 2025 with it still ongoing, though seemingly in lower numbers. Now we have an expanded recall that includes the GX 550, which somehow we all hoped would be remedied and problem free considering the original recall covered 2022-2023 engines and the GX started production for 2024.

Over the years, Toyota has changed several part numbers on this engine - some multiple times - with bearings, rings, pistons, sealants, and even blocks. At times they have changed both materials and designs in conjunction with the part numbers, and we all hoped they would finally achieve a winning (functioning) formula. Failures continue. I never believed the machining debris explanation because it shouldn’t have existed at two different plants across several different teams, for several years, and by a manufacturing company as sophisticated as Toyota. In my opinion it is a cover up excuse for a critical engineering flaw.

If Toyota knew what was wrong with this engine, they would have fixed it by now. Period.

4 model years, countless revised part numbers, two half-assed recalls, and hundreds of failed engines later, and there has never been a follow up statement or any additional context from Toyota about what happened. We’re all supposed to believe the only problem was “machining debris” in 2022-2024 models and we all know damn well that’s a lie because we have documented failures in late 2023 models, 2024 models, 2025 models, hybrids, Sequoias, GX 550s, etc.

Not that I believe every dingbat with a computer, but master techs have given first hand accounts of what a disaster this has been and how many of these engines are starved for oil and burnt from the bottom up, some people getting 2-3 replacement engines because of repeated failures, and insight into all of the new part numbers and materials used in various updates over the years. The general consensus has been that there has to be a design flaw with this engine because the repeated failures and constant efforts to fix it have produced very little improvement, if any.

Toyota needs to figure out what really is wrong with this engine, redesign or update it accordingly, and then release a new version. A new engine designation with revised parts would be a major step in the right direction to providing SOME consumer confidence that they have fixed this issue. If they continue to ignore that this problem is much wider than they admit to, and many consumers know it, the company is doing major harm to their reputation for reliability and dependability.

Facebook groups, Reddit, and various Tundra/Toyota/Lexus communities have had the same stories for years:

“Oh yeah, the August 2023+ models are good!”...those start failing.
“2024 models have new part numbers, those are good!” ...those start failing.
“May 2024+ builds are solid now, we’re good.” ...those start failing.
"August 2024+ models have new part numbers for the blocks, so we should be clear now." ... those start failing.
“2025s are here… all of the kinks are worked out!” ...2025s have failures.
"GX 550s were built after the recall, so they're good!" ...GX 550 failures.
"Sequoias aren't included, they're safe." ...plenty of documented Sequoia failures.

Problems happen with every brand, but Toyota’s lack of communication or explanation in this situation has completely ruined my trust in this engine. I’ll never buy one until there is a massive update and we have 2-3 years of trucks with normal failure rates, but the thing that is worse is the fact that they're only acknowledging what they're being forced to by buyers, late, and without any transparency or explanation.

Shame.
 

CIF

Premium Member
Messages
1,704
Reactions
1,862
I have bought only Toyota and Lexus products for the last 22 years of my life. I am loyal to the brand and a Toyota body-on-frame truck and SUV enthusiast, so this entire situation has disappointed me greatly. Toyota’s continued excuses and lack of transparency have broken my faith in anything with this engine and eroded my trust in the brand.

A little history...

Failures started in 2022 and Toyota denied them until they couldn’t anymore. 2022 and 2023 gas models finally got recalled in 2024 with continued customer complaints and vocal online communities, but Toyota excluded hybrids despite there being plenty of documented hybrid failures as well.

We continued to see 2023 and 2024 models - including hybrids and Sequoias - with failing engines and here we are in 2025 with it still ongoing, though seemingly in lower numbers. Now we have an expanded recall that includes the GX 550, which somehow we all hoped would be remedied and problem free considering the original recall covered 2022-2023 engines and the GX started production for 2024.

Over the years, Toyota has changed several part numbers on this engine - some multiple times - with bearings, rings, pistons, sealants, and even blocks. At times they have changed both materials and designs in conjunction with the part numbers, and we all hoped they would finally achieve a winning (functioning) formula. Failures continue. I never believed the machining debris explanation because it shouldn’t have existed at two different plants across several different teams, for several years, and by a manufacturing company as sophisticated as Toyota. In my opinion it is a cover up excuse for a critical engineering flaw.

If Toyota knew what was wrong with this engine, they would have fixed it by now. Period.

4 model years, countless revised part numbers, two half-assed recalls, and hundreds of failed engines later, and there has never been a follow up statement or any additional context from Toyota about what happened. We’re all supposed to believe the only problem was “machining debris” in 2022-2024 models and we all know damn well that’s a lie because we have documented failures in late 2023 models, 2024 models, 2025 models, hybrids, Sequoias, GX 550s, etc.

Not that I believe every dingbat with a computer, but master techs have given first hand accounts of what a disaster this has been and how many of these engines are starved for oil and burnt from the bottom up, some people getting 2-3 replacement engines because of repeated failures, and insight into all of the new part numbers and materials used in various updates over the years. The general consensus has been that there has to be a design flaw with this engine because the repeated failures and constant efforts to fix it have produced very little improvement, if any.

Toyota needs to figure out what really is wrong with this engine, redesign or update it accordingly, and then release a new version. A new engine designation with revised parts would be a major step in the right direction to providing SOME consumer confidence that they have fixed this issue. If they continue to ignore that this problem is much wider than they admit to, and many consumers know it, the company is doing major harm to their reputation for reliability and dependability.

Facebook groups, Reddit, and various Tundra/Toyota/Lexus communities have had the same stories for years:

“Oh yeah, the August 2023+ models are good!”...those start failing.
“2024 models have new part numbers, those are good!” ...those start failing.
“May 2024+ builds are solid now, we’re good.” ...those start failing.
"August 2024+ models have new part numbers for the blocks, so we should be clear now." ... those start failing.
“2025s are here… all of the kinks are worked out!” ...2025s have failures.
"GX 550s were built after the recall, so they're good!" ...GX 550 failures.
"Sequoias aren't included, they're safe." ...plenty of documented Sequoia failures.

Problems happen with every brand, but Toyota’s lack of communication or explanation in this situation has completely ruined my trust in this engine. I’ll never buy one until there is a massive update and we have 2-3 years of trucks with normal failure rates, but the thing that is worse is the fact that they're only acknowledging what they're being forced to by buyers, late, and without any transparency or explanation.

Shame.

For all of you on the forum here with Toyota connections, the time has come. The time has come to put pressure on your Toyota connections to force more accountability and responsibility out of Toyota as a whole. This is only one of many problems at Toyota Motor Corporation right now. Yes there is a risk you may lose your Toyota connections. The alternative though is even worse. The alternative is sitting back and doing nothing and watching Toyota Motor Corporation continue to destroy its own reputation and quality and drastically decline as a company.
 
Last edited: