The 4Runner is the FJ replacement/Bronco competitor. The whole purpose of the LC250 in US market is to milk every dime out of this trademark. That's why you see all those corner cutting. Profit maximization is the only goal for this product.The product overlap between the upper 4Runner trims and LC250 doesn’t make any sense to me. For $65k, I’d rather have a LC250 over an upper spec 4Runner, but if I’m going to pay $65k for a LC250, I might as well by the GX550.
I think Toyota needs to add the V35A as an option to the LC250. The GX could then get the 389hp V35A (maybe even the 420hp tune), while the LX retains the hybrid max option. That gives us a nice progression of engine output from the 4Runner to the LX. The LC250 needs to offer the pano roof as well. Lowering the price on the 4Runner would help too. A $65k 4Runner is ridiculous.
This all goes back to what the Land Cruiser should’ve been: A FJ Cruiser replacement/Bronco competitor.
For the US too??Patent of LC250 pickup:
![]()
…in fact it is Chery….
Beware the fine print... Is this true that this is a Chery and not a Toyota?Patent of LC250 pickup:
…in fact it is Chery….
The Hybrid 48V system uses the Land Cruiser’s established 2.8-litre turbodiesel engine and introduces three principal new components: an electric motor-generator, which replaces the conventional alternator; a 48V lithium-ion battery; and a DC-DC converter which controls the energy flow battery and motor.
The system in no way compromises the Land Cruiser’s ability to operate in extreme conditions and rough terrain. For example, the motor-generator has been positioned high on the engine block so that the vehicle can still wade at low speed through water up to 700 mm deep.
For the US too??
Just to inform, it is indeed a Jetour G700 by Chery. The wagon was just released. So the pickup should be some time later. Not for EU or NA market of course.Beware the fine print... Is this true that this is a Chery and not a Toyota?