Looks like this is the first dynamic drive impression, other KOLs just finished the GX media test drive in Tucson AZ, next stop should be the desert in UT?So, we should be getting some actual first drive impressions soon?
Indeed. My 3rd gen 4Runner gets 18-22mpg on the highway (depending on speed), and the potential for 25+ sounds good. TFL trucks said their non hybrid Tacoma is getting better than claimed mpg too, so it’ll be interesting to see if the same happens with the LC250.22 city / 23 combined / 25 highway is pretty solid. With how heavy the LC is (presumably similar to GX550), hopefully the 4Runner can eke out a few more mpg. I get the highway rating in my current 4Runner most of the time, so 25+mpg while picking up 56hp and almost 200lb-ft of torque.
looks good with blue over the java interior. got me thinking of this over the OT + and saving $15K
...before you get hit with a $10K market adjustment and $5K mandatory dealer protection packagelooks good with blue over the java interior. got me thinking of this over the OT + and saving $15K
obligatory......before you get hit with a $10K market adjustment and $5K mandatory dealer protection package
Love the 1958 because of its spartan interior...if anything, I wish they would offer it with a standalone moonroof optionThe first edition is clearly not a good value. I think the standard grade without the premium package is probably where I would land. I'd honestly go 1958, but that small screen is hard to stomach for $58k. I even like the cloth seats and the blank slate of the rest of the vehicle. If the screen were easily upgraded with aftermarket, I'd be OK with it on the 1958, but I don't have any desire to deal with the bugs that come with aftermarket systems or swapping out to a screen that aesthetically fits better.
Gun to my head having to spend my own money in order of preference:
LC standard, LC + premium, LC 1958, GX 550 Overtrail, GX 550 Overtrail+, LC FE, GX 550 premium, just shoot me for the rest.