Lexus June 2018 Sales Report

Posted by Kevin on July 3rd, 2018

USA

Lexus USA has reported 23,750 total sales for June 2018, a 6.2% daily sales rate decrease over last year — here’s the model-by-model breakdown:

MONTH Year to Date (*DSR)
2018 2017 DSR % CHG* 2018 2017 DSR % CHG*
CT 0 615 -100 4 3,926 -99.9
IS 2,017 2,103 -7.6 11,296 12,328 -9.6
RC 328 499 -36.7 1,749 3,099 -44.3
ES 3,592 4,666 -25.9 19,901 21,800 -9.9
GS 602 646 -10.3 3,688 3,553 2.5
LS 789 300 153.3 4,369 1,855 132.5
LC 161 423 -63 1,016 845 19
LFA 0 0 0 2 0 0
Total Cars
7,489
9,252
-22.1
42,025
47,406
-12.5
NX 4,862 4,597 1.8 28,672 26,023 8.7
RX 8,854 8,408 1.4 50,051 46,737 5.7
GX 2149 1740 18.9 11,670 10,897 5.7
LX 396 398 -4.2 2,582 2,697 -5.5
Total Trucks 16,261
 15,143
 3.4
 92,975
 86,354
 6.3
Total Sales
23,750
24,395
-6.2
135,000
133,760
-0.4

Please note, all percentages are calculated by the Daily Sales Rate (DSR), which takes into account the number of days in the month that dealerships could sell cars. June 2018 had 27 selling days, June 2017 had 26 selling days.

Some highlights from the month:

  • Lexus LUVs posted a 7.4 percent increase, a best-ever June
  • NX Hybrid up 270 percent, the sixth consecutive best-ever month
  • NX combined sales up 5.8 percent in June, a best-ever June and first half
  • RX saw gain of 5.3 percent in June
  • GX increased 23.5 percent, a best-ever June in 13 years
  • LS up 135.5 percent in the first half

“Lexus closed out the first half of the year up led by best-ever LUV sales,” said David Christ, group vice president and general manager, Lexus division. “RX is up seven percent year-to-date and remains the top-selling luxury vehicle in the industry while the NX delivered ten percent year-over-year growth.

“In addition to these great results, we successfully launched our flagship sedan, the all-new LS 500, and the all-new RXL. We’re looking forward to continued success in the third quarter, which will get a boost from our all-new ES sedan that goes on sale in September.”

Sales ReportsUSA
Popular Stories

Sorry. No data so far.

Comments
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
peterharvey
I wouldn't worry too much about the Maserati Quattroporte.
I only brought it up because President Akio races his Maserati at the Nurburgring.
Many years ago, Akio was quoted as saying that he believed that European marques like Maserati have heritage due to their sports background, hence probably why Akio created the no more boring cars formula, with what he describes as wanting more inspired styling and more inspired dynamics.

The 5LS actually has much more in common with the Maserati Quattroporte and Jaguar XJ LWB, than it has in common with the Porsche Panamera.
The Panamera is 1/2 a size smaller than the other three.
Whereas the 5LS, XJ Long Wheelbase & Quattroporte are very similar in wheelbase and length.

Of the latter three, the Quattroporte has the most prominent front mid-engine, with the most cabin length compromize.
The 5LS and Jag XJ LWB have a very similar degree of front mid-engine mount.
Despite the dynamic front mid-engine mount, I think that the 5LS's cabin length and legroom is pretty good for a full size sedan.
The foot room is poor, and maybe the head room and shoulder room is a bit marginal.
The 5LS has only a shallowish 440 L trunk, while the Quattroporte has a 530 L trunk; for comparison, a Camry has a 520 L trunk in metric.
Overall, I'm not too bothered by the 5LS's size, nor the effect of interior size on sales.
If one is worried about interior size, then a conventional front engine RWD with a spacious cabin like the old 4LS is the best route.

I'm actually more worried about the 5LS's styling, as some posters describe as reminding them of a Nissan Infiniti from the rear quarter.

Nevermind the Quattroportes, Jag XJ's nor full size Infiniti Q45's [that was axed a while ago].
Over the past 30 years, one of the great feats of the past four generations of Lexus LS's was their ability on debut to outsell the pants off the Mercedes S Class...
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)
C
I
mikeavelli
The Quattroporte was much worse received than the LS. The styling is awkward. It's been a sales disaster.

Could the new LS styling be too much for people? Absolutley. Lexus knew this going into it and took a huge risk here.
I saw my first one on the road the other day, driving beside it from one intersection to another and I was thoroughly impressed. It had the stance, grandeur, and presence of a flagship sedan and the Manganese Luster color was perfection for LS. This car is a standout and for this price, I don't want to blend in. :)

C