8th Generation Lexus ES Megathread (ES 350h, ES 350e, ES 500e)

CRSKTN

Expert
Messages
2,101
Reactions
3,459
More involvement from Toyota in how Toyota's are created I imagine (it sounds funny). If i'm not mistaken, currently OEMs basically piece together vehicles largely from offerings from suppliers (e.g. door handles, headlight projectors, etc). More stuff than you'd expect in cars like the Camry aren't actually engineered inhouse.

I imagine ODM is more involvement with the design and customization/origination of those components so you get better, more economic outcomes vs making existing things work.

Please someone correct me if i'm wrong.
 

Sulu

Expert
Messages
1,098
Reactions
1,356
More involvement from Toyota in how Toyota's are created I imagine (it sounds funny). If i'm not mistaken, currently OEMs basically piece together vehicles largely from offerings from suppliers (e.g. door handles, headlight projectors, etc). More stuff than you'd expect in cars like the Camry aren't actually engineered inhouse.

I imagine ODM is more involvement with the design and customization/origination of those components so you get better, more economic outcomes vs making existing things work.

Please someone correct me if i'm wrong.
This is an oversimplification. Yes, automakers use common parts across multiple model lines but they don't just piece together their cars from commodity parts picked from large bins on the assembly line floor.

All cars go through a long (years-long) and complicated engineering and styling design process, and only late in that process do the engineers do a "buy or build" decision to determine if they should (and can) buy a part (or subassembly) from a supplier, or build in-house. But even if they do buy from suppliers, the automakers provide specifications to suppliers so that the bought-in products are better-suited for a model line(s) rather than being true parts-bin products.

Of course, this process will depend to a large extent on how vertically-oriented an automaker is. Highly-vertically-oriented companies, like Tesla (and Chinese automakers, as I understand it, but I could be wrong) will build more in-house and buy little from outside suppliers. Western automakers like Ford and GM buy a lot from outside suppliers.

Toyota is somewhere in the middle. They do buy from suppliers but their suppliers, especially in Japan, are largely companies that are in the Toyota "family".

Automakers decide on vertical-orientation in large part to keep quality high and to keep costs low; these were the reasons Tesla has given for being vertically-oriented (but I can see how expensive it can be to have to re-invent the wheel every time Tesla has to design and build a new seat, for example, rather than working with a specialty auto-seat maker). Toyota's (and the Japanese and Korean) culture of in-house / in-family suppliers keeps quality high because the automakers maintain control of their suppliers but the suppliers are also able to sell those parts to other automakers as commodity items (thus lowering costs).

GM and Ford used to have their own families of suppliers but divested sold them off.

I still do not know what "ODM" stands for.
 

ssun30

Expert
Messages
3,551
Reactions
7,796
On the most extreme end is vertical integration. All processes involved in making the product are done in-house. Example is Tesla and BYD.

In between is OEM. The car company is responsible for the design of components which are then manufactured by 3rd party suppliers. Some times the car company owns majority of its Tier 1 suppliers such as TMC and Hyundai.

Then there is ODM. The car brand only does sales and marketing. The actual car is manufactured and designed by an ODM. Example is Toyota BZ3 (manufactured and designed by BYD), Mazda EZ-6 (Chang'an), Polestar 4 (Geely).
 

CRSKTN

Expert
Messages
2,101
Reactions
3,459
parts bin is going too far but some major models from Toyota have a lot of their engineering done outside Japan by firms in places like India. I was surprised to find out.

I think Oem vs Odm is just being pedantic on how involved they are with their suppliers.
 

Ian Schmidt

Moderator
Messages
2,378
Reactions
4,170
In a lot of cases computer modules for things like anti-lock brakes are a stock part from a company like Bosch, but the firmware running on them has customization options that different makers set differently.

The further something is from defining the car, the more likely it's outsourced. Even Tesla uses off-the-shelf pedal assemblies that are also used by at least Mercedes-Benz and Ford. Whereas the powertrain and infotainment are almost never left to anyone else.
 

spwolf

Expert
Messages
3,539
Reactions
3,457
Fisker was ODM - everything was built by suppliers, and outside factories.

Lots of issues messed up the whole brand.

Same suppliers do a lot better job with same technology when integration is done by manufacturers.

Thus the real difference in OEM vs ODM
 
Messages
21
Reactions
14
Yuck with that huge screen. It doesn't fit in that cabin. But to be expected along with the other vehicles that transitioned away from what works.
 

Flagship1

Follower
Messages
495
Reactions
278
wow from slowest adoption of infotainment to fastest.

see if they put their mind to it, lexus can really succeed!

side note does this mean that chiseled next gen es is no longer happening?
 

sl0519

Admirer
Messages
561
Reactions
1,004
Found more:

2025新款es 11.15发布

I'm confused. This is the 2025 ES for China, but why is it different from the US version?
And no, it looks like it is just a model year update, not the rumored major facelift.
 

spwolf

Expert
Messages
3,539
Reactions
3,457
Found more:

2025新款es 11.15发布

I'm confused. This is the 2025 ES for China, but why is it different from the US version?
And no, it looks like it is just a model year update, not the rumored major facelift.

this looks like MMC, which is what we call a facelift, just like 2022.

Also, it is like RZ screen so hvac is integrated into screen physical buttons

1729268186721.png