Giant Cartoon Robots & Japanese Porches Inspired the Lexus UX Crossover Design


With every Lexus model, there are specific ideas and themes that help to shape the overall design. For the new UX crossover, two very different concepts influenced its appearance: an anime robot from the 1980s, and a Japanese-style house verdana called Engawa.

The cartoon robot Mazinger Z was a warning sign in the early design stages of the UX, as chief engineer Chika Kako did not want the crossover to resemble the anime legend — from Cool Hunting:

When Chika Kako, the first woman chief engineer at Lexus, saw designs for the brand’s all-new UX subcompact crossover, she thought of childhood days spent watching anime cartoons with her brother. The SUV’s rear lights reminded her of Mazinger Z, a hulking manga robot on the small screen in the late 70’s and early 80’s. It was a good look for an animated character, she thought, but not on the latest addition to the Lexus line-up.

“The original shape was really unnatural-looking,” Kako tells us via a translator at the vehicle’s global launch in Stockholm earlier this month. Once she told the all-male design team to soften the aggressive exterior, they got the message. “Simply by mentioning Mazinger, they understood what I meant.”

Engawa is essentially a porch that surrounds Japanese homes, extending the living space out into the world — from the Robb Report:

Because of the vehicle’s small size, [chief designer] Suga and Kako wanted to give the interior a greater sense of space. To achieve this, they drew inspiration from Japanese architecture. “We have this concept where you use the outside space as a continuation of your environment,” Suga says.

“Japanese houses are very small, but they have large windows, so the mountains and trees and nature outside are like a picture, an extension of your living space.” Kako adds, “One thing I asked for right away was this line that goes from the dashboard and continues to the outside of the fenders,” she says. The result was not only a sense of openness but also a commanding view of the road, despite the vehicle’s relatively low seating position and center of gravity (no top-heaviness here).

Lexus UX: First Generation
Comments
krew
They're happening right now. I was unable to attend.
ah, too bad... do you know until when are test drives embargoed?
krew
They're happening right now. I was unable to attend.
ah, too bad... do you know until when are test drives embargoed?
krew
They're happening right now. I was unable to attend.
ah, too bad... do you know until when are test drives embargoed?
Cute-small High-rider Hatchback
Cute-small High-rider Hatchback
Cute-small High-rider Hatchback
C
It's growing on me but still not warmed up to the rear especially the fenders and asymmetrically squared off arches and offset/large wheel gap it creates. (Still gives me flashes of the Pontiac Aztec).

Wife likes it more and she's considering downsizing from the RX as her daily. We'll be checking it out at a preview event at my dealership on Sep 10th and hoping it's better in the flesh.
C
It's growing on me but still not warmed up to the rear especially the fenders and asymmetrically squared off arches and offset/large wheel gap it creates. (Still gives me flashes of the Pontiac Aztec).

Wife likes it more and she's considering downsizing from the RX as her daily. We'll be checking it out at a preview event at my dealership on Sep 10th and hoping it's better in the flesh.
C
It's growing on me but still not warmed up to the rear especially the fenders and asymmetrically squared off arches and offset/large wheel gap it creates. (Still gives me flashes of the Pontiac Aztec).

Wife likes it more and she's considering downsizing from the RX as her daily. We'll be checking it out at a preview event at my dealership on Sep 10th and hoping it's better in the flesh.
corradoMR2
It's growing on me but still not warmed up to the rear especially the fenders and asymmetrically squared off arches and offset/large wheel gap it creates. (Still gives me flashes of the Pontiac Aztec).

Wife likes it more and she's considering downsizing from the RX as her daily. We'll be checking it out at a preview event at my dealership on Sep 10th and hoping it's better in the flesh.
let us know your impressions when you see it live.
corradoMR2
It's growing on me but still not warmed up to the rear especially the fenders and asymmetrically squared off arches and offset/large wheel gap it creates. (Still gives me flashes of the Pontiac Aztec).

Wife likes it more and she's considering downsizing from the RX as her daily. We'll be checking it out at a preview event at my dealership on Sep 10th and hoping it's better in the flesh.
let us know your impressions when you see it live.
corradoMR2
It's growing on me but still not warmed up to the rear especially the fenders and asymmetrically squared off arches and offset/large wheel gap it creates. (Still gives me flashes of the Pontiac Aztec).

Wife likes it more and she's considering downsizing from the RX as her daily. We'll be checking it out at a preview event at my dealership on Sep 10th and hoping it's better in the flesh.
let us know your impressions when you see it live.
Honestly it's good designed in and out just the side, for me there's something wrong between the wheels the wheel fender and the car from the side
Honestly it's good designed in and out just the side, for me there's something wrong between the wheels the wheel fender and the car from the side
Honestly it's good designed in and out just the side, for me there's something wrong between the wheels the wheel fender and the car from the side
C
maiaramdan
Honestly it's good designed in and out just the side, for me there's something wrong between the wheels the wheel fender and the car from the side
Agree, however the silver lining is that bigger wheels and a drop can fix this, though then it starts to look more like a hot hatch and less so a crossover.

[​IMG]

C
maiaramdan
Honestly it's good designed in and out just the side, for me there's something wrong between the wheels the wheel fender and the car from the side
Agree, however the silver lining is that bigger wheels and a drop can fix this, though then it starts to look more like a hot hatch and less so a crossover.

[​IMG]

C
maiaramdan
Honestly it's good designed in and out just the side, for me there's something wrong between the wheels the wheel fender and the car from the side
Agree, however the silver lining is that bigger wheels and a drop can fix this, though then it starts to look more like a hot hatch and less so a crossover.

[​IMG]

maiaramdan
Honestly it's good designed in and out just the side, for me there's something wrong between the wheels the wheel fender and the car from the side
[​IMG]

I think you're talking about the one big issue/complaint I have with the UX's exterior styling: the fact that the rear doors are a bit narrow, compounded by the large exterior door handles and, most of all, by how far from the rear edge of the doors the rear door handles are positioned, which makes the rear doors look even stubbier. If the rear door handles were positioned as close to the rear edge of the doors as the front ones are, it would look notably better.

This has become an aesthetic pet peeve of mine, and Lexus is hardly the sole perpetrator. A number of recent Mercedes and Cadillac sedans suffer from the same malady. I imagine there's some engineering/structural reason for it, but those rear door handles positioned so far forward from the rear door edges look like crap.
maiaramdan
Honestly it's good designed in and out just the side, for me there's something wrong between the wheels the wheel fender and the car from the side
[​IMG]

I think you're talking about the one big issue/complaint I have with the UX's exterior styling: the fact that the rear doors are a bit narrow, compounded by the large exterior door handles and, most of all, by how far from the rear edge of the doors the rear door handles are positioned, which makes the rear doors look even stubbier. If the rear door handles were positioned as close to the rear edge of the doors as the front ones are, it would look notably better.

This has become an aesthetic pet peeve of mine, and Lexus is hardly the sole perpetrator. A number of recent Mercedes and Cadillac sedans suffer from the same malady. I imagine there's some engineering/structural reason for it, but those rear door handles positioned so far forward from the rear door edges look like crap.
maiaramdan
Honestly it's good designed in and out just the side, for me there's something wrong between the wheels the wheel fender and the car from the side
[​IMG]

I think you're talking about the one big issue/complaint I have with the UX's exterior styling: the fact that the rear doors are a bit narrow, compounded by the large exterior door handles and, most of all, by how far from the rear edge of the doors the rear door handles are positioned, which makes the rear doors look even stubbier. If the rear door handles were positioned as close to the rear edge of the doors as the front ones are, it would look notably better.

This has become an aesthetic pet peeve of mine, and Lexus is hardly the sole perpetrator. A number of recent Mercedes and Cadillac sedans suffer from the same malady. I imagine there's some engineering/structural reason for it, but those rear door handles positioned so far forward from the rear door edges look like crap.
Funny how so many years later, the CT is still exponentially better looking. UX is a real "miss" in my book... hopefully they do better in the future.
Funny how so many years later, the CT is still exponentially better looking. UX is a real "miss" in my book... hopefully they do better in the future.
Funny how so many years later, the CT is still exponentially better looking. UX is a real "miss" in my book... hopefully they do better in the future.

G