Comments
B
  • B
    BlackDynamiteOnline
  • March 19, 2013
The problem is luxury cars have absolutely nothing to do with "needs". If luxury cars were about fulfilling "needs", Rav4s would be luxury cars. Do you "want" to pay $40k for a 4-banger? If you do, you're probably a poser, a badge -hore...... BD
    F
    • F
      F1orce
    • March 21, 2013
    That's right! And the price difference is so small.. The 2.7L always struggles to move this. I've driven the RX270 The 3.5L is perfect and much smoother, more powerful and effortless. You also achieve better MPG with the 3.5L V6, which is why Toyota dropped the 2.7L from the Sienna minivan, now its only available with that nice 3.5L V6
M
  • M
    MT
  • March 20, 2013
Hmm. Where I live you can buy an S-class with a "4-banger". So there are people that pay 100k€ for that. Not all of them are badge-whores!!!
V
  • V
    Vlad
  • March 20, 2013
Another review I did for Carsguide of the Lexus RX270 is here... http://www.carsguide.com.au/news-and-reviews/car-reviews-road-tests/lexus_rx270_review_2013

V
Top