This video answers the question from one perspective:
Toyota RAV4 2.5l Hybrid (2019): fuel consumption (economy) in city (real-life test)
Below are the numbers over a typical urban commute drive cycle.
Distance travelled: 19 km (11.8 mi)
Avg. Spd: 25 km/h (15.5 mph)
Avg. Fuel Consumption: 4.1 L/100 km (57.4 MPG-US)
% of Time in EV Mode: 79%
Well, so much for the "Toyota is against electrification" theory.
While this video depicts a typical commute scenario commonly found in densely urbanized Europe/Japan/China, it is worth noting even in the U.S. this kind of commute is common for people living in heavily congested cities (where average speed can be even lower).
Now according to Toyota's own papers, for urban driving ~90% of the energy comes from petrol, while the rest 10% comes from regen. That's not a very high electrification ratio, but the petrol is used much more efficiently. In fact, even for highway cruising (where hybrid advantage diminishes), the RAV4 Hybrid still manages to match the fuel economy of diesels.
Toyota RAV4 2.5l Hybrid 2019 - fuel consumption vs. other SUVs
The new RAV4 Hybrid has 60% better fuel economy than last-gen in city, and over 25% better on highways. The last-gen is actually barely more efficient than a downsized turbo gasoline car with similar power and weight.
In the same video the numbers for the Hyundai Tucson 2.0 CRDi 48V is also shown. The short conclusion is that mild hybrids have very limited gains in city driving, and close to zero benefit for highway driving (if not negative impact due to extra weight from the mild hybrid system).
Toyota RAV4 2.5l Hybrid (2019): fuel consumption (economy) in city (real-life test)
Below are the numbers over a typical urban commute drive cycle.
Distance travelled: 19 km (11.8 mi)
Avg. Spd: 25 km/h (15.5 mph)
Avg. Fuel Consumption: 4.1 L/100 km (57.4 MPG-US)
% of Time in EV Mode: 79%
Well, so much for the "Toyota is against electrification" theory.
While this video depicts a typical commute scenario commonly found in densely urbanized Europe/Japan/China, it is worth noting even in the U.S. this kind of commute is common for people living in heavily congested cities (where average speed can be even lower).
Now according to Toyota's own papers, for urban driving ~90% of the energy comes from petrol, while the rest 10% comes from regen. That's not a very high electrification ratio, but the petrol is used much more efficiently. In fact, even for highway cruising (where hybrid advantage diminishes), the RAV4 Hybrid still manages to match the fuel economy of diesels.
Toyota RAV4 2.5l Hybrid 2019 - fuel consumption vs. other SUVs
The new RAV4 Hybrid has 60% better fuel economy than last-gen in city, and over 25% better on highways. The last-gen is actually barely more efficient than a downsized turbo gasoline car with similar power and weight.
In the same video the numbers for the Hyundai Tucson 2.0 CRDi 48V is also shown. The short conclusion is that mild hybrids have very limited gains in city driving, and close to zero benefit for highway driving (if not negative impact due to extra weight from the mild hybrid system).
Last edited:
