CAR Magazine Comparison: Lexus RC F Wins Over BMW M4 & Ford Mustang

meth.ix

Admirer
Messages
782
Reaction score
806
First time I've seen a magazine review the RC F with the carbon package.
 

mikeavelli

Connoisseur
Staff member
Moderator
Messages
4,013
Reaction score
7,705
Its a really good read for those that haven't read it in full.
 

maiaramdan

Admirer
Messages
829
Reaction score
596
honestly a lot of controversy regarding the RC-F
i donno maybe the frankenstein structure of 3 different chassis harm it a lot
honestly hope they fixed all the down falls by the next generation
 

IS-SV

Expert
Premium Member
Messages
1,666
Reaction score
1,261
Excellent and thorough article, far better than superficial short test drive reviews. 2 of my favorites floated to the top here (RC-F, 'Stang GT and C-class coupe all being considered for my next weekend vehicle).
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
3,479
Reaction score
2,049
Good article, but it makes you wonder, though, where the Camaro SS would have ranked, given its excellent Cadillac ATS-V-sourced chassis.
 

Rob Grieveson

Follower
Messages
155
Reaction score
130
Well done to Lexus! Nice to be top for a change and no excuse, this car was designed to be a winner and it therefore must be - Lexus knew what they had to take on and they have and good on them.
 

Axel

Fan
Messages
108
Reaction score
88
Now I wish the enthusiasts would stop calling for turbos on lexus. RCF and GSF are the best cars out there because of this N/A V8. Infact I would not mind if lexus made this engine more efficient and keep it for the next gen F. I see no point in accelerating to 60 faster then the RCF does for the F brand
 

IS-SV

Expert
Premium Member
Messages
1,666
Reaction score
1,261
Note: GM doesn't do a RHD version of Camaro, like Ford does w/Mustang (as it relates to UK article/topic here).
 
Last edited:

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
3,479
Reaction score
2,049
Note: GM doesn't do a RHD version of Camaro, like Ford does w/Mustang (as it relates to UK article/topic here).
Agreed, but that was part of my point....one can only wonder how the Camaro SS would have fared if they DID. That ATS-V chassis is getting quite a reputation.

Back to the article, I have to agree with a couple of the previous posters that, for some things, at least, there's no replacement for displacement. Turbos and superchargers, of course, can add HP/torque to small-displacement engines, but introduce complexity and a number of (potential) problems and issues as well.
 
Top