LDeleuran
Fan
- Messages
- 99
- Reactions
- 162
I am tinkering with the idea of getting an LC500. Unfortunately the slope down to my garage is rather steep, and I do not want to park the car outside.
When my CT200h drives down the driveway, its 20cm front clearance is reduced to 6cm where it is closest to the ground. The difference between the CT and LC is supposedly +4.0cm of front overhang and -6.7cm ride height.
Basic geometry tells me that this will not work. However. I have measured the ride height of my CT at the front lip as being 20cm, where the spec sheet says 14cm of ride height. If the LC measures 15cm or taller at the front lip (or 'splitter'), then it should be possible to get one without having to rent another garage.
There is also another thing that bothers me. When I went to the dealership I was recommended against getting an LC by the salesperson. I am looking for a cruiser, and the GSF is no longer available here, so I though the LC would have been the ideal match. Am I wrong about this?
When my CT200h drives down the driveway, its 20cm front clearance is reduced to 6cm where it is closest to the ground. The difference between the CT and LC is supposedly +4.0cm of front overhang and -6.7cm ride height.
Basic geometry tells me that this will not work. However. I have measured the ride height of my CT at the front lip as being 20cm, where the spec sheet says 14cm of ride height. If the LC measures 15cm or taller at the front lip (or 'splitter'), then it should be possible to get one without having to rent another garage.
There is also another thing that bothers me. When I went to the dealership I was recommended against getting an LC by the salesperson. I am looking for a cruiser, and the GSF is no longer available here, so I though the LC would have been the ideal match. Am I wrong about this?