GM hopes to cash in on VW's mistakes with Chevy Cruze Diesel

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,155
Reactions
2,675
Mods.....at first, I wasn't sure whether to start a new thread for this or just tack it onto the existing (and LONG) thread on the VW diesel scandal. But, since it technically involves a different vehicle and manufacturer, I felt a new thread would be appropriate.

Personally, I think it looks very interesting. I'm going to try and do at least a test-drive, if not a full-review.

http://www.autonews.com/article/20170220/OEM06/302209945/how-chevy-coaxed-cruze-diesel-to-52-mpg

How Chevy coaxed Cruze diesel to 52 mpg
February 20, 2017 @ 12:01 am
Richard Truett
19

Shares
AR-302209945.jpg

2017 Chevrolet Cruze dieselSend us a Letter
Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.
Related Stories
Ingredients to 50-plus mph
To earn the EPA's rare 50-plus highway fuel economy rating for the 2018 Cruze diesel sedan, Chevrolet engineers didn't just drop a fuel-efficient engine and transmission into the Cruze and call it done.

"There is no one silver bullet," says Craig Weddle, Cruze chief engineer. "There were a lot of little things we had to do to make it all add up."

It was a significant technical feat.

Last week when the EPA confirmed the Cruze diesel's 52-mpg highway fuel economy rating through its own testing at the agency's Ann Arbor, Mich., labs, the Cruze became one of only 4 non-hybrid cars to punch through the 50 mpg highway barrier since 1990.

And after the EPA revised its fuel economy test procedures in 2008 to better reflect real-world fuel economy, only one non-hybrid car since 1990 -- the Geo Metro XFi, also sold by Chevrolet -- has retained a 50-plus mpg rating. (The EPA has revoked certification and mileage ratings for all VW diesels affected by the emissions cheating scandal).

"Fuel economy is the reason for purchase, and we were looking for a wow factor," said Dan Nicholson, GM's vice president of Global Propulsion Systems.

The Cruze's results took a total General Motors team effort that drew in aerodynamicists, electricians, powertrain engineers, lightweighting specialists, friction gurus, calibration engineers and others.

The Cruze diesel, on the way to dealers now, even has a chief energy engineer, Eric VanDommelen, whose goal was to make sure every pound-foot of torque sent to the wheels delivered maximum efficiency and that few, if any, electrons were wasted.

Much of the technology used to boost the car's fuel economy, such as the smooth underbody, low-drag brakes and active grille shutters, came straight from hybrid cars.

GM will have its challenges marketing the fuel-sipping diesel. The car is part of a big push at GM to attract Volkswagen buyers leaving the brand in the wake of the diesel emissions cheating scandal there. That won't be easy. Gasoline is cheap and consumers are deserting cars for SUVs, crossovers and trucks. Diesel engines, thanks to VW's controversy, now have image issues.

It's also not a given that VW buyers will consider switching to Chevrolet.

Nicholson said in August that GM would be going after VW's diesel faithful, who once accounted for about 20 percent of the German brand's U.S. sales. A diesel version of the Equinox crossover is also on the way, and by the end of 2018, GM will offer 10 diesel models in North America. Nicholson said last week diesel vehicles represent a growth opportunity for Chevrolet.

But none of that mattered to the engineers who tuned and tweaked and prodded the Cruze diesel until it rolled over the 50-mpg goal line.

Not the '90s

Unlike the cramped, stripped-down '90s-era cars that got 50 mpg or close to it, the Cruze diesel sedan is smooth, quiet, comfortable and fully equipped with safety features and electronic gear.

"Certainly having a number that started with 5 was enticing, but we didn't sacrifice the rest of the car to get that," Weddle says. He added there was no pressure from upper management to hit 50 mpg.

"It was really about producing a great car with fuel economy that we thought would excite our expected diesel customer base," he said.

AutoPacific analyst Dave Sullivan calls the 52-mpg highway fuel economy rating for the Cruze diesel impressive. He notes engineers struggle for every 10th of a mile fuel economy gain and that the new Cruze diesel not only beats the old model by 6 mpg, but it bests the highway rating of the 2015 Cruze Eco, a gasoline-powered model built for high fuel economy, by a full 10 mpg.

"Other cars need two powertrains to hit anything in the 50 mpg range -- I'm talking about hybrids," says Sullivan. "Now you can get hybridlike fuel economy without the stigma of being seen in an oddly styled hybrid."
The exclusive 50-mpg club

Until the Cruze earned its 52-mpg highway rating, only three non-hybrid cars had earned 50 or better since1990. 2 were later revised out of the club.Shown below (clockwise): The Geo Metro XFi, Honda Civic CRF HF and the VW Jetta Wagon


3-GEOHONDAVWsamesize.jpg
2018 Chevrolet Cruze diesel: 30 mpg city, 52 highway, 37 combined (6-speed manual)
1990-94 Geo Metro XFi (5-speed manual)
Original:
53 city, 58 highway, 55 combined
Revised: 43 city, 52 highway, 47 combined1990 Honda Civic CRX HF (5-speed manual)
Original:
49 city, 52 highway, 50 combined
Revised: 40 city, 47 highway, 43 combined2002-03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon diesel
Original:
42 city, 50 highway, 45 combined
Revised: 35 city, 45 highway, 39 combinedNotes: The EPA revised its fuel economy rating method in 2008 and published new ratings for vehicles alongside the old ones. Also, the EPA has removed certification from VW diesels from the 2009 to the 2015 model years.Source: EPA Fuel Economy Guide
The biggest parts of the Cruze's 52-mpg highway rating came from three areas: weight reduction, aerodynamics and the powertrain.

To start with, the current-generation Cruze, introduced last year, weighs about 250 pounds less than the 2015 version, mostly because of increased use of lightweight high-strength steel in the body, and aluminum in the suspension components.

"We put the mass where it matters to get the stiffness in the structure, but thinned it out anywhere where it is not absolutely needed," Weddle says.

Engineers also booked a 33-pound weight reduction under the hood. The old car's 2.0-liter diesel engine had a cast-iron block and weighed 368 pounds installed. The 2018 diesel's 1.6-liter engine has an aluminum block with cast iron liners and weighs 335 pounds.

Another key piece of the Cruze's fuel economy puzzle is its manual transmission, which requires less energy from the engine to power the wheels than the available nine-speed automatic. The six-speed manual also weighs less than the automatic.

Slippery shape

Improved aerodynamics were another important part of the equation. Many of the aerodynamic tweaks GM engineers made to the car carry over from the gasoline version.

In front of each tire, for example, a black plastic deflector pushes air away from the wheels. The Cruze also has active grille shutters, which adjust to the engine's cooling needs. When the shutters are closed, the aerodynamic efficiency is improved as air is routed over, under or around the car. Headlights, taillights, door handles and exterior mirrors saw plenty of wind tunnel time.
H5-302209945.jpg&MaxW=450

Engine testing involved 50 cars over more than 1 million miles.

The 2018 Cruze diesel's aerodynamic drag coefficient -- a measurement that quantifies aerodynamic efficiency -- is 0.28, down from the 0.30 of the 2015 Cruze diesel. The lower the number, the less energy it takes to push the car through the air.

VanDommelen, Cruze's chief energy engineer, said other tweaks, including using low-friction bearings in the drivetrain and wheels, tires that have lower rolling resistance than those used on the 1st generation Volt, and managing energy usage also helped attain the 52-mpg rating.

Even though GM's internal testing showed the Cruze well over 50 mpg on the highway, the champagne corks stayed in the bottles, VanDommelen said, until the EPA confirmed it.

"We had some hopes, and we're looking forward to hitting that goal. But I didn't want to really believe it until I saw it from the EPA. Once they confirmed it, we felt pretty good," he said.

Nicholson, GM's powertrain boss, said engineers weren't sure the Cruze would attain the 50-plus rating until late last year, near the end of the car's development cycle. "We were careful not to put pressure on the team,"he said, "We wanted them to focus only on delivering the best car for the customer."

VW diesel owners had routinely beaten the EPA label numbers in their actual driving. And Sullivan thinks Cruze diesel drivers can get even higher than the 52 mpg highway rating.

"Most consumers have been able to beat the EPA numbers with small displacement diesels," Sullivan says. "If Cruze owners can beat the EPA number, it might make GM the new diesel leader in a market that has been leveled to nothing."
You can reach Richard Truett at rtruett@crain.com
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,155
Reactions
2,675
No one is going to buy it in the USA...

It will certainly have the non-VW diesel small-car market to itself here in the U.S......so, how much it sells may be dependent on the long-term effect (if any) of the VW scandal. I myself am not one of those who necessarily believes that just because something happens to carmaker A, it will necessarily happen to carmaker B......particularly if B is not at fault.
 

IS-SV

Premium Member
Messages
1,886
Reactions
1,350
Agreed, a slow seller in US. High purchase price, high diesel fuel prices, inconvenient and stinking diesel fueling stations/pumps are all factors.
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,155
Reactions
2,675
Agreed, a slow seller in US. High purchase price, high diesel fuel prices, inconvenient and stinking diesel fueling stations/pumps are all factors.

....and gasoline doesn't stink? My nose says otherwise. You have a point, though, on the other factors. Even outside of California, modern low-sulfur diesel fuel is (currently) priced well above 87 octane (even above 93-octane Premium in some cases), and not every station carries it.
 

IS-SV

Premium Member
Messages
1,886
Reactions
1,350
....and gasoline doesn't stink? My nose says otherwise. You have a point, though, on the other factors. Even outside of California, modern low-sulfur diesel fuel is (currently) priced well above 87 octane (even above 93-octane Premium in some cases), and not every station carries it.

The difference is gasoline evaporates more quickly, leaving less of a stink. Diesel leaves a sticky and more smelly mess that lingers much long. Common knowledge, just look at the stinky greasy mess around nearly all diesel pumps.
 
Last edited:

CIF

Premium Member
Messages
1,675
Reactions
1,825
An aluminum block diesel engine? I'm not very familiar with diesel engines, but don't diesel engines usually use an iron block for durability reasons? I'm not sure what long-term reliability would be like on an aluminum block diesel. Or is my knowledge simply out of date? Are most passenger car diesels using aluminum blocks nowadays? I know on heavy duty trucks, diesel engines are using various iron blocks.
 

mmcartalk

Expert
Messages
4,155
Reactions
2,675
An aluminum block diesel engine? I'm not very familiar with diesel engines, but don't diesel engines usually use an iron block for durability reasons? I'm not sure what long-term reliability would be like on an aluminum block diesel. Or is my knowledge simply out of date? Are most passenger car diesels using aluminum blocks nowadays? I know on heavy duty trucks, diesel engines are using various iron blocks.


That's part of my concern, too. Diesel engines, from their enormous 20:1 compression-ratios, produce a lot heat and pressure on the blocks, inside the cylinders (that's what ignites the air/fuel mixtures without a spark, except on a cold-start where a glow plug is required). Traditionally, iron blocks have been the best way to handle that pressure, but, of course, aluminum alloys have been getting better all the time. However, given some of GM's past disasters in developing new engine technology (Chevy Vega, Olds 5.7L V8 diesel, Cadillac V-8-6-4, and others).........I'd be leery of this one, at least at first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CIF