Video: The 2018 Lexus LS 500 from the Driver’s Seat

Gecko, some good points. While I'm personally not in the market for any sedan at all, I just strongly believe it would have been nice for the LS to have had a competitive counter to Benz features like Magic Body Control and Crosswind Stabilization. Do these matter to the average buyer? Maybe, maybe not. However I will strongly argue the prestige luxury sedan segment is not filled with average buyers. I think by its very nature, this market is filled with extraordinary buyers. Also by its very nature, this market isn't simply about "need to have" features. Much of the market is about "want to have" and "nice to have" features.

Personally though, if I was in the market for a prestige product like an LS or LX, then features with the functionality of Magic Body Control and Crosswind Stabilization would definitely be things I would want to have. Personally I would want these features far more than all the autonomous nanny systems that all automakers are shoving into their vehicles.

krew

I don't believe that a massive press release is the proper way to tell these stories any more. Instead, we're going to keep seeing smaller articles that highlight specific elements of the LS -- here are three examples:

http://newsroom.lexus.eu/2018-lexus...ip-stories-chapter-1-origami-fabric-pleating/

http://newsroom.lexus.eu/2018-lexus-ls-takumi-craftsmanship-stories-chapter-2-kiriko-glasswork/

http://newsroom.lexus.eu/2018-lexus-ls-takumi-craftsmanship-stories-chapter-3-art-wood/

All three of these "Takumi Craftsmanship Stories" have the kind of detail you're looking for.

That's fair, and again I totally understand that. I'm still waiting though for a response from Lexus regarding "unheard of" targets set for the 5LS. The fabric pleating, kiriko glass, and art wood I don't feel are adequate enough answers for "unheard of" targets. So far, that's been a bold and nebulous claim. I don't have a problem with the claim; I have a problem with lack of answers and information for that claim. If Lexus doesn't plan to substantively answer that claim in any form, be it press release, video, stories, etc. I would suggest then that they remove it from their press release :).

The RWD S550 previously started at $94,999, I believe, which is why I said it's a $5k cut. I may be mis-remembering though.

They could probably sell a ton of an $85k F-Sport with an upgraded engine. The question of where they'll find that engine then comes up though: the LC's 2UR has the horses for the part, but it's down significantly on torque from the TTV6.

The RWD S550 previously started at $94,999, I believe, which is why I said it's a $5k cut. I may be mis-remembering though.

They could probably sell a ton of an $85k F-Sport with an upgraded engine. The question of where they'll find that engine then comes up though: the LC's 2UR has the horses for the part, but it's down significantly on torque from the TTV6.

The RWD S550 previously started at $94,999, I believe, which is why I said it's a $5k cut. I may be mis-remembering though.

They could probably sell a ton of an $85k F-Sport with an upgraded engine. The question of where they'll find that engine then comes up though: the LC's 2UR has the horses for the part, but it's down significantly on torque from the TTV6.

The RWD S550 previously started at $94,999, I believe, which is why I said it's a $5k cut. I may be mis-remembering though.

They could probably sell a ton of an $85k F-Sport with an upgraded engine. The question of where they'll find that engine then comes up though: the LC's 2UR has the horses for the part, but it's down significantly on torque from the TTV6.

Ian Schmidt

They could probably sell a ton of an $85k F-Sport with an upgraded engine. The question of where they'll find that engine then comes up though: the LC's 2UR has the horses for the part, but it's down significantly on torque from the TTV6.

Agree - and I've always said that in the LS, the 3.5L TT V6 is the superior engine compared to the 5.0L V8. This car needs torque for smooth, seamless operation... and that's not a strong point for the 2UR-GSE. Revving to 5-6k RPM for power in a car like this isn't exactly kosher.

I have to think a detuned 4.0L TT V8 would be a pretty simple tune apart from whatever is used for the LS F and LC F. Mercedes and others have multiple tunes of their 4.0L TT V8s... Lexus could do the same.

They'll need something like this for the LX, anyway.

Ian Schmidt

They could probably sell a ton of an $85k F-Sport with an upgraded engine. The question of where they'll find that engine then comes up though: the LC's 2UR has the horses for the part, but it's down significantly on torque from the TTV6.

Agree - and I've always said that in the LS, the 3.5L TT V6 is the superior engine compared to the 5.0L V8. This car needs torque for smooth, seamless operation... and that's not a strong point for the 2UR-GSE. Revving to 5-6k RPM for power in a car like this isn't exactly kosher.

I have to think a detuned 4.0L TT V8 would be a pretty simple tune apart from whatever is used for the LS F and LC F. Mercedes and others have multiple tunes of their 4.0L TT V8s... Lexus could do the same.

They'll need something like this for the LX, anyway.

Ian Schmidt

They could probably sell a ton of an $85k F-Sport with an upgraded engine. The question of where they'll find that engine then comes up though: the LC's 2UR has the horses for the part, but it's down significantly on torque from the TTV6.

Agree - and I've always said that in the LS, the 3.5L TT V6 is the superior engine compared to the 5.0L V8. This car needs torque for smooth, seamless operation... and that's not a strong point for the 2UR-GSE. Revving to 5-6k RPM for power in a car like this isn't exactly kosher.

I have to think a detuned 4.0L TT V8 would be a pretty simple tune apart from whatever is used for the LS F and LC F. Mercedes and others have multiple tunes of their 4.0L TT V8s... Lexus could do the same.

They'll need something like this for the LX, anyway.

Ian Schmidt

They could probably sell a ton of an $85k F-Sport with an upgraded engine. The question of where they'll find that engine then comes up though: the LC's 2UR has the horses for the part, but it's down significantly on torque from the TTV6.

Agree - and I've always said that in the LS, the 3.5L TT V6 is the superior engine compared to the 5.0L V8. This car needs torque for smooth, seamless operation... and that's not a strong point for the 2UR-GSE. Revving to 5-6k RPM for power in a car like this isn't exactly kosher.

I have to think a detuned 4.0L TT V8 would be a pretty simple tune apart from whatever is used for the LS F and LC F. Mercedes and others have multiple tunes of their 4.0L TT V8s... Lexus could do the same.

They'll need something like this for the LX, anyway.

Gecko

I have to think a detuned 4.0L TT V8 would be a pretty simple tune apart from whatever is used for the LS F and LC F. Mercedes and others have multiple tunes of their 4.0L TT V8s... Lexus could do the same.

View attachment 2611

Gecko

I have to think a detuned 4.0L TT V8 would be a pretty simple tune apart from whatever is used for the LS F and LC F. Mercedes and others have multiple tunes of their 4.0L TT V8s... Lexus could do the same.

View attachment 2611

Gecko

I have to think a detuned 4.0L TT V8 would be a pretty simple tune apart from whatever is used for the LS F and LC F. Mercedes and others have multiple tunes of their 4.0L TT V8s... Lexus could do the same.

View attachment 2611

Gecko

I have to think a detuned 4.0L TT V8 would be a pretty simple tune apart from whatever is used for the LS F and LC F. Mercedes and others have multiple tunes of their 4.0L TT V8s... Lexus could do the same.

View attachment 2611

Gecko

@Ian Schmidt posted this in the Lexus/Genesis thread originally and as I kept typing my reply, I realized that it probably belonged more here, so here are some random thoughts:



I didn't see this until you mentioned it... 362hp S450 now starts at $89,900. Didn't the S550 start at like $98k before? New S560 starts at $103k and includes AWD as standard.

Also, BMW seems to be only offering one wheelbase on the 7 series now. Did anyone notice that?

I think LS 500 vs. S450 is a no brainer - there's no way I'd consider the S over the LS at that price point, and the Lexus starts $15k lower. LS 500 vs S560 is a $28k question and while some will say "People shopping in this price bracket don't care about value," that price difference is roughly 1/3 to 1/4 of the value of the car. We're not talking about a few thousand dollars of difference. That's significant (IMO).

I do look forward to someone doing a comparo that's something like:

LS 500 vs. 740i vs S450 vs A8 3.0T and also LS 500 vs 750i vs S560 vs A8 4.0T

History has proven that it's very easy for journalists to drive something like a S560 and 750i back to back with an LS 500 and disregard the $25-30k price difference when it's not their money and you're driving the cars for 2-3 days trying to figure out which one you like most. This is when things like being the fastest, most fun to drive, or highest tech really shine... and the "price" factor isn't really considered until the conclusion is being written and they add "value" to the end of the argument. Then the headlines will become that LS isn't as good and it's not worth your time (if you're a buyer). Is that really the case in the real world, day to day? I highly doubt it.

Let's be honest - Mercedes offers a lot of tech in the S Class that it doesn't seem like LS has countered or included with the LS... but I'm not sure those things really make that much of a difference to the average shopper. GPS-controlled suspension that can make adjustments based on the road ahead? Very cool, but is that a selling feature that would get you to fork over $25k more? For me, no. For a journalist with no skin in the game, that's a pretty cool feature and gives you something neat to hype up in reviews. Day to day for the average shopper, I think 5LS is just as much car as the S560 up to probably 8/10ths. If you're extremely tech savvy and HAVE to have the latest and greatest, or you really desire a V8, then in that last 2/10ths, LS falls behind and is not the right car for you. It's that last 2/10ths that journalists will focus on without worrying about the price difference or making the payment with your own checkbook - or what the car will be worth in 2, 3, 4, 5 years when you're ready to get rid of it. Lexus buyers are much more conscious of these things, which will be good for the brand.

I think of this segment in three tiers:
Tier 1: Base V6 engines
Tier 2: V8 engines
Tier 3: High performance variants like AMG, R, P100D, etc.

The competitive set breaks out as follows:
Model S 75D: $74,500
LS 500: $75,000
A8 L 3.0T: $82,300 (TBD on pricing for the new model)
740i: $83,000
XJ L 3.0: $84,500
Panamera: $85,000
Panamera 4: $89,500
S450: $89,900
A8 4.0T: $92,000 (TBD on pricing for the new model)
S450 4Matic: $92,900
Model S 100D: $94,000
750i: $96,000
Panamera 4 Executive: $96,300
XJ L 5.0: $96,300
750i X Drive: $99,400
S 560 4Matic: $102,900
Panamera 4S: $103,000
Panamera 4S Executive: $113,900


I've made the comments that 1) I think Lexus made the right call with the new base 3.5L TT V6 and 2) that I think there should be a V8, non-F option. When you look at the prices and models above, I really believe that Lexus had an opening around $85-90k for an LS "550" with around 500 horsepower V8. To my earlier point, LS 500 will be more than enough engine for 90% of buyers, but there is a lot of competition at the middle of this segment as well, with S560, 750i, Panamera, Model S, XJ - models that are more emotional and driver-focused with bigger engines and more output. I know the argument can be made that the volume here is small and the juice isn't worth the squeeze, but I believe it would have looked good for Lexus to have a horse in this race. As it stands now, Lexus is straddling tiers 1 and 2 with LS 500 and I think it would have been great for them to solidly offer something in both, short of LS F.

While it's not the magazine racer or Youtube commenter who often buys cars in this class, once you start talking about Panamera (who Lexus execs have referenced as a consideration in LS redesign), XJ L 5.0 and others, it's just unfortunate that the LS isn't really mentioned in that company because the LS 500 lacks the muscle to go that extra 2/10ths. Perhaps when the LS F shows up, nobody will even care that there's no "middle" V8 car. Time will tell.

Great post...I agree a V-8 option should be AN OPTION. Being in Miami which is a city that just drowns itself in luxury cars the S-class is supreme by far. You then see a 7 series/LS and then a A8. But they pale in comparison to how many S-classes are around. And when the initial rush died off, you can lease a S-class for a bit over $1,000 which is considered attractive and will help keep it dominating.

Gecko

@Ian Schmidt posted this in the Lexus/Genesis thread originally and as I kept typing my reply, I realized that it probably belonged more here, so here are some random thoughts:



I didn't see this until you mentioned it... 362hp S450 now starts at $89,900. Didn't the S550 start at like $98k before? New S560 starts at $103k and includes AWD as standard.

Also, BMW seems to be only offering one wheelbase on the 7 series now. Did anyone notice that?

I think LS 500 vs. S450 is a no brainer - there's no way I'd consider the S over the LS at that price point, and the Lexus starts $15k lower. LS 500 vs S560 is a $28k question and while some will say "People shopping in this price bracket don't care about value," that price difference is roughly 1/3 to 1/4 of the value of the car. We're not talking about a few thousand dollars of difference. That's significant (IMO).

I do look forward to someone doing a comparo that's something like:

LS 500 vs. 740i vs S450 vs A8 3.0T and also LS 500 vs 750i vs S560 vs A8 4.0T

History has proven that it's very easy for journalists to drive something like a S560 and 750i back to back with an LS 500 and disregard the $25-30k price difference when it's not their money and you're driving the cars for 2-3 days trying to figure out which one you like most. This is when things like being the fastest, most fun to drive, or highest tech really shine... and the "price" factor isn't really considered until the conclusion is being written and they add "value" to the end of the argument. Then the headlines will become that LS isn't as good and it's not worth your time (if you're a buyer). Is that really the case in the real world, day to day? I highly doubt it.

Let's be honest - Mercedes offers a lot of tech in the S Class that it doesn't seem like LS has countered or included with the LS... but I'm not sure those things really make that much of a difference to the average shopper. GPS-controlled suspension that can make adjustments based on the road ahead? Very cool, but is that a selling feature that would get you to fork over $25k more? For me, no. For a journalist with no skin in the game, that's a pretty cool feature and gives you something neat to hype up in reviews. Day to day for the average shopper, I think 5LS is just as much car as the S560 up to probably 8/10ths. If you're extremely tech savvy and HAVE to have the latest and greatest, or you really desire a V8, then in that last 2/10ths, LS falls behind and is not the right car for you. It's that last 2/10ths that journalists will focus on without worrying about the price difference or making the payment with your own checkbook - or what the car will be worth in 2, 3, 4, 5 years when you're ready to get rid of it. Lexus buyers are much more conscious of these things, which will be good for the brand.

I think of this segment in three tiers:
Tier 1: Base V6 engines
Tier 2: V8 engines
Tier 3: High performance variants like AMG, R, P100D, etc.

The competitive set breaks out as follows:
Model S 75D: $74,500
LS 500: $75,000
A8 L 3.0T: $82,300 (TBD on pricing for the new model)
740i: $83,000
XJ L 3.0: $84,500
Panamera: $85,000
Panamera 4: $89,500
S450: $89,900
A8 4.0T: $92,000 (TBD on pricing for the new model)
S450 4Matic: $92,900
Model S 100D: $94,000
750i: $96,000
Panamera 4 Executive: $96,300
XJ L 5.0: $96,300
750i X Drive: $99,400
S 560 4Matic: $102,900
Panamera 4S: $103,000
Panamera 4S Executive: $113,900


I've made the comments that 1) I think Lexus made the right call with the new base 3.5L TT V6 and 2) that I think there should be a V8, non-F option. When you look at the prices and models above, I really believe that Lexus had an opening around $85-90k for an LS "550" with around 500 horsepower V8. To my earlier point, LS 500 will be more than enough engine for 90% of buyers, but there is a lot of competition at the middle of this segment as well, with S560, 750i, Panamera, Model S, XJ - models that are more emotional and driver-focused with bigger engines and more output. I know the argument can be made that the volume here is small and the juice isn't worth the squeeze, but I believe it would have looked good for Lexus to have a horse in this race. As it stands now, Lexus is straddling tiers 1 and 2 with LS 500 and I think it would have been great for them to solidly offer something in both, short of LS F.

While it's not the magazine racer or Youtube commenter who often buys cars in this class, once you start talking about Panamera (who Lexus execs have referenced as a consideration in LS redesign), XJ L 5.0 and others, it's just unfortunate that the LS isn't really mentioned in that company because the LS 500 lacks the muscle to go that extra 2/10ths. Perhaps when the LS F shows up, nobody will even care that there's no "middle" V8 car. Time will tell.

Great post...I agree a V-8 option should be AN OPTION. Being in Miami which is a city that just drowns itself in luxury cars the S-class is supreme by far. You then see a 7 series/LS and then a A8. But they pale in comparison to how many S-classes are around. And when the initial rush died off, you can lease a S-class for a bit over $1,000 which is considered attractive and will help keep it dominating.

Gecko

@Ian Schmidt posted this in the Lexus/Genesis thread originally and as I kept typing my reply, I realized that it probably belonged more here, so here are some random thoughts:



I didn't see this until you mentioned it... 362hp S450 now starts at $89,900. Didn't the S550 start at like $98k before? New S560 starts at $103k and includes AWD as standard.

Also, BMW seems to be only offering one wheelbase on the 7 series now. Did anyone notice that?

I think LS 500 vs. S450 is a no brainer - there's no way I'd consider the S over the LS at that price point, and the Lexus starts $15k lower. LS 500 vs S560 is a $28k question and while some will say "People shopping in this price bracket don't care about value," that price difference is roughly 1/3 to 1/4 of the value of the car. We're not talking about a few thousand dollars of difference. That's significant (IMO).

I do look forward to someone doing a comparo that's something like:

LS 500 vs. 740i vs S450 vs A8 3.0T and also LS 500 vs 750i vs S560 vs A8 4.0T

History has proven that it's very easy for journalists to drive something like a S560 and 750i back to back with an LS 500 and disregard the $25-30k price difference when it's not their money and you're driving the cars for 2-3 days trying to figure out which one you like most. This is when things like being the fastest, most fun to drive, or highest tech really shine... and the "price" factor isn't really considered until the conclusion is being written and they add "value" to the end of the argument. Then the headlines will become that LS isn't as good and it's not worth your time (if you're a buyer). Is that really the case in the real world, day to day? I highly doubt it.

Let's be honest - Mercedes offers a lot of tech in the S Class that it doesn't seem like LS has countered or included with the LS... but I'm not sure those things really make that much of a difference to the average shopper. GPS-controlled suspension that can make adjustments based on the road ahead? Very cool, but is that a selling feature that would get you to fork over $25k more? For me, no. For a journalist with no skin in the game, that's a pretty cool feature and gives you something neat to hype up in reviews. Day to day for the average shopper, I think 5LS is just as much car as the S560 up to probably 8/10ths. If you're extremely tech savvy and HAVE to have the latest and greatest, or you really desire a V8, then in that last 2/10ths, LS falls behind and is not the right car for you. It's that last 2/10ths that journalists will focus on without worrying about the price difference or making the payment with your own checkbook - or what the car will be worth in 2, 3, 4, 5 years when you're ready to get rid of it. Lexus buyers are much more conscious of these things, which will be good for the brand.

I think of this segment in three tiers:
Tier 1: Base V6 engines
Tier 2: V8 engines
Tier 3: High performance variants like AMG, R, P100D, etc.

The competitive set breaks out as follows:
Model S 75D: $74,500
LS 500: $75,000
A8 L 3.0T: $82,300 (TBD on pricing for the new model)
740i: $83,000
XJ L 3.0: $84,500
Panamera: $85,000
Panamera 4: $89,500
S450: $89,900
A8 4.0T: $92,000 (TBD on pricing for the new model)
S450 4Matic: $92,900
Model S 100D: $94,000
750i: $96,000
Panamera 4 Executive: $96,300
XJ L 5.0: $96,300
750i X Drive: $99,400
S 560 4Matic: $102,900
Panamera 4S: $103,000
Panamera 4S Executive: $113,900


I've made the comments that 1) I think Lexus made the right call with the new base 3.5L TT V6 and 2) that I think there should be a V8, non-F option. When you look at the prices and models above, I really believe that Lexus had an opening around $85-90k for an LS "550" with around 500 horsepower V8. To my earlier point, LS 500 will be more than enough engine for 90% of buyers, but there is a lot of competition at the middle of this segment as well, with S560, 750i, Panamera, Model S, XJ - models that are more emotional and driver-focused with bigger engines and more output. I know the argument can be made that the volume here is small and the juice isn't worth the squeeze, but I believe it would have looked good for Lexus to have a horse in this race. As it stands now, Lexus is straddling tiers 1 and 2 with LS 500 and I think it would have been great for them to solidly offer something in both, short of LS F.

While it's not the magazine racer or Youtube commenter who often buys cars in this class, once you start talking about Panamera (who Lexus execs have referenced as a consideration in LS redesign), XJ L 5.0 and others, it's just unfortunate that the LS isn't really mentioned in that company because the LS 500 lacks the muscle to go that extra 2/10ths. Perhaps when the LS F shows up, nobody will even care that there's no "middle" V8 car. Time will tell.

Great post...I agree a V-8 option should be AN OPTION. Being in Miami which is a city that just drowns itself in luxury cars the S-class is supreme by far. You then see a 7 series/LS and then a A8. But they pale in comparison to how many S-classes are around. And when the initial rush died off, you can lease a S-class for a bit over $1,000 which is considered attractive and will help keep it dominating.

Gecko

@Ian Schmidt posted this in the Lexus/Genesis thread originally and as I kept typing my reply, I realized that it probably belonged more here, so here are some random thoughts:



I didn't see this until you mentioned it... 362hp S450 now starts at $89,900. Didn't the S550 start at like $98k before? New S560 starts at $103k and includes AWD as standard.

Also, BMW seems to be only offering one wheelbase on the 7 series now. Did anyone notice that?

I think LS 500 vs. S450 is a no brainer - there's no way I'd consider the S over the LS at that price point, and the Lexus starts $15k lower. LS 500 vs S560 is a $28k question and while some will say "People shopping in this price bracket don't care about value," that price difference is roughly 1/3 to 1/4 of the value of the car. We're not talking about a few thousand dollars of difference. That's significant (IMO).

I do look forward to someone doing a comparo that's something like:

LS 500 vs. 740i vs S450 vs A8 3.0T and also LS 500 vs 750i vs S560 vs A8 4.0T

History has proven that it's very easy for journalists to drive something like a S560 and 750i back to back with an LS 500 and disregard the $25-30k price difference when it's not their money and you're driving the cars for 2-3 days trying to figure out which one you like most. This is when things like being the fastest, most fun to drive, or highest tech really shine... and the "price" factor isn't really considered until the conclusion is being written and they add "value" to the end of the argument. Then the headlines will become that LS isn't as good and it's not worth your time (if you're a buyer). Is that really the case in the real world, day to day? I highly doubt it.

Let's be honest - Mercedes offers a lot of tech in the S Class that it doesn't seem like LS has countered or included with the LS... but I'm not sure those things really make that much of a difference to the average shopper. GPS-controlled suspension that can make adjustments based on the road ahead? Very cool, but is that a selling feature that would get you to fork over $25k more? For me, no. For a journalist with no skin in the game, that's a pretty cool feature and gives you something neat to hype up in reviews. Day to day for the average shopper, I think 5LS is just as much car as the S560 up to probably 8/10ths. If you're extremely tech savvy and HAVE to have the latest and greatest, or you really desire a V8, then in that last 2/10ths, LS falls behind and is not the right car for you. It's that last 2/10ths that journalists will focus on without worrying about the price difference or making the payment with your own checkbook - or what the car will be worth in 2, 3, 4, 5 years when you're ready to get rid of it. Lexus buyers are much more conscious of these things, which will be good for the brand.

I think of this segment in three tiers:
Tier 1: Base V6 engines
Tier 2: V8 engines
Tier 3: High performance variants like AMG, R, P100D, etc.

The competitive set breaks out as follows:
Model S 75D: $74,500
LS 500: $75,000
A8 L 3.0T: $82,300 (TBD on pricing for the new model)
740i: $83,000
XJ L 3.0: $84,500
Panamera: $85,000
Panamera 4: $89,500
S450: $89,900
A8 4.0T: $92,000 (TBD on pricing for the new model)
S450 4Matic: $92,900
Model S 100D: $94,000
750i: $96,000
Panamera 4 Executive: $96,300
XJ L 5.0: $96,300
750i X Drive: $99,400
S 560 4Matic: $102,900
Panamera 4S: $103,000
Panamera 4S Executive: $113,900


I've made the comments that 1) I think Lexus made the right call with the new base 3.5L TT V6 and 2) that I think there should be a V8, non-F option. When you look at the prices and models above, I really believe that Lexus had an opening around $85-90k for an LS "550" with around 500 horsepower V8. To my earlier point, LS 500 will be more than enough engine for 90% of buyers, but there is a lot of competition at the middle of this segment as well, with S560, 750i, Panamera, Model S, XJ - models that are more emotional and driver-focused with bigger engines and more output. I know the argument can be made that the volume here is small and the juice isn't worth the squeeze, but I believe it would have looked good for Lexus to have a horse in this race. As it stands now, Lexus is straddling tiers 1 and 2 with LS 500 and I think it would have been great for them to solidly offer something in both, short of LS F.

While it's not the magazine racer or Youtube commenter who often buys cars in this class, once you start talking about Panamera (who Lexus execs have referenced as a consideration in LS redesign), XJ L 5.0 and others, it's just unfortunate that the LS isn't really mentioned in that company because the LS 500 lacks the muscle to go that extra 2/10ths. Perhaps when the LS F shows up, nobody will even care that there's no "middle" V8 car. Time will tell.

Great post...I agree a V-8 option should be AN OPTION. Being in Miami which is a city that just drowns itself in luxury cars the S-class is supreme by far. You then see a 7 series/LS and then a A8. But they pale in comparison to how many S-classes are around. And when the initial rush died off, you can lease a S-class for a bit over $1,000 which is considered attractive and will help keep it dominating.

Consumer reports was less than charitable in their quick review today. They're usually more upbeat on Lexus products:

Consumer reports was less than charitable in their quick review today. They're usually more upbeat on Lexus products:

Consumer reports was less than charitable in their quick review today. They're usually more upbeat on Lexus products:

Consumer reports was less than charitable in their quick review today. They're usually more upbeat on Lexus products:

^That was fairly brutal. Ouch.

^That was fairly brutal. Ouch.

^That was fairly brutal. Ouch.

^That was fairly brutal. Ouch.

Consumer Reports has a bit of tarnish on their reputation after they recently bought the popular website The Consumerist and shut it down to end the competition.

Consumer Reports has a bit of tarnish on their reputation after they recently bought the popular website The Consumerist and shut it down to end the competition.

Consumer Reports has a bit of tarnish on their reputation after they recently bought the popular website The Consumerist and shut it down to end the competition.

Consumer Reports has a bit of tarnish on their reputation after they recently bought the popular website The Consumerist and shut it down to end the competition.

Serpens

Consumer reports was less than charitable in their quick review today. They're usually more upbeat on Lexus products:

All reviewers seem to focus on the infotainment system as the one item that makes the Lexus unacceptable . First off it seems to me, you only go into the multi levels to do the initial settings and after that items like temps and audio items are adjustable with the knurled knobs or buttons. Their anger is overplayed, spread the word.