Rendered: The Three-Row Lexus RX 350L Crossover


With just a couple weeks before the debut of the three-row Lexus RX at the LA Auto Show, Autoweek took a shot at forecasting what the new crossover may look like with the above rendering.

It’s expected that the differences between the standard RX and its seven-seat variant will be minimal — rumors suggest the wheelbase will be identical and that only the angle and length of the hatch will change. Autoweek has obviously subscribed to this idea, as here is the standard RX for comparison:

Lexus RX Standard

Lexus RX L Autoweek Rendering

If this turns out true, the RX L is going to be a very popular model for Lexus — if anything, the extended rear balances out the front overhang, and the additional functionality outweighs the slight bulk increase.

Let’s hear your opinion — what do you think of this Autoweek rendering?

Lexus RX: Fourth GenerationPhotochops
Comments
The Power of Three: All-new 3-row Lexus RXL to Debut at the 2017 Los Angeles Auto Show

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 15, 2017 – How can the top-selling Lexus RX get even better? Make more of it. The all-new 2018 RX 350L, now featuring three rows, will make its World Premiere at the 2017 Los Angeles Auto Show. The hybrid model, the RX 450hL, will also be announced. The RX that paved the way for the luxury crossover segment 20 years ago will retain its stylish figure while also providing more flexibility for passengers.

The RX 350L will be revealed at the Lexus Press Conference taking place on November 29, 2017 at 10:00 am PST in the South Hall at the Los Angeles Convention Center.

http://pressroom.lexus.com/releases...w+3+row+lexus+rxl+debut+2017+la+auto+show.htm
krew [​IMG]

Lexus confirms the rumors with a teaser image and a press release.
View the original article post
krew [​IMG]

Lexus confirms the rumors with a teaser image and a press release.
View the original article post
No brainer finally arrives. I'm very very curious to see how this impacts the market, including GX cannibalization.
No brainer finally arrives. I'm very very curious to see how this impacts the market, including GX cannibalization.
The moment of the truth
The moment of the truth
mikeavelli
No brainer finally arrives. I'm very very curious to see how this impacts the market, including GX cannibalization.
I think this will steal sales from not only the GX, but from MDX buyers too.
mikeavelli
No brainer finally arrives. I'm very very curious to see how this impacts the market, including GX cannibalization.
I think this will steal sales from not only the GX, but from MDX buyers too.
ThePenguin
I think this will steal sales from not only the GX, but from MDX buyers too.
Quite frankly, I think this thing is going to slaughter the MDX and QX60... if they price it within reason.
ThePenguin
I think this will steal sales from not only the GX, but from MDX buyers too.
Quite frankly, I think this thing is going to slaughter the MDX and QX60... if they price it within reason.
C
Gecko
Quite frankly, I think this thing is going to slaughter the MDX and QX60... if they price it within reason.
My expectation is about a 3K USD price increase like for like equipped.

As for monthly sales, RX should easily hit 12K units but mostly at the expense of the competition (MDX and QX60), and not so much the GX since it's a different buyer (crossover car-like buyer vs rugged body-on-frame SUV).
C
Gecko
Quite frankly, I think this thing is going to slaughter the MDX and QX60... if they price it within reason.
My expectation is about a 3K USD price increase like for like equipped.

As for monthly sales, RX should easily hit 12K units but mostly at the expense of the competition (MDX and QX60), and not so much the GX since it's a different buyer (crossover car-like buyer vs rugged body-on-frame SUV).
mikeavelli
No brainer finally arrives. I'm very very curious to see how this impacts the market, including GX cannibalization.
I agree it's a no-brainer, but, compared to the GX, it's still apples and oranges. The GX's truck-based frame can do more heavy work (such as towing boats) than the crossover RX. But, of course, the SUV market has clearly been shifting in the direction of crossovers for some years now.
mikeavelli
No brainer finally arrives. I'm very very curious to see how this impacts the market, including GX cannibalization.
I agree it's a no-brainer, but, compared to the GX, it's still apples and oranges. The GX's truck-based frame can do more heavy work (such as towing boats) than the crossover RX. But, of course, the SUV market has clearly been shifting in the direction of crossovers for some years now.
C
  • C
    CIF
  • November 15, 2017
corradoMR2
My expectation is about a 3K USD price increase like for like equipped.

As for monthly sales, RX should easily hit 12K units but mostly at the expense of the competition (MDX and QX60), and not so much the GX since it's a different buyer (crossover car-like buyer vs rugged body-on-frame SUV).
Agreed. I know many people myself who absolutely love the GX, but are very neutral or lukewarm with the RX. Likewise, I also know plenty of RX owners who don't really care for the GX. So yeah, I'd say two fairly different buyers.

Also as a data point, many worried the NX would cannibalize RX sales. No such thing happened.

Besides, in today's market, there is such hot demand for both quality body-on-frame SUVs as well as crossovers, that I think RXL will greatly expand Lexus sales without affecting any other SUV or crossover models. I think it will certainly affect some of the weaker competition though :D.

If Lexus ever puts a stronger engine into the RX family, it will really start the bring the pain to the competition then.

mmcartalk
I agree it's a no-brainer, but, compared to the GX, it's still apples and oranges. The GX's truck-based frame can do more heavy work (such as towing boats) than the crossover RX. But, of course, the SUV market has clearly been shifting in the direction of crossovers for some years now.
Yes and no. As the old saying goes, a rising tide lifts all boats. While the market has mostly been shifting to crossovers, pickup trucks are also doing extremely well, as are many body-on-frame SUVs. Some BOF SUVs like the 4Runner are seeing exceptional sales. This is just the current market trend where almost all utility vehicles are selling well. The 4Runner this year could quite possibly set an all time historic annual sales record. This is how good some body-on-frame SUVs are doing.
C
  • C
    CIF
  • November 15, 2017
corradoMR2
My expectation is about a 3K USD price increase like for like equipped.

As for monthly sales, RX should easily hit 12K units but mostly at the expense of the competition (MDX and QX60), and not so much the GX since it's a different buyer (crossover car-like buyer vs rugged body-on-frame SUV).
Agreed. I know many people myself who absolutely love the GX, but are very neutral or lukewarm with the RX. Likewise, I also know plenty of RX owners who don't really care for the GX. So yeah, I'd say two fairly different buyers.

Also as a data point, many worried the NX would cannibalize RX sales. No such thing happened.

Besides, in today's market, there is such hot demand for both quality body-on-frame SUVs as well as crossovers, that I think RXL will greatly expand Lexus sales without affecting any other SUV or crossover models. I think it will certainly affect some of the weaker competition though :D.

If Lexus ever puts a stronger engine into the RX family, it will really start the bring the pain to the competition then.

mmcartalk
I agree it's a no-brainer, but, compared to the GX, it's still apples and oranges. The GX's truck-based frame can do more heavy work (such as towing boats) than the crossover RX. But, of course, the SUV market has clearly been shifting in the direction of crossovers for some years now.
Yes and no. As the old saying goes, a rising tide lifts all boats. While the market has mostly been shifting to crossovers, pickup trucks are also doing extremely well, as are many body-on-frame SUVs. Some BOF SUVs like the 4Runner are seeing exceptional sales. This is just the current market trend where almost all utility vehicles are selling well. The 4Runner this year could quite possibly set an all time historic annual sales record. This is how good some body-on-frame SUVs are doing.
Would've made more sense to show the C and D-Pillar, since those are the only parts that will look different.
Would've made more sense to show the C and D-Pillar, since those are the only parts that will look different.
CIF
Yes and no. As the old saying goes, a rising tide lifts all boats. While the market has mostly been shifting to crossovers, pickup trucks are also doing extremely well, as are many body-on-frame SUVs. Some BOF SUVs like the 4Runner are seeing exceptional sales. This is just the current market trend where almost all utility vehicles are selling well. The 4Runner this year could quite possibly set an all time historic annual sales record. This is how good some body-on-frame SUVs are doing.
Good point on the 4Runner. Yes, it definitely sells. So do the large BOF SUVs from GM, Ford, and the much smaller Jeep Wrangler. But the bulk of the SUV market is clearly shifting to the crossovers.
CIF
Yes and no. As the old saying goes, a rising tide lifts all boats. While the market has mostly been shifting to crossovers, pickup trucks are also doing extremely well, as are many body-on-frame SUVs. Some BOF SUVs like the 4Runner are seeing exceptional sales. This is just the current market trend where almost all utility vehicles are selling well. The 4Runner this year could quite possibly set an all time historic annual sales record. This is how good some body-on-frame SUVs are doing.
Good point on the 4Runner. Yes, it definitely sells. So do the large BOF SUVs from GM, Ford, and the much smaller Jeep Wrangler. But the bulk of the SUV market is clearly shifting to the crossovers.
I spent some time over the last few weeks helping a coworker shop for "something nice that can fit both of my kids comfortably and costs around $50-55k." That pretty quickly came down to RX, MDX, QX60 and... Highlander.

I won't go into all of the details, but I really don't understand how the Acura brand is still in business. We drove the RDX, TLX and MDX and I know Acura's entire model range is a bit long in the tooth right now, but I was kind of shocked by the general downmarket feel of each of them. That certain quirky Honda-ness shines through and I understand some people like that, but the RDX and TLX were pretty quickly eliminated because of size. The MDX was eliminated because of the interior and dashboard. The interiors of all three have tons of plastic, minimal wood and generally didn't feel "premium" with regard to fit and finish. The current CR-V and Accord are much more impressive, but I don't care for all of the shiny black plastic inside the Pilot. Overall, the Acuras felt no better than Hondas, Toyotas, Fords, etc.

Infiniti QX60 was pretty nice inside but she didn't like the CVT transmission and it was a bit out of her price range. They tried to sell her on a CPO model.... but...

... then we went to the Toyota dealership and drove a Highlander Platinum Hybrid. I can't believe I'm saying this, but the Highlander handily trounces the MDX and QX60 without a second thought. Neither holds a candle to the Toyota. The only case I can make for buying either of those is if you absolutely have to have a premium badge. Highlander drives better, handles better, feels much more solid on the road, has nicer interior amenities, is more powerful, gets better MPG and costs $10-15k less. Im really baffled about how Acura or Infiniti are selling any of these in comparison to a Highlander.

We also spent some time at the Lexus dealer driving ES and RX, and she really, really loved the RX. "ES is nice but looks like a boat" was the exact phrase from my friend. With options comparable to a Highlander, the RX quickly creeps beyond $55k and the interior is a lot smaller. Ultimately, the Highlander won out because of versatility, extra space and price, but my point in telling you all of this is that when Lexus unleashes the RX L, it will be a very, very hard time for Acura and Infiniti dealers. The interior of the RX feels 2 classes above the MDX and at least one above the QX60. The RX also outshines both on the road with passenger comfort, smoothness and powertrain refinement. The MDX drives kind of hard and while it handles decently, it doesn't give you the same feeling of quality and solidarity that an RX does. QX60 felt slow and unresponsive because of the CVT.

If the RX L has a decently usable third row, it's going to be a bloodbath for the other two.... probably for some other competitors as well. Overall, I was reminded why the RX is so popular - it's so comfortable, beautifully built, has all the right tech options, has an interior that's pleasing to the eye and fingers, feels solid and composed on the road and feels a little more expensive than what it really costs. It ticks all the boxes. Honestly, so does the Highlander just with fewer amenities, but this is going to be a great, GREAT addition for Lexus dealers. Can't wait to see the execution.
I spent some time over the last few weeks helping a coworker shop for "something nice that can fit both of my kids comfortably and costs around $50-55k." That pretty quickly came down to RX, MDX, QX60 and... Highlander.

I won't go into all of the details, but I really don't understand how the Acura brand is still in business. We drove the RDX, TLX and MDX and I know Acura's entire model range is a bit long in the tooth right now, but I was kind of shocked by the general downmarket feel of each of them. That certain quirky Honda-ness shines through and I understand some people like that, but the RDX and TLX were pretty quickly eliminated because of size. The MDX was eliminated because of the interior and dashboard. The interiors of all three have tons of plastic, minimal wood and generally didn't feel "premium" with regard to fit and finish. The current CR-V and Accord are much more impressive, but I don't care for all of the shiny black plastic inside the Pilot. Overall, the Acuras felt no better than Hondas, Toyotas, Fords, etc.

Infiniti QX60 was pretty nice inside but she didn't like the CVT transmission and it was a bit out of her price range. They tried to sell her on a CPO model.... but...

... then we went to the Toyota dealership and drove a Highlander Platinum Hybrid. I can't believe I'm saying this, but the Highlander handily trounces the MDX and QX60 without a second thought. Neither holds a candle to the Toyota. The only case I can make for buying either of those is if you absolutely have to have a premium badge. Highlander drives better, handles better, feels much more solid on the road, has nicer interior amenities, is more powerful, gets better MPG and costs $10-15k less. Im really baffled about how Acura or Infiniti are selling any of these in comparison to a Highlander.

We also spent some time at the Lexus dealer driving ES and RX, and she really, really loved the RX. "ES is nice but looks like a boat" was the exact phrase from my friend. With options comparable to a Highlander, the RX quickly creeps beyond $55k and the interior is a lot smaller. Ultimately, the Highlander won out because of versatility, extra space and price, but my point in telling you all of this is that when Lexus unleashes the RX L, it will be a very, very hard time for Acura and Infiniti dealers. The interior of the RX feels 2 classes above the MDX and at least one above the QX60. The RX also outshines both on the road with passenger comfort, smoothness and powertrain refinement. The MDX drives kind of hard and while it handles decently, it doesn't give you the same feeling of quality and solidarity that an RX does. QX60 felt slow and unresponsive because of the CVT.

If the RX L has a decently usable third row, it's going to be a bloodbath for the other two.... probably for some other competitors as well. Overall, I was reminded why the RX is so popular - it's so comfortable, beautifully built, has all the right tech options, has an interior that's pleasing to the eye and fingers, feels solid and composed on the road and feels a little more expensive than what it really costs. It ticks all the boxes. Honestly, so does the Highlander just with fewer amenities, but this is going to be a great, GREAT addition for Lexus dealers. Can't wait to see the execution.
mmcartalk
Good point on the 4Runner. Yes, it definitely sells. So do the large BOF SUVs from GM, Ford, and the much smaller Jeep Wrangler. But the bulk of the SUV market is clearly shifting to the crossovers.
The shift to crossovers comes from BOF SUVs/Trucks but mostly from hatches, sedans, wagons and vans.
mmcartalk
Good point on the 4Runner. Yes, it definitely sells. So do the large BOF SUVs from GM, Ford, and the much smaller Jeep Wrangler. But the bulk of the SUV market is clearly shifting to the crossovers.
The shift to crossovers comes from BOF SUVs/Trucks but mostly from hatches, sedans, wagons and vans.
Autoweek's rendering of what the RX L could look like:

Autoweek's rendering of what the RX L could look like:

C
  • C
    CIF
  • November 16, 2017
Joaquin Ruhi
Autoweek's rendering of what the RX L could look like:

Let's hope it doesn't look like that because that rear end looks awkward.

C